Tests and reviews for the lens Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-50mm f3.5-6.3 EZ
Measurements and specifications
| Announced | 2011-12-14 |
| Indicative price (USD) | 499 |
| Aperture | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Focal range (mm) | 12 - 50 |
| Filter diameter (mm) | 52 |
| Max diameter (mm) | 57 |
| Mount type | Micro 4/3 |
| Stabilization | No |
| AF Motor | High-speed Imager AF (MSC) |
| Zoom type | Ring |
| Rotating front element | |
| Tripod mount | No |
| Color | Black, silver |
| Full-Time manual focus | |
| Number of lenses | 10 |
| Number of groups | 9 |
| Diaphragm blades | 5 |
| Circular aperture | Yes |
| Length (mm) | 83 |
| Weight (gr) | 211 |
Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
in P-Mpix
in EV
in EV
in micrometer
Further readings for the Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-50mm f3.5-6.3 EZ
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
The Micro 4:3 market is full of technology, each new generation apparently having some new enhancement, with a new, more superlative name. Panasonic is no different, but this new Lumix G VARIO 14-42 f3.5-5.6 II Asph. Mega OIS carries neither the ‘Power Zoom’, or the ‘Power O.I.S’; there are aspheric elements but no ED glass. Without all the latest refinements is it worth having at all? Yes, it is: well priced and punches above its weight. |
|
Designed with compactness in mind, micro 4/3 lenses go for the smallest size possible most of the time. But to achieve these dimensions, they sometimes have to compromise on image quality. In this review, we cover a wide range of standard lenses, both prime and zoom, and show that not all lenses are equal in terms of the trade-off between compactness and image quality. |
|
After its great success over the past several years in refurbishing its PEN line, Olympus is continuing its quest for innovation by updating other legendary cameras of the past. |
Comments
