| Introduction | 24 Mpix to 36 Mpix, is there any good reasons to switch? | Nikon D800 and standard lens choices | The Nikon D800 and telephoto lenses | The Nikon D800 and wide-angle lenses |
In this second part of the Nikon D800 and lenses review, we’re looking at the standard focal lengths. Within this group, there is a very wide range available. When searching for a standard lens, you have the option of both prime and zoom, depending on what suits your needs best. To help make it easy to select the right lens, we’ll look at the 50mm primes, 85mm primes, macro lenses and finally the standard focal range zooms.
In total, the DxOMark labs have tested 28 lenses within this focal range, 22 of which are prime lenses from 50mm to 105mm, and 6 fall within the standard zoom category with focal lengths around the 24-70mm type focal range.
An interesting factor found through the labs is that the 50mm and 85mm focal lengths tend to outperform all other prime lenses tested, with the 85mm and 105mm lenses scoring particularly highly. In fact, the highest scoring lenses tested by the DxOMark labs have all been 85mm primes – certainly something to consider if you’re looking for the ‘best’ lenses on any camera.
In addition to this, the often repeated line that prime lenses are better than zoom lenses is once again borne out here, with prime lenses outperforming zoom lenses by between 20 and 30% - a quite significant difference that you may feel more than justifies the lack of versatility provided by prime lens models.
50mm
If you’re looking for a true standard lens, then 50mm is the focal length you should be choosing. Within the 50mm options, DxOMark have tested 7 different models. There are three models that come out on top, but the top five are all very close.
| Lens | Price ($) | DxOMark Score |
| Sigma 50mm F1.4 EX DG HSM Nikon | 499 | 32 |
| Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 D | 329 | 32 |
| Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 G | 448 | 32 |
| Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T 50mm f/2 ZF2 Nikon | 1280 | 31 |
| Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G | 219 | 31 |
| Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D | 134 | 29 |
| Carl Zeiss Planar T 50mm f/1.4 ZF2 Nikon | 725 | 26 |
The three top scorers are from Nikon and Sigma - the Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D, Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G and Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM. All three managed 32 on the DxOMark scores putting them at the top of the list for 50mm lenses on the D800. Strangely the Sigma 50mm lens is the most expensive of the trio, but given that the price difference is not much more than $100 between the three, unless budget is a real concern, this and the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G are the two top choices. That said, the performance of the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G makes it a very worthy consideration if budget is a concern.
85mm to 105mm
In this focal range, DxOMark have tested 14 different lenses, so your choice for a portrait lens is huge.
| Lens | Price ($) | DxOMark Score |
| Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G | 2199 | 40 |
| Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G | 690 | 40 |
| Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T 100mm f/2 ZF2 Nikon | 1840 | 36 |
| Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Nikon | 328 | 36 |
| Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM Nikon | 969 | 35 |
| Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 D IF | 1230 | 33 |
| Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G | 890 | 32 |
| Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D | 460 | 32 |
| Carl Zeiss Planar T 85mm f/1.4 ZF2 Nikon | 1280 | 29 |
| Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO Nikon | 460 | 29 |
| Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG Macro Nikon | 640 | 28 |
| Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon | 969 | 28 |
Within this range, the story is much the same as with the 50mm lenses, with two Nikon lenses taking top honors and surprisingly a Samyang model rounding out the top three. In this case, it’s the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G, the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G and the Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF. The two Nikon lenses both scored the same on the DxOMark overall metrics, managing 40, while the Samyang model is fractionally behind on 36. In terms of choice, if you want the wider aperture of the f/1.4 it will cost you, with that lens coming in at nearly $2200, but it will provide the highest overall sharpness at 22P-Mpix. However the slightly slower, but optically just as good, 85mm f/1.8G looks to be a fantastic bargain at only $690 and offers less vignetting, chromatic aberration and distortion than its more expensive stable-mate, while losing out only slightly in overall sharpness. In terms of selecting one of these models, it is very hard to choose against the cheaper option because the more expensive model does not do enough to justify the higher price tag.
If the Nikon 85mm f/1.8G doesn’t fit your budget, then take a long look at the Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF. It lacks any autofocus ability, but a score of 36 is remarkably good for such a low priced lens. If you can live with the manual limitations, it is worth serious consideration.
50mm to 105mm macro lenses
If a macro function is important to you, then the best macro lens around this focal range is the Carl Zeiss Makro-Plana T 100mm f/2 ZF2 Nikon, which scored 36. However, the cost is high at around $1840 and the lack of autofocus ability means it is one for the purist who is willing to put up with the fully manual nature of the lens. The Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED however is a slightly more budget conscious choice at $890. It scored almost as well at 32 and has the added benefit of full AF and a vibration reduction system to help avoid camera shake - something that is even more obvious in macro photography.
