| Introduction | Preview | Measurement | Comparisons | Conclusion |
A growing chorus of amateur and enthusiast photographers have been wondering aloud if a full-frame sensor would ever find its way into a more compact, intuitive, and consumer-oriented camera body – and equally important, a price range that won’t induce heartburn.
Nikon and Canon both seem to have their fingers on the pulse of consumer preferences. On Sept. 13, Nikon announced the arrival of the D600, a consumer-targeted DSLR that includes a 24.3-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor. And on Sept. 17, Canon rebuffed Nikon’s D600 announcement with an equally impressive consumer-minded full-frame DSLR, the EOS 6D.
Further examining the D600, its sensor is embedded into a camera body that most resembles – in design and weight – the company’s more veteran high-end consumer DSLR, the D7000. However, its dimensions and its image production are more closely aligned to Nikon’s 36-megapixel full-frame sensor DSLR, the D800.
For starters, perspective D600 users will enjoy the full-frame sensor’s 35mm film-like appeal. The camera allows amateur photographers to break free from the cropping-factor that is typical of smaller sensors found in consumer DSLRs like the D7000, hybrid cameras, and DSCs.
And the price tag? The D600 costs just shy of $2,100 – enough to still give some photographers stomach churning anxiety – and places it in price range and direct competition with Sony’s $2,000 full-frame high-end DSLR, the a850, and is just a few pennies more than Canon’s new EOD 6D. Still, the D600 is priced well below the most affordable Nikon or Canon full-frame sensor DSLRs, including the roughly $3,000 Nikon D800, or the $3,450 Canon 5D Mark III.
Nikon justifies the D600 retail price for its obvious 24.3-mpx full-frame sensor, but also because the camera can photograph at a snappy and nimble 5.5-frames-per-second, and it includes a 39-point autofocus system, has a D800 sized 3.2-inch 921k-dot LCD screen, and is capable of filming 1080p30 full HD video with accompanying stereo sound recording.
Other perks of the D600 include:
The D600 likely will appeal to two very different types of photographers. Enthusiast photographers will be drawn to its intuitive functionality, creative features and filters, and its full-frame sensor. Professional photographers will be attracted to the latter, and could consider the D600 as a lightweight and affordable compliment to their broader and heavier pool of camera gear.
This blurring of camera genres situates the D600 in a unique place among the broader Nikon family. The D600 could potentially replace the 12.3-mpx “DX” sensor format of the Nikon D300S – the latter has been billed as the company’s top “DX” camera and the entry-level pro-DSLR model. Yet, the D600’s full-format “FX” CMOS sensor easily trumps the D300S, and is more closely related to the semi-pro Nikon D700 and its 12.1-mpx “FX” sensor. Even still, the megapixel count of the D600 is more than double that of the D700. This leaves many to wonder, even us at DxOMark, if this consumer-marketed DSLR will eclipse the image quality of the D300S and D700, and potentially approach the image quality of the 36-mpx D800.
|
|
Added by Obelcoo |
May 16
Sony A99
Ok,
Cool for Canon 5d III Nikon D800 and D600. But, when with the Sony a99? Thanks Reply |
|
|
Added by Tord |
March 15
Nikon 600 back from the cleaners :-)!
Got my D600 back from Nikon a few days ago, with a note telling me it isn't dust-proof! Water-resistant, yes, but not dust-proof?! Guarding their backs, I guess ...
