More cameras

Brand


















 

Tests and reviews for the camera Fujifilm FinePix X10

Measurements and specifications

Fujifilm FinePix X10
To compare this camera:   

DxOMark Sensor Scores

[?]
Overall Score[?]
50
Portrait
(Color Depth)[?]
20.5 bits
Landscape
(Dynamic Range)[?]
11.3 Evs
Sports
(Low-Light ISO)[?]
245 ISO

View how the Fujifilm FinePix X10 camera rates at the DxOMark Score

Type Compact 
Announced 2011-09-01 
Indicative price (USD) 600  
Sensor type CMOS 
Resolution 4028 x 3032  
Sensor photo detectors (Mpix) 12.21  
Sensor size (mm) 6.6 x 8.8 
Color filter array RGB 
Pixel pitch (µm) 2.18  
Bits per pixel 12.0 
Focal length multiplier 3.93 
Aspect Ratio 4:3 
ISO latitude  100 - 12800 
Shutter type Electronic 
Fastest - Slowest speed (s) -  
Frame rate (fps) 7.0  
Live view  Yes 
Stabilization  No 
Firmware  
Dust cleaning 
Mount type  
Weight (gr) 330  
Battery type NP-50 Lithium-Ion 
Battery weight (gr) 20 
Tropicalization  
Camera material Magnesium Alloy 
Mount material  
View finder type Optical 
View finder magnification  
View finder coverage 85 
Mirror lockup  
View finder diopter Diopter adjustment -3.5 to +1.5 m-1 (dpt) 
Monitor type LCD 
Monitor size 2.8 
Monitor pixel 460000 
Articulated screen No 
Touch screen No 
Contrast screen  
Low-pass filter  
Focus mode Yes 
Autofocus modes Single shot AF (S- AF), Continuous AF (C-AF), Manual focus (MF) 
Number of autofocus points 49 
Exposure bracketing  
Exposure compensation  
Drive modes Super High?approx. 10fps (Size M,S), High?approx. 7fps (Size L,M,S), Middle?approx. 5fps (Size L,M,S), Low?approx. 3fps (Size L,M,S) 
Buffer size  
Recording medium SD/SDHC/SDXC 
Image format JPEG, RAW (RAF) 
White balance bracketing  
Connectivity  
Bluetooth  
3G  
Sound recording Stereo 
External micro  
Histogram Yes 
GPS No 
Video Yes 
Maximum format image video 1920 x 1080 / 30 fps 
Full HD Yes 
Live autofocus Yes 
Video file format MOV 
Video codec H.264 
Video stabilisation  

Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
Color response
Sensitivity metamerism index
ISO 17321 		76
 
White balance scales R raw 1.76
G raw 1
B raw 1.93
 
    R sRGB G sRGB B sRGB
Color matrix as defined in ISO standard 17321 R raw 1.55 -0.45 -0.1
G raw -0.08 1.33 -0.25
B raw 0.04 -0.66 1.62

Full Color Sensitivity: Noise covariance ellipses in CIE 1931 Lab color space
Select ISO : 100
(ISO are manufacturer ISO)
 
Select luminance : 30








Currently no lens has been tested mounted on this camera

Further readings for the Fujifilm FinePix X10

To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.

Camera Review  |  February 20
Nikon 1 S1 review: A new product line for the Nikon Hybrid system

Launched in January 2013 the Nikon 1 S1 is a new product line in the Nikon 1 Hybrid Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens series. Targeted at advanced through to expert enthusiasts after a lightweight camera for photography daytrips and holidays the Nikon 1 S1 features a clean minimalistic design. Utilizing a smaller sensor and lower resolution than most of the Hybrid competition though how will it fare in the DxOMark Sensor Scores?
Camera Review  |  February 15
Nikon 1 J3 review: A new midrange offering doesn’t shine

Released just a month after being announced at CES 2013 alongside a new lower-end sibling (the Nikon 1 S1), the new Nikon 1 J3 now takes its place as the midrange model in Nikon’s lineup of interchangeable lens compact cameras, with a list price of $599.95 (with a 10-30mm kit lens). The J3 is an update to the Nikon 1 J2, which came out only five months prior to the announcement of the J3 and S1 and had been the camera maker’s lower-end offering.
Camera Review  |  February 05
Nikon Coolpix P7700 review: Best Nikon compact camera

Often in technology new models of existing products are disappointing, being motivated by the possibility of integrating new features which may not be overly useful. So when a manufacturer updates a good piece of kit and comes out with something even better there is much cause for celebration. Nikon’s Coolpix P7700 is just such a piece of equipment, updating its Coolpix P7100 model in some style.
Article  |  January 11
DxOMark Camera Sensor

A noise benchmark of 187 digital cameras by Peter van den Hamer

DxOMark Camera Sensor is a raw benchmark for camera bodies by DxO Labs. The benchmark is “raw” because it measures image quality using Raw output files. It is also raw as DxO’s data can be used to cook up camera reviews that cover more aspects than image quality.
Camera Review  |  December 20, 2012
Nikon 1 V2 review: Evolution, stasis or regression?

