| Introduction | Distagon T18mm f/3.5 | Distagon T21mm f/2.8 | Distagon T25mm f/2.8 | Distagon T28mm f/2 | Distagon T35mm f/2 | Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 | Planar T50mm f/1.4 | Planar T 85mm f/1.4 | Makro Planar T 100mm f/2 |
Makro Planar T 50mm f/2
CANON MOUNT
This lens belongs to the same Makro-Planar family as the 100mm we have also examined, and it is as reliable as the 100mm.
Sharp, it is gifted with very good light transmission, the T value being almost equal to the F value. Here again, this is a lens showing very little distortion, little vignetting and almost no chromatic aberration when coupled with an APS-C sensor.
It achieves its best DxOMark low-light score at f/2 on an EOS 7D, and f/2.8 on full-frame body.
Logically, this 50mm is a wonderful lens for portraits on both APS-C and full-frame sensors. On a full-frame body, again, this 50mm is very versatile, proving quite good for landscape shooting, and excellent for reportage.
On a full-frame sensor (EOS 1Ds MkIII):
The Makro-Planar T 50mm f/2 ZE has an extremely sharp center (above 60lp/mm) from f/2.8 to f/8. Closing to f/8 widens the central very sharp zone, but the edges always remain good. Beyond f/8, the center of the field map is softened and loses definition.
Vignetting is noticeable when the lens is fully opened, but stopping down to f/4 makes it disappear.
On an APS-C sensor (EOS 7D)
On an APS-C sensor, the definition is quite good fully opened, although the edges are much softer. Stopping down to f/2.8 makes the resolution much more regular: at f/5.6 the field is good everywhere on the map, and above 50lp/mm.
Vignetting isn’t a problem as soon as the lens is stopped down to f/2.8.
Comparison 1:
Zeiss Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 ZE Canon v. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Comparison 2:
Zeiss Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 ZE Canon v. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
NIKON MOUNT
Good for portraits, reportage and landscapes when mounted on a full-frame body, this 50mm is very sharp, produces very few chromatic aberrations, and shows almost no distortion. Its best low-light performance is achieved at f/2.8, although it has to be stopped down to f/4 on full-frame and to f/5.6 on APS-C to reach its best mid-light score.
On a full-frame sensor (D3X):
Full aperture provides a clear central zone over 50lp/mm, while the edges remain a bit softer. Stopping down the lens gradually improves the center and the sides, but the center is always sharper than the sides.
Vignetting is strong at f/2, but gradually disappears as the lens is stopped down. At f/4, only the corners are darker, and at f/5.6, vignetting is gone.
On an APS-C sensor (D300s):
On a smaller sensor, the scenario is almost the same, except that one has to stop down the lens to f/5.6 to achieve the best resolution for this lens. Wider apertures show very soft edges.
Visible on the external one-third of the field when the lens is wide opened, vignetting simply disappears 1 stop later and at f/2.8, it is invisible.
Comparison 1:
Zeiss Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 ZF2 v. Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.4D
Comparison 2:
Zeiss Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 ZF2 v. Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.8D
Comparison 3:
Zeiss Makro Planar T 50mm f/2 ZF2 v. Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.4G
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Carl Zeiss is one of those almost mythical lens makers. Focusing on quality, its lenses almost always rely on complex optical formulas. Their price reflects this involvement in quality, and logically Zeiss lenses are on the same shelves as the very high-end Canon or Nikon models. The review is available here. |