I love it anyway! I'm sure it will have some more dust problems in the future, who cares?! A fantastic camera for me, a poor enthusiast, who sold my beloved Pentax gear to buy this lovely baby! Today I have a nice setup for it: the 28/1.8, the 50/1.4G and the 85/1.8G, plus the Sigma 70 macro, and two classics: 400/5.6 and 80-200/4. If I need a 35 I'll use the DX lens, works quite well (needs some cropping, but not that much)! And I have the AF-S VR 70-300, too, but is more or less is glued to the V1. So no zooms on my D600 (sold the 18-70 & 55-200 today), except that supersharp old 80-200 manual lens! This oil/dust issue isn't nearly as bad as that happened to a lot of K-5 owners, including me (mine was minor, didn't need to send it off)! Just tried the 28/1.8G I bought today on it - smooth! Reply |
|
|
Added by deepakv2u |
March 04
Worst Nikon Camera
I was very happy and excited as it was my first full frame camera, but the sensor dust ruined my camera and my hopes of producing better images, even after cleaning i still see sensor spots on my images when i use it for landscape photography. I am not talking of one or two spots but around 25 to 30 dust spots even after cleaning. Please do not buy this camera, Thanks Nikon for ruining my hopes and ambition.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Istvan Lörincz |
March 08
Re: Worst Nikon Camera
Hi there!
deepakv2u: Can you tell me how you got these 30-35 dust spots on your sensor? I am taking pictures for years as a pro photographer and never had any dust spots on my sensor. How come you got so many on yours in that short time?? Thx. All the best, Istvan Reply |
|
|
Added by oasis888 |
February 25
Nikon's not getting my money on this one!
24MP looked so good, I was ready to jump. But the dirt/grease issue hasn't gone away and now some people are not even having major issues until after 2700 clicks?
After reading Tom Hogan's latest threads http://www.bythom.com/, I'm staying with my D700, D5100 & D300, none of which have ever caused me a second of worry. NIKON...fix it or forget it! Reply |
|
|
Added by lothellom |
January 11
D600 video bad compression
Hi, we are making tests with low light ISO 100 and have found very bad compression errors in this camera. Will soon upload a lot more images. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W68p6PAiR9A ¿does anyone have information about this?
Reply |
|
|
Added by funniq |
October 13, 2012
D600 overexposes just like the D7000
I saw some real life test on the www about the fact that the D600 overexposes. That was the reason why I sold my D7000 and use my 'old' D90.
Can anyone explain me why this D600 with such a bad exposure algorithm gets such a good score on DxOMark ... I almost wonder if Nikon sponsors this site???? ;-) Kind regards, André Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Nerval |
October 24, 2012
Re: D600 overexposes just like the D7000Quote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Nikon/D600">this page on the website</a></div>I saw some real life test on the www about the fact that the D600 overexposes. That was the reason why I sold my D7000 and use my 'old' D90. Can anyone explain me why this D600 with such a bad exposure algorithm gets such a good score on DxOMark ... I almost wonder if Nikon sponsors this site???? ;-) Kind regards, André Might be because DXO Tests the sensor raw output and not the camera. And the sensor is indeed very good. As for your problem with the D7000, it is not really a problem, new sensors are tuned up to be more sensitive. So using base iso like 200 or 100 is often pulled, and not the real sensor ISO, so it tends to "over expose", but that's the idea getting more photons in order to get more information on the darker areas of the image and so less noise. Knowing that, if you're shooting raw, you are able to recover about a stop and a half of highlights dynamic range anyway (except if the highlights are really blown up), so it's all right. If you dislike the output and do not wish to toy with the raw, just use the center weighed average measure, aim at your subject and use AEL to lock the exposure setting and compensate by minus 0.7 ev it should do the trick. Just a question of getting used to the gear. Anyway for careful exposure, nothing is more reliable than a spot or an area measure, global average measure are rarely good, either too conservative or to prone to highlights clipping. IMO Reply |
|
|
Added by DinoBravo |
December 03, 2012
Re: D600 overexposes just like the D7000
Wow go Nikon go!!! HA HA Trouble is it's not real world.
