
Just as the NEX C3 succeeded the NEX 3, it's now time for the NEX 5 to be replaced by the NEX 5N. But although some successions are only slight redesigns, the 5N is a completely new camera.
First of all, the 5N features a brand-new sensor with specs very similar to the NEX C3’s. Note that this sensor offers a wide range of ISO—from ISO 100 to a very ambitious ISO 25,600. In term of usability, the NEX 5N is the first of the NEX series with a touch screen.
Overall, the gap between the Sony NEX C3 and the Sony NEX 5N seems narrower than the one between its predecessors, the NEX and the NEX 5. Let’s see if our test results can confirm that.
No surprise here: the Sony NEX 5N takes full advantage of the Sony 16 Mpix sensor with an overall score of 77. The portrait and landscape score are also very high. And the low-light ISO score is pretty good, especially for an APS-C.
So if the rest of the NEX 5N’s image treatments are as good as its sensor, you should be able to take nice photos with it. But let’s check more details:
As we said, the NEX 5N is much more than simply a new version of the NEX 5. Its sensor is very different and so are its DxOMark scores, too.
With the NEX 5N, you get :
No surprise either re: the comparison of the NEX 5N with the NEX C3. As both cameras use the same sensor, the results are almost the same. The slight difference comes from the availability of the ISO 100 setting on the NEX 5N, giving it an additional excellent mark.
Overall, these two cameras are very close, even in term of price.
In this comparison between the NEX 5N and the Nikon J1 and V1, the size of the APS-C sensor gives a large advantage to the NEX 5N. So the J1 and V1 can’t really compete with the NEX 5N, just as they couldn’t compete with the NEX C3 in our review of the Nikon 1 series.
The NEX 5N comes very close to the A77 and even surpasses the latter’s low-light ISO score. This was to be expected because the A77 sits behind a semi-transparent mirror that deflects part of the light away from the sensor. So the real comparison will be between the NEX 5N and the mirror-less Sony NEX 7.
As this comparison between the NEX 5N and the Olympus PEN EP3 shows, the NEX 5N stays ahead in term of image quality. But the PEN EP3 and the other micro-four-third cameras by Panasonic and Olympus offer a much smaller form factor, especially in term of lens size.
|
|
Added by thirtywest |
April 01, 2012
cable release
Can a shutter cable release be used with any of the Sony Nex cameras? I need to be 2 meters behind the camera when firing and the remote controlled sensor is on the front. A physical cable or some way to re-direct the infrared sensor is needed.
Reply |
|
|
Added by digitphotography |
October 06, 2011
nex-5n review
"This was to be expected as the sensor of the A77 accommodates 50% more pixels in the same surface. So, as the A77 pixels are smaller, they catch less light, giving the A77 a lower Lowlight score." Huh? Doesn't the dxomark testing procedure account for this by normalizing results to a given print size? Surely the difference has more to do with the SLT design of the A77. This statement perpetuates the more-megapixels-equals-more-noise myth, a myth that dxomark itself debunks with an excellent article.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Nicolas |
October 07, 2011
Re: nex-5n review
You are completely right.
This mistake threaded its way through our proof reading process. We corrected the review. Thanks a lot for pointing it out. Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
It’s rare in the world of photography for a manufacturer to come up with an entirely new product line from scratch, and it’s equally rare for a famous manufacturer such as Nikon (the world market leader) to offer a new lens mount (Nikon CX). This makes the launch of the Nikon 1 line (Nikon J1 and Nikon V1) a major event in photography this fall. |