If you prefer working closer in to your subjects, then it is also worth considering the Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T 50mm f/2 ZF2 Nikon. This is a 50mm macro lens, that scored 31 in the overall DxOMark scores and managed the joint highest sharpness score for all the macro lenses tested, at 17P-Mpix. At $1280USD it follows the familiar Zeiss trend of being at the top of the price bracket, but the quality is unquestionable and if you are looking for a macro lens around this focal length, then the lack of autofocus should not necessarily put you off.
Standard Zoom lenses
Within those tested, it is clear that the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD and Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED are the best choices for image quality. For zoom lenses to score 29 and 28 is pretty impressive, especially given the high resolution of the camera, where flaws caused by compromises in optical design are much more obvious. At $1,800, however, the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 is pricey. The new Tamron, sporting a pricetag of $1,299, is definitely a viable choice, given the circumstances.
Within those tested, it is clear that the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED is the best choice for image quality. For a zoom lens to score 28 is pretty impressive, especially given the high resolution of the camera, where flaws caused by compromises in optical design are more obvious. At $1800 it is expensive though.
Below these two lenses, there are three models that all scored 23. They are the the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF), the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 IF EX DG HSM Nikon and the Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4D IF. Of the three, the Sigma lens comes out on top in the sharpness test, managing a very respectable 16P-MPix that even beats the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED mentioned above. Sadly, it is hampered by its chromatic aberration, which scores a very poor 26µm. At $899, it is also the most expensive of the three.
If you’re looking for the real “budget star” of the trio, then the Tamron is the best choice With a sharpness score of 13M-Pix, it beats the Nikon and is the cheapest ($499) of the three by a noticeable margin. For it to match the scores of several more expensive lenses is a fantastic achievement, and it should get the nod as the best bargain of the bunch.
Conclusion
Since they have such different uses, there can be no clear winner in these groups, so the results should be used to help you build a kit of lenses to cover your shooting needs. Clearly the best image quality possible comes from the 85mm lenses, though if you don’t shoot portraits, you may well find an 85mm lens surplus to requirements.
In part 3 of this series we’ll be looking at the telephoto lenses as well as the super-zoom models that provide a lot of versatility. The question is, how will they stand up to the rigors of being mounted to the Nikon D800?
|
|
Added by wisep01 |
June 05
Sigma 120-300mm conspicuously absent
Whereas the holy trinity lenses rightly garner much attention, there is a significant dichotomy between them and the so-called super-zooms. Sigma, for instance, has a 120-300mm f/2.8 lens that continues to garner largely favorable reviews, yet has been completely marginalized by this site. Most curious indeed!
Reply |
|
|
Added by Jennibraz |
May 29
Older Lenses
I've been surfing for a Nikkor 75-150mm f/3.5 Series E but was wondering if these older lenses work on D800 bodies? What are the drawbacks to using "retro" or retired lenses that were once only used for film? Do they even fit and connect?
Reply |
|
|
Added by ozvucene |
May 26
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED
Hello!
Excuse me but I don't understand the scores of Nikon 24-70f2,8 ED. You mention that Sigma "scores a very poor 26µm" in chromatic aberation - what about the 31µm of Nikon 24-70f2,8 ED. How can it have score 28 while the Sigma with with similar or even better numbers scores just 23? Thnaks a lot! Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
May 28
Re: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED
Hello!
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. Chromatic aberration is not taken into account for dxomark score, for more information see our documentation: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/About/Lens-scores Except chromatic aberration, these two lenses have close measurement results. See the full comparison here: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Compare-Camera-Lenses/Compare-lenses/%28lens1%29/885/%28lens2%29/175/%28brand1%29/Tamron/%28camera1%29/834/%28brand2%29/Nikkor/%28camera2%29/834 Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by dh003i |
May 13
Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G & Sigma 50-500 OS / pre-OS
It would be nice to see the results for the new Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G, as it is supposed to be an excellent lens.
Also, I'm sure many people are curious about the results for the Sigma 50-500 (new OS & older pre-OS version). If you really want the reach at an affordable price, it is a lens you'd be interested in. I am interested in questions like, "is the Sigma 50-500 at 500mm worse than the new Nikkor 80-400 at 400mm with cropping for same FOV?" and "is the Sigma 50-500 at 500mm worse than the Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8G with a 2x teleconverter at '400mm' and cropped for the same FOV?" Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
May 14
Re: Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G & Sigma 50-500 OS / pre-OS
Hello!