How does DXO explain low light performance when the 600 is bad @ iso 3200 and not usable after that?? and they say its basically the best W T F ? No good DXO, even your own tests show different to you results and scores. Oh no Nikon dose not do well no worries we'll post it as the BEST - yeah ;D The 800 again noise is worse than others and all that res ? what did they do with it? Every real world testing and my own tells and shows why Nikon are cheaper and why they are semi pro cameras. DXO should put the coolpix camera as top dog ! score of 120 ha ha Reply |
|
|
Added by gkanitz |
December 05, 2012
Re: D600 overexposes just like the D7000
1) The tendency to overexpose cannot be judged by some images published on the internet. Unless the images were taken under controlled conditions the result reflects the knowledge of the user more than the qualities of a camera. If you want real world tests of the D600 and other cameras I suggest you look at www.dpreview.com
2) Correct exposure is a function of the camera's light meter system not the sensor. A camera with the worst sensor in the world could have the most accurate metering system and produce perfectly exposed images, albeit of limited quality due to the bad sensor. The opposite situation is also possible. 3) Regardless of the DXO mark, the only real test for a camera is in the hands of the user. There is no “bad” camera among current crop of advanced semi-pro and professional DSLR’s no matter what make you look at. The decision comes down to which feature sets at a given budget are the best fit for your specific needs. At any one time there will always be one manufacturer that has just leapfrogged the rest and be at the top of technical ratings like DXO Mark, but the real world implications of this are for 99,9% of the photographers out there, just a curiosity, not relevant in real world terms. 4) Last but not least I'll tell you my personal experience with the D600. After 4 years using a D300 which is a fantastic camera I switched to a D600 and it is so much better than the D300 as to consider it in a different league. And BTW it does not overexpose. It has the most accurate meter I have had to date. My previous cameras have been D100, D80 and D300. Reply |
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
September 24, 2012
Nikon D600
Canon is loosing the game !!!
I`m interesting where is test of A99??? seems Sony will be worse than D600 just like Sony A77vs. Nikon D3200, translusent mirror is good only for video, why Sony managers don`t understand it ???????????? Sony A580 is almost same as Nikon D7000, but A57&A55 are worse. Sony please produce DSLR for foto too, not only for video ! ----------------------------------------------------------- http://photo-wed.blogspot.com/ Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by DXOMARK |
September 24, 2012
Re: Nikon D600
Can DXOMark be trusted at all in the first place ? !
Are their results biased, falsified or bribed ? It seems that the results favors Nikon/Canon and pushes down on Sony ! WHY ? >:( :( Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
September 27, 2012
Re: Nikon D600
@DXOMARK No, DXOMark (the website) has always very good results for Sony non SLT cameras. Their NEX range are among highest rated. SLT has an evil dark mirror that is causing loads of noise kick in. Nothing wrong with the sensor itself. If you like Sony and hate higher noise on SLT, try NEX .. NEX6 came with a a very good kit lens 16-50mm, very nice and compact. See NEX-5 (any variant) or NEX-7 results, too good.
And no they are not favoring Canon, Canon FF and APSC DSlrs are always getting lower scores here comparative to Nikon or Pentax, for some obvious reasons. Also primarily because they are using Sony sensors. I still think there is something wrong with their test setup, which exagarate on some parameters too much?!? maybe! Reply |
|
|
Added by RJA4000 |
September 20, 2012
Where is the 1DX test ?
<div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Nikon/D600">this page on the website</a></div>OK, I know, one more... But, seriously, why to test D600 and not 1DX ?
Wouldn't it be wise to publish in advance some test schedule ? So we know what to expect and (approx.) when. Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Eisenbahnfotograf |
September 21, 2012
In der Tat...
...die D600 gibt es seit einer Woche, schon ist sie getestet.
Die 1Dx gibt es viele Monate - wo bleibt der Test dieser Kamera? Reply |
|
|
Added by h.malik |
September 19, 2012
THIS CAMERA IS NOT AFFORDABLE FOR CONSUMERS !
Dont know whats behind this silly politics from nikon ...........
