| Introduction | ISO sensitivity | Noise | Color sensitivity | Sharpness | Distortion | Light transmission | Vignetting | LCA |
Sharpness is based on the MTF measurement. Let’s start with a practical measurement experiment to help describe what MTF is. If we look at a series of black and white stripes with varying spatial frequency and fixed contrast (same reflectance ratio between black and white, independent of the spatial frequency), we can see that the image of high-frequency stripes has a lower contrast than that for low-frequency stripes. For very high frequencies, the image eventually becomes (almost) uniform, with an intermediate level between black and white, which our eyes perceive as a shade of gray.
The MTF precisely describes the contrast attenuation: for each spatial frequency, the MTF plots the ratio of the output modulation versus the test object modulation.
A MTF curve is represented above. The x-axis represents the spatial frequency in line pair per mm (here on the image sensor). The maximal attainable frequency on the sensor is called the Nyquist frequency and corresponds to alternating dark and bright lines one pixel wide. The y-axis (the MTF value) represents the contrast restitution for the corresponding spatial frequency. This value is between 0 and 100%, meaning complete obliteration or perfect restitution of the frequency, respectively.
The value of the MTF at frequency 0 is always 100% since a flat field is considered to have been reproduced perfectly, with no intensity loss. Attenuation due to lens transmission is measured separately.
MTF depends on light wavelength, field position, spatial orientation, focal length and aperture value.
DSLR lenses usually have a radial symmetry, which means that field dependency can be summarized by the MTF at different distances to the image center.
For the DxOMark sharpness score, we compute MTF in horizontal and vertical directions by examining the spatial response of the camera to a perfect edge. This measurement follows ISO standard 12233.
Any difference in MTF between the horizontal and the vertical directions is a sign of astigmatism.
Sharpness is a subjective quality attribute of an image or a lens. Sharpness indicates the visually perceived quality of details of an image or details reproduced by a lens. It is associated with both resolution and contrast of reproduced details (within an image or by a lens).
The DxOMark score for Sharpness is based on the Perceptual Megapixel (P-Mpix) concept that weights the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of the lens with the human visual acuity. Read more about Perceptual Megapixels.
An objective measure of sharpness which takes into account the sensitivity of the human visual system to specific spatial frequencies and the viewing distance of an image. Edge acutance refers to the ability of a photographic system to show a sharp edge between contiguous areas of low and high illuminance. Texture acutance refers to the ability of a photographic system to show details without noticeable degradations.
The resolution of a camera is defined by the size of the smallest detail that the camera can optically discriminate. ISO standard 12233 defines the limiting resolution as the first frequency such that the contrast attenuation is 95% (hence a MTF value of 5%). In practice, this value is very small and is also sensitive to measurement noise
Because of field aberrations (such as field curvature), the value of the limiting resolution and acutance depends on the field position.
We map the acutance on a color scale as a function of focal length and aperture value. We make measurements for several field positions.

We map the acutance in the image on a color scale, and make measurements for several focal lengths and aperture values.

We plot the acutance as a function of the radial field position, taking into consideration horizontal and vertical directions.
We make measurements for several focal lengths and aperture values.

To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
The Nikon D5000 and the Canon EOS 500D were two main releases for spring 2009. Launched at the same time, and targeting the same market, these two cameras were the perfect subjects to use for an extensive demonstration of the DxOMark Database. |
|
A detailed look at DxOMark's image quality testing protocols, including laboratory conditions and setup, methods, test-specific tools, and software that DxO Labs developed and uses to ensure scientific, bias-free data and repeatable results. |
|
On DxOMark, we evaluate and rank many types of digital cameras with image sensors that vary widely in pixel count, pixel size, and digital signal processing. To ensure that sensor performance comparisons between cameras are fair, it is very important both to test under identical shooting conditions and to take viewing conditions into account. |