| Announced | 2004-08-01 |
| Indicative price (USD) | 845 |
| Aperture | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Focal range (mm) | 10 - 22 |
| Filter diameter (mm) | 77 |
| Max diameter (mm) | 83.5 |
| Mount type | Canon EF-S |
| Stabilization | No |
| AF Motor | USM |
| Zoom type | Ring |
| Rotating front element | No |
| Tripod mount | No |
| Color | Black |
| Full-Time manual focus | Yes |
| Number of lenses | 13 |
| Number of groups | 10 |
| Diaphragm blades | 6 |
| Circular aperture | Yes |
| Length (mm) | 89.8 |
| Weight (gr) | 385 |





To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
The annual CP+, or Camera and Photo Imaging Show, takes place in Japan, the heartland of the photography hardware industry. With new lenses covering wide-angle through to extreme super-telephoto and options for all the different Interchangeable lens mounts and camera systems, this year’s show, seemed to be all about new glass for your cameras in 2013. We pick out and preview 11 lenses that caught our eye. |
|
The Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM, which came out in March 2009, completes Sigma’s Pro (EX) line. |
|
As we continue our survey of wide-angle lenses currently on the market, let’s take a look at the Tokina AT-X 11-16mm PRO DX on a Nikon D7000 and on a Canon EOS 7D. |
|
Announced at PMA 2009, the Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM Canon wide-angle zoom lens features a constant f/3.5 maximum aperture (EX) and is equipped with a hypersonic motor (HSM). |
|
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, a very light and small equivalent to a 16-35mm on a 35mm camera, is well suited for landscape or indoor photography. For example, the non-rotating front element eases the use of polarizing and graduated filters, which are very popular for landscape photography. It is to be noticed that this wide angle zoom can focus at a distance down to 24 cm. Its Super UD glass lens and its two aspherical elements perform should give it a good image quality. Let's see if the DxOMark measures confirm this. |
|
|
Added by inasir1971 |
March 25, 2012
This is a terrible lens - at a very high price for what it's worth
Buy only if you need it (e.g. taking photos of interiors). I have had one for 1 1/2 years and it is only good enough for applications such as I mentioned above or for down-sampling for time-lapse videos. This is not a lens to use for prints.
Reply |