|
Toolbox
|
|
|
Added by fishnose |
May 21
D4 lens tests
|
|
|
Added by derway |
May 20
Please test EXR modes on all fuji cameras that support it
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II will be tested when
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED bad Chr aberration results
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: A37
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: Sony A57
|
|
|
Added by Bobo_SAN |
May 18
Re: A37
|
| Introduction | Noise in shadows | Noise in mid-tones | Noise in highlights | Summary | Annex |
Why does photonic noise variance have to be proportional to the signal?
It is worth noting that photonic noise is due to the light signal itself and is independent of the camera. It is mathematically modeled by a Poisson process, and consequently, the mean signal is equal to its variance. (This is a mathematical property of a Poisson process.) It is possible to prove this property without any assumptions; however:
Assume that a
pixel receives
photons
and has a noise standard deviation
. Let’snow cut this pixel into four
smaller pixels of equal size. Each small pixel receives an average number of
photons
and
has a noise standard deviation
. Since the variance is additive, the
variance of the large pixel value is the sum of the variances of the small
pixel values. Thus:
![]()
From this, it
is not very difficult to see that
has to be proportional to
.
Photonic noise is the main source of noise in the midtones, and follows the rule of 3dB per EV: