| Announced | 2004-06-01 |
| Indicative price (USD) | 640 |
| Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Focal range (mm) | 105 |
| Filter diameter (mm) | 58 |
| Max diameter (mm) | 74 |
| Mount type | Nikon F FX |
| Stabilization | No |
| AF Motor | No |
| Zoom type | / |
| Rotating front element | No |
| Tripod mount | No |
| Color | Black |
| Full-Time manual focus | No |
| Number of lenses | 11 |
| Number of groups | 10 |
| Diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Circular aperture | No |
| Length (mm) | 95 |
| Weight (gr) | 450 |





To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Sigma’s 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM zoom won praise for its balance of performance and convenience, but it looked bulky after rival Tamron introduced the diminutive 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD. Reducing the size, and weight while updating the optical construction to allow a new minimum focus distance of 35cm, the 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM is Sigma’s response. But has the redesign compromised the optical performance, or is it a valuable addition to the range? Read on to discover our verdict. |
|
We have just tested both the Canon and Nikon versions of the Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM lens, announced on February 8, 2011. |
|
We have just tested the Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO on both Canon and Nikon mounts, giving us the opportunity to review the performance of all the lenses in this category (though we’re waiting for the results of the latest Sigma 105mm f 2.8 EX DG OS, which should come our way soon!). |
|
|
Added by aciamax |
October 12, 2012
Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG Macro for Nikon [Flickr.com group]
My photos [Flickr Group] at : http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma105/ ... [Nikon mount].
Users of this lens invited to post their photos. I have found this lens excellent for flower macros using Aperture setting on my Nikon D80.For flowers in pot plants, I use manual focus and a tripod. Reply |