Toolbox

Advanced

Keep me posted Forum Twitter Facebook
Keep me posted
RSS

 

Talks and comments


Added by fishnose |  May 21
D4 lens tests
Added by derway |  May 20
Please test EXR modes on all fuji cameras that support it
Added by eireann |  May 19
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II will be tested when
Added by eireann |  May 19
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED bad Chr aberration results
Added by koleh77 |  May 18
Re: A37
Added by koleh77 |  May 18
Re: Sony A57
Added by Bobo_SAN |  May 18
Re: A37

Contrary to conventional wisdom, higher resolution actually compensates for noise

Introduction | Modeling small pixels | Comparing the SNR of cameras with different resolutions | Real-life comparisons | Conclusion

The argument above provides a method to compare cameras with different resolutions. A high-resolution camera can still be turned into a low-resolution camera by averaging its pixels.

In order to compare all cameras and not just pairs, a reference resolution can be chosen and equivalent SNRs at this resolution are computed. Let Nref denote this reference resolution. Consider a camera with N Mpix. To obtain an image with Nref pixels, N / Nref pixels need to be averaged out to produce a single pixel in the output image, so the noise decreases by a factor of . We then deduce that SNRref at resolution Nref can be obtained from the nominal SNR (in dB) using the formula


Notice that if the reference resolution Nref is very large, or if the initial sensor has a low resolution, the normalized SNR can actually be lower than the nominal SNR.