Launched in October 2012, the Nikon 1 V2 is a not unexpected update to the Nikon 1 V1, which debuted in September 2011. The Nikon 1 Series cameras are hybrid cameras with interchangeable lenses. In the case of the V1 and V2, they fall at the upper end of the segment, offering more features and a higher performance level than their more consumer oriented brethren, the Nikon 1 J1 and J2.
Camera Review  |  November 15, 2012
Olympus Pen E-PL5: Qualities of the OM-D E-M5

With the Pen E-PL5, Olympus updates its range of micro 4:3 compact hybrids with redesigned ergonomics, upgraded electronics, and especially with the integration of the same 16Mpix LiveMos sensor found in the OM-D E-M5. Will it show the same advances in image quality as the flagship camera of its line? Our tests provide the answer.
Camera Review  |  November 14, 2012
Canon Powershot S110 review

Canon’s Powershot S110 in an update on its previous Powershot S100, there are some improvements in the styling and user interface and an increase in the maximum ISO, which should be welcome for users working in low light.  However the DxO Mark overall score fails to live up to its predecessor, so are the changes purely cosmetic?
Camera Review  |  October 29, 2012
Nikon 1 J2 – All Quiet on the Eastern Front

The Nikon 1 J2 retains many of the same characteristics of its older brother, the J1, including its 1", 10-Mpix CMOS sensor. Other than its new 3", 921,000-point screen, the new version of Nikon’s compact hybrid puts particular emphasis on creative modes. How does the Nikon 1 J2’s sensor perform with respect to its predecessor, to its direct competitors, and to expert-level hybrids and compacts? Some answers from DxOMark.
Camera Review  |  September 25, 2012
Olympus OM-D E-M5: The best of the micro 4:3 cameras

Olympus caused a sensation when it revived the legendary OM line that had enjoyed its heyday in the silver halide era. The Olympus OM-D E-M5 successfully revisits the OM design in terms of its ergonomics and workmanship. Olympus has quite precisely taken advantage of this new family in its line of compact hybrid micro 4:3 cameras to introduce a new 16 Mpix Live MOS sensor. What is this new sensor all about? Does it represent an improvement over current Pen sensors? Does it help the micro 4:3 category to catch up with the APS-C hybrids (with the Sony NEX in the lead)? Our sensor review provides the answers.
Camera Review  |  January 16, 2012
Fujifjil Finepix X10

Last year, photography headlines noted a revival of enthusiasm in the old-fashioned camera sector.

The most active manufacturers for this segment were Olympus with its PEN camera and Fujifilm, with its Fuji X100 one of the most acclaimed cameras of 2011.
News  |  September 21, 2011
Nikon J1 and Nikon V1 announcement

The long awaited and rumored mirrorless Nikon camera was finally announced today. And it’s not just one but a pair of new mirrorless compact “1 System” cameras that are coming to compete with the Sony NEX 7, the Pentax Q, the Olymps PEN EP3 or even the Fujifilm FinePix X10. These 2 first models in this new Nikon 1 series are the Nikon J1 and Nikon V1.
News  |  September 01, 2011
Fujifilm announces the FinePix X10, a new premium compact camera

Fuji announces a second premium camera in its FinePix X series: the X10. This new compact camera is expected this autumn with a 12-megapixel sensor and a zoom lens equivalent to a 28-112mm lens at f/2-2.8.

Comments
Added by randybenter |  May 13, 2012

Will DXO test the new X10 sensor?

Fuji is offering X10 owners a sensor replacement repair service to address the "orb" issue. I have seen test images that indicate the issue is resolved with the new sensor. I am hoping DXO will test this new sensor to see what else has changed. I also agree with other posts here that this camera should be tested in the various EXR modes. 

Reply  | Read all replies for this comment

First replies for this comment
Added by hoodlum |  May 13, 2012

Re: Will DXO test the new X10 sensor?

+1.  I do hope dxomark tests this new sensor.

Reply
Added by PStoddart |  February 26, 2012

Crop factor error

There is a crop factor error in the specs quote on the X10. If the sensor is 2/3" it must have a crop factor of 3.94 not 5.50. We know this because the X10 lens is 7.1mm - 28.4mm which converts to 28mm - 112mm.

If it was 5.50 you end up with 40mm. :)

Also the crop factor and sensor size are missing from the preview of the X-S1 listing as well. But we know these because it is the same sensor. Therefore 6.6mm x 8.8mm crop factor of 3.94x.

The sensor does not have stabilization but lens does so the specs of the X10 is yes to that question not no.

Finally the shutter speeds are know 30 - 1/4000.

Reply

Added by Hakeem |  January 18, 2012

Really frustrating

Why DXOMark can't test in EXR Mode HDR and SNR separately. There is no point of buying this camera if its EXR modes are not used with it! If I am buying that camera again, it will be for these special modes on EXR sensor.

Reply

Added by hoodlum |  January 17, 2012

HR mode was tested

You can tell by comparing the Print vs Screen modes.  The print mode results are scaled to 8mp for all sensors.  The screen mode is the per pixel results. 

All recent sensor results drop when going from Print to Screen mode as they have more than 8mp.  The X10 was no exception so that shows the test was done at 12mp (HR).  If one of the EXR 6mp modes had been used then the results would have improved when going from Print to Screen.

I too wished they had test the 6mp DR400 mode for this sensor.  They can easily manually select it under Program mode by changing the Image Size and the DR.  Then we could compare the 6mp vs 12mp results.

Reply

Added by darrask |  January 17, 2012

SN, SR or HR?

Very well, the X10 beats other compacts. But how were the scores calculated? Best SNR is achieved in 6MP SN more, and best dynamic range is obtained in 6MP SR score.
Though it is quite surprising there is no word on this! Not even an explanation how the sensor works, only the layout is shown.

Reply