|
Toolbox
|
|
|
Added by dosdan |
February 02
DR: K-01 vs K-5
|
|
|
Added by alrav2 |
February 02
Nikon 180 f/2.8D IF-ED
|
|
|
Added by MarsWarrior |
February 02
Pricing
|
|
|
Added by dosdan |
February 02
Re: Studio Camera
|
|
|
Added by Rove |
February 02
Studio Camera
|
|
|
Added by Stephen123 |
February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera
|
|
|
Added by lightsabre |
February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera
|
| Introduction | Modeling small pixels | Comparing the SNR of cameras with different resolutions | Real-life comparisons | Conclusion |
The argument above provides a method to compare cameras with different resolutions. A high-resolution camera can still be turned into a low-resolution camera by averaging its pixels.
In
order to compare all cameras and not just pairs, a reference resolution can be
chosen and equivalent SNRs at this resolution are computed. Let Nref
denote this reference resolution. Consider a camera with N Mpix. To
obtain an image with Nref pixels, N / Nref
pixels need to be averaged out to produce a single pixel in the output image,
so the noise decreases by a factor of
.
We then deduce that SNRref at resolution Nref
can be obtained from the nominal SNR (in dB) using the formula
![]()
Notice that if the reference resolution Nref is very large, or if the initial sensor has a low resolution, the normalized SNR can actually be lower than the nominal SNR.