Toolbox

Advanced

Keep me posted Forum Twitter Facebook
Keep me posted
RSS

 

Talks and comments


Added by dosdan |  February 02
DR: K-01 vs K-5
Added by alrav2 |  February 02
Nikon 180 f/2.8D IF-ED
Added by MarsWarrior |  February 02
Pricing
Added by dosdan |  February 02
Re: Studio Camera
Added by Rove |  February 02
Studio Camera
Added by Stephen123 |  February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera
Added by lightsabre |  February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera

Contrary to conventional wisdom, higher resolution actually compensates for noise

Introduction | Modeling small pixels | Comparing the SNR of cameras with different resolutions | Real-life comparisons | Conclusion

Noise measurements in RAW format are indicative of pixel performance, but the viewing conditions of the image must also be taken into account. To compare prints on a given format of cameras with different resolutions, it is more suitable to compute the equivalent SNR of a camera with a given reference resolution. For equal, normalized SNR, a high-resolution camera is still better than a low-resolution camera. While it is always possible to simulate a low-resolution camera using a higher resolution camera (since downsampling is easy), it is not possible to simulate a high-resolution camera using a lower-resolution camera other than by interpolating or inventing data.