• 
• Mobiles
• Cameras
  • Camera Sensor Database
    • Canon
    • Fujifilm
    • Hasselblad
    • Konica Minolta
    • Leaf
    • Leica
    • Mamiya
    • Nikon
    • Olympus
    • Panasonic
    • Pentax
    • Phase One
    • Ricoh
    • Samsung
    • Sigma
    • Sony
  • Camera Sensor Ratings
  • Compare Camera Sensors
• Lenses
  • Camera Lens Database
    • Canon
    • Carl Zeiss
    • Fujifilm
    • Kenko Tokina
    • Konica Minolta
    • Leica
    • Lensbaby
    • Nikon
    • Noktor
    • Olympus
    • Panasonic
    • Pentax
    • Rokinon
    • Samsung
    • Samyang
    • Schneider Kreuznach
    • Sigma
    • SLR Magic
    • Sony
    • Tamron
    • Tokina
    • Voigtlander
  • Camera Lens Ratings
  • Compare Camera Lenses
• Publications
  • DxOMark Reviews
  • DxOMark Insights
• About
  • What is DxOMark?
  • DxOMark writers
  • Lens scores
  • Sensor scores
  • In-depth measurements
  • Glossary
  • Forum
  • Company

The 17-50mm lenses, equivalent to the classical 24-70mm for the full frame cameras, are at the heart of Nikon, Canon, Pentax and Tamron's catalogs. But, even if all vendors are eager to offer the best high-speed wide-angle zoom for APS-C cameras, apparently Sigma managed to beat them all.

With this 17-50mm F2.8 lens for Nikon, Sigma offers a very high end wide-angle zoom at a very good price. DxOMark tests tend to prove that the Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Nikon is so good that it even surpasses its competitors from Nikon and Canon which are twice as expensive.
However, if you’re looking for a solid wide-angle zoom, the good-old Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] Nikon is also a good alternative.

What we like

• Overall DxOMark Score very good for this type of zoom and it stays very high from f/2.8 to f/4 on the whole focal range
• The lens is very sharp in the center and the resolution stays very high towards the field
• Very well controlled Chromatic aberration at any focal in the range

What could be better

• Slightly too much distortion at the focal of 17mm
• The vignetting is also a bit too present at 17mm: almost 2 EV in the corners

Let's see how this lens compare to its competition:

Sigma vs Nikon:

 Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Nikon vs Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED
With a distortion and transmission similar to the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8, the amazing sharpness at the center and across the field gives a decisive advantage to the Sigma lens.
So, even without taking in account its very affordable price, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM Nikon is an excellent choice.

Sigma vs Canon:

Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Canon vs Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
The Canon version of this 17-55mm Sigma lens is also an excellent lens. In the tests we made with a Canon EOS 7D, the sharpness was better than the Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 across the field. The transmission was slightly higher too.
However, the distortion at 17mm is slightly better controlled by the Canon lens: 0.4% for Canon vs 0.75% for Sigma

Sigma vs Tamron:

Canon mount: Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Canon vs Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] Canon
Nikon mount: Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Nikon vs Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] Nikon

Sigma and Tamron both propose here very good high-speed wide-angle zoom with these lenses.
If we would have to make a choice, for the Canon mount version, we would go for the Sigma version which offers a much higher sharpness. But, for the Nikon versions of these lenses, the test results on a D300 are so similar that the choice is be much tougher. We would have to make it a draw.