Thanks for your comment. The new 80-400mm will be published soon (few weeks max). Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by Didix |
June 07
Re: Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G & Sigma 50-500 OS / pre-OS
Hi Emilie
Although much longer on the market and a lens real challenging its competitors, DxOMark has not tested it yet :-[ Is there are reason for that? Or may we expect that soon in the charts? Best regards, -Didix Reply |
|
|
Added by abrug |
June 09
Re: Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G & Sigma 50-500 OS / pre-OS
Indeed never a word on the Sigma 50-500mm f/4,5-6,3 DG APO OS HSM. Why ?
Can you plan that ? Reply |
|
|
Added by MopsterUK |
May 01
D800 and ultra wide; no Nikon 14mm f/2.8 D AF ED
<div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Which-lenses-for-your-Nikon-D800">this page on the website</a></div>
Hi, thank you for running your test. I noticed that you didn't include the 'Nikon 14mm f/2.8 D AF ED Lens' in your test, is there a specific reason for this? I noticed that this lense is also not on nikons revised 'lenses to get the highest res from your d800e' list. Would it be possible to either include it here or run a separate test of the 'Nikon 14mm f/2.8 D AF ED Lens' and the d800. Thank you. Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
May 14
Re: D800 and ultra wide; no Nikon 14mm f/2.8 D AF ED
Hello!
Thanks for your suggestion. We will take it into consideration if it is possible for us to do it. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by pevsnem |
April 22
D800 wide-angle review
Dear DxOMARK team,
I see that the Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D IF-ED received a DxOMARK of 20 in this review - yet when one clicks on the lens it doesn't appear to be tested yet. Is there an explanation for that? Thanks. Reply |
|
|
Added by ACFWeidner |
April 22
24mm PC-E
Hi,
Do you intend to publish results for the Nikon 24mm PC-E at any stage in the future? Thanks, Adam Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
April 24
Re: 24mm PC-E
Hello!
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. This test is not planned for now. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by BlackPerch |
April 19
Standard zooms need Tamron 24-70 and Nikon 24-85
I do not think that standard zoom comparison is complete without Tamron 24-70 and Nikon 24-85. Nikon 24-70 would probably remain at the top, but the rest of the standard zooms would most likely need move down. I understand that Tamron 24-70 for Nikon mount is relatively new, but it is a bit puzzling why DXO Mark still have not tested Nikon 24-85.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
April 22
Re: Standard zooms need Tamron 24-70 and Nikon 24-85
Hello!
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. The results for the Tamron 24-70mm are now online :). As for the Nikon 24-85mm, it has been received at the lab last week, so it should be tested in the next days. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by KyleClements |
April 16
D600 tests
This series is sure to become an invaluable resource for photographers for years to come. Thank you for not only doing these detailed camera and lens tests, but for comparing the results in a highly useful way.
As a D600 owner, I eagerly await the next set of tests to see what works best for my own camera. I'm very curious to see what happens. At 24 vs 36MP, I can't imagine the D600 results being any different from these D800 tests; the D600 should be a less demanding camera, so I expect the differences between these lenses should become less apparent. But then again, we might find a few surprises. Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
April 16
Re: D600 tests
Hello!
Thanks for your kind support! Measurements for the Nikon D600 will be released at the end of the month and they are amazing... Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by H.W. |
April 30
Re: D600 testsQuote: Hello! Thanks for your kind support! Measurements for the Nikon D600 will be released at the end of the month and they are amazing... Best regards, The DxOMark team OK, just a small remark. - Today is April, 30th. Much later this month is impossible... ;-) May we have a new date please? - Or even better: The promised article and data? ;-) Best regards && keep up with your excellent work!!! I'm a big fan of DxO! Reply |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
May 02
Re: D600 tests
Hello!
Sorry for the delay, the reviews are coming very soon! :D Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by Tripodasaurus |
April 14
Zeiss lenses
A huge, big thank you to DxOMark for publishing such a fabulous amount of informative work.
Can someone please, please tell me why they buy Zeiss lenses when on the surface of it they are outperformed by the competition, both optically and on price? What do Zeiss have that other lenses don't have? I'd love to buy a Zeiss but am afraid because of the above. Many thanks for replying. Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
April 16
Re: Zeiss lenses
Hello!
Thank you for your kind support. Most of Zeiss lenses score very high, some of them are the best in their class. Other aspect could be of interest, as their build quality, their bokeh, the zoom ring precision, or any other aspect we do not measured. So there are in fact a lot of reasons to buy a Zeiss lens if you have the budget… Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Following on from our series of selecting the best lenses for the Nikon D800 with its potential for massively detailed images from the 36Mpix sensor, we’ve now turned our attention to that camera’s younger sibling, the 24Mpix D600. |