|
Toolbox
|
|
|
Added by dosdan |
February 02
DR: K-01 vs K-5
|
|
|
Added by alrav2 |
February 02
Nikon 180 f/2.8D IF-ED
|
|
|
Added by MarsWarrior |
February 02
Pricing
|
|
|
Added by dosdan |
February 02
Re: Studio Camera
|
|
|
Added by Rove |
February 02
Studio Camera
|
|
|
Added by Stephen123 |
February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera
|
|
|
Added by lightsabre |
February 01
Re: GX1 is a big camera
|
| Introduction | Modeling small pixels | Comparing the SNR of cameras with different resolutions | Real-life comparisons | Conclusion |
Noise measurements in RAW format are indicative of pixel performance, but the viewing conditions of the image must also be taken into account. To compare prints on a given format of cameras with different resolutions, it is more suitable to compute the equivalent SNR of a camera with a given reference resolution. For equal, normalized SNR, a high-resolution camera is still better than a low-resolution camera. While it is always possible to simulate a low-resolution camera using a higher resolution camera (since downsampling is easy), it is not possible to simulate a high-resolution camera using a lower-resolution camera other than by interpolating or inventing data.