Latest news and press reviews about DxOMark test results
Here you can find all of DxOMark's measurement publishing announcements, along with a selection of reviews, print and blog articles from the photo press and communities that talk about DxOMark or reference DxOMark results.
|
There are new additions to the DxOMark Samyang lens database with these two 14mm lenses. |
|
The new entry level Canon kit lens has been tested by DxOMark and the results are now available. |
|
The Nikon D5100 replaces the D5000 in Nikon’s lineup; it finds its place right below the Nikon D7000, according to Nikon’s marketing the D90 is still positioned between the D5100 and the D7000, however the spec sheet and the performances of the D5100 make this hard to believe. This is because the D5100 shares the same Sony 16 megapixels sensor as the D7000. The major difference between the two bodies being the AF: 11 points with 3D tracking for the D5100 (presumably the “old” MultiCam 1000 already used on the D90) versus the 39 points with 3D tracking now used on the D7000. Find out Nikon D5100's review results... |
|
We have the latest tests on the Nikon D5100 sensor. |
|
As you well know, DxOMark, the world leader in image quality analysis conducts scientific and independent testing on the latest camera sensor technology available. This time around we have Fujifilm's latest creation; the FinePix X100 an APS-C camera with an impressive array of features, and one of the most awaited products in its category. Find out Fujifilm FinePix X100's review results... |
|
APS-C sensor, 23mm non-movable fixed focal, great “Leica-like” design... here are the measurements for one the most anticipated cameras this spring - the Fuji X100. |
|
Here are the measurement results for the Samyang 85mm (Nikon and Canon mounts). |
|
Measurements for 4 additional lenses are now available, including the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM (Canon mount and Nikon mount). |
|
Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical [IF] tested on Canon and Nikon mount. Launched in 2003, this lens is still a very good choice if you are looking for a cheap standard zoom lens. See the comparisons against famous competitors: Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical [IF] Nikon Vs Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Vs Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED, here. |
|
Results are now available for 26 lenses tested on the Nikon D7000. In addition to the Carl Zeiss lenses (see article here), other tested lenses include the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5–5.6G ED VR and the AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5–5.6G ED VR. You can also compare the behavior of numerous Nikon fixed focal lenses on the D7000 with their behavior on the Nikon D300s and Nikon D90 (see, for example, the Nikon AF-Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D). |
|
The Samsung NX11 Sensor measurements are very close to its predecessor the Samsung NX10 and NX100. See the comparison NX11 vs NX10 vs NX100. For other interesting comparison with its main competitors, see NX11 vs Sony NEX5 vs Olympus PEN EPL2. |
|
Carl Zeiss is one of those almost mythical lens makers. Focusing on quality, its lenses almost always rely on complex optical formulas. Their price reflects this involvement in quality, and logically Zeiss lenses are on the same shelves as the very high-end Canon or Nikon models. The review is available here. |
|
Older but still interesting! You can see the DxOMark test results for the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED and the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II USM. |
|
Test results for the two 100mm Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM and EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM are now available on DxOMark.com. We’ve also compared the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM vs. the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs. the Sony 100mm F2.8 Macro (see results here). |
|
The study of this group of 14 Zeiss lenses is interesting in many aspects. One of the questions arising after such an analysis is more than obvious: is high-end always the best choice? The review is available here. |
|
In-depth test results for Carl Zeiss lenses now available on DxOMark.
|
|
The EOS 1100D (Rebel T3) replaces the EOS 1000 as Canon’s entry-level body. It combines a 12-megapixel sensor, Canon’s 9-point AF engine coupled to the 63-zone metering system introduced by the EOS7D, and of course the now-standard Digic 4 image processor. The review is available here. |
|
The EOS 600D looks much like the EOS 550D, which, however, it does not replace. Both bodies will remain in Canon’s lineup. The 600D utilizes most of the 550D’s hardware features, including its 18-megapixel sensor; it adds an articulated screen, along with the “beginners” functions and creative filters first seen on the EOS 60D. The review is available here. |
|
To website |
Sony sensor beats the Canon sensor (DxOMark) De facto DxOMark proved that Sony do deliver a better image quality than Canon sensors... Read the article. Read the article |
|
To website |
Choosing between Canon EOS Rebel T3i, EOS Rebel T2i, 60D and 7D But don't take my word for it, don't be swayed by pixel peepers on forums, instead check out the camera sensor tests at DxOMark to verify this. As you can see, they all share the exact same overall score, and show very similar performance... Read the article. Read the article |
|
In-depth test results for Canon 600D and 1100D (pre-production model) now available on DxOMark:
|
|
To website |
PhotoRadar to use DxO Analyzer As part of the ongoing improvements to our testing regime we have invested in a new method of measuring a camera's dynamic range and image noise - DxO Analyzer... Read the article. Read the article |
|
To website |
Zeiss lenses: Nikon and Canon beat them Read the whole story from Pixiq. Read the article |
|
To website |
Nikon D7000 beats Canon 1D Mk IV on DxOMark Sensor Evaluation Hard to believe, but according to DxOMark, the Nikon D7000 takes the fight against the Canon 1D MkIV... Read the article. Read the article |