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by My Self |
September 20, 2012
Re: THIS CAMERA IS NOT AFFORDABLE FOR CONSUMERS !Quote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Nikon/D600">this page on the website</a></div>Dont know whats behind this silly politics from nikon ........... Who said it was "affordable for consumers"? It's affordable to high end enthusiasts. Reply |
|
|
Added by BeepBeep2 |
November 16, 2012
Re: THIS CAMERA IS NOT AFFORDABLE FOR CONSUMERS !Quote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Nikon/D600">this page on the website</a></div>Dont know whats behind this silly politics from nikon ........... Are you crazy? This camera beats out the Canon 5D MKIII in price by a longshot and matches it in performance. The Canon 5D MKII is still selling for 1.5K to 2K USD, the price of the D600. The MKII was THE De-facto "budget" full frame DSLR. You think Nikon is doing people a disservice here?... Reply |
|
|
Added by effonepointfour |
November 17, 2012
Re: THIS CAMERA IS NOT AFFORDABLE FOR CONSUMERS !
Really? I'm a consumer and I'm ordering one This coming Tuesday...So what does that say. ;D
Reply |
|
|
Added by slupix |
September 19, 2012
D600: please, stop calling it affordable!
I don't know about you guys, but I am really fed up of reading about this being an "affordable full frame camera". It sells for around 2000 pounds! It is more than twice the price of the D7000. It is affordable to whom? It's a great camera and I wish I could own one. But please, stop trying to convince people that they can afford it.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by DXOMARK |
September 19, 2012
Re: D600: please, stop calling it affordable!
I think they are trying to say in the world of full frame DSLR cameras, Nikon D600 is indeed the cheapest and also the smallest in size.
And as we just found out, the camera sensor performance is also EXCELLENT ! Perhaps we can start saving today. LOL ! ;D Reply |
|
|
Added by rixirox |
September 25, 2012
Re: D600: please, stop calling it affordable!
Okay, affordable is relative.
However, if you are learning or working your way up the Nikon system you can eventually afford this. Watch me now. Buy a D300S on ebay. Learn and earn on it for a year then resell it on ebay. Then take your money and add some of your set aside earnings or Paypal surplus from selling off "good but no longer fun stuff" and buy the next camera level up. It will take you some time. How much time really depends on you and your pace of earning, doing and selling. Just keep it going until you get where you want to go. Basically, it comes down to how much of an enthusist are you or just how bad do you want this? Anything is do-able if you set your mind to it. I have been doing this since 2008 and I just received my new D800E last week. I knew nothing of Digital photography 4 yrs ago, so I took a course at NYIP and bought an entry level Nikon D40 kit. I started out as a broke enthusiastic Nikon newbee and four years later I am still broke but now a Nikon addict with a new D800E. See my point?! So ask yourself "just how bad do I want this camera"? Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
September 25, 2012
Re: D600: please, stop calling it affordable!
@rixirox hehe .. this is a new definition of addordability indeed!
however, see it in another way, get a D600 and a general purpose zoom lens like for 24-70mm, get it from tamron if you wanna save few 100$ and add VR to it. Its apperture is 2.8 which is same as 1.4 on m43 (my system of choice). At f2.8 it will give you same shallow DOF and with the high ISO advantage (atleast as DXOMark is advocating) you will get atleast 1 EV advantage. That means better than 3 prime lenses on m43. I am not considering level of sharpness or CA, vig and other parameter (in my opinion, no one can beat m43 on those optical ground). So add up all the cost of 3 top prime lenses, OMD and compare it with roughly 3000$ D600 kit with tamron VR 24-70! :)) Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Nikon’s recently released consumer-oriented full-frame sensor DSLR, the D600, has just gone through DxOMark’s image quality evaluation tests. And the verdict is in: the D600 is an affordable camera that places a high premium on image quality, as it ranks just behind the top performing Nikon D800 and Nikon D800E. It is also a significant improvement over the high-end professional flagship DSLRs, the Nikon D3X and the Nikon D4. Here are the DxOMark test results for the D600. |