Item added to your selection
Tests and reviews for the lens Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm f2.8
Measurements and specifications
| Announced | 2009-06-01 |
| Indicative price (USD) | 300 |
| Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Focal range (mm) | 17 |
| Filter diameter (mm) | 37 |
| Max diameter (mm) | 57 |
| Mount type | Micro 4/3 |
| Stabilization | No |
| AF Motor | DC |
| Zoom type | / |
| Rotating front element | No |
| Tripod mount | No |
| Color | Black or silver |
| Full-Time manual focus | Yes |
| Number of lenses | 6 |
| Number of groups | 4 |
| Diaphragm blades | 5 |
| Circular aperture | Yes |
| Length (mm) | 22 |
| Weight (gr) | 71 |
Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
in P-Mpix
Focal:
Aperture:
Focal:
in EV
in EV
Focal:
Aperture: - - - - -
in micrometer
Further readings for the Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm f2.8
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
Lens Review
|
March 28, 2012
|
In this review of micro 4/3 wide-angle lenses, we will cover both prime and zoom lenses to give you an good overview of how manufacturers managed to design good-quality lenses in a small form-factor for these focal ranges. |
Lens Review
|
February 27, 2012
|
Continuing with our tests on micro 4/3 lenses, today we take another look at an older (2009) pancake lens, the Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm f/2.8. Very compact and light-weight, the 17mm f/2.8 was one of the very first lenses specifically designed for micro 4/3 cameras. |
Comments
|
Added by anentropic |
March 01, 2012
There is another choice?
On the front page for the review of this lens (http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Micro-Four-Third-Lens-Reviews/Olympus-M.Zuiko-Digital-17mm-f-2.8) you say something that doesn't make sense.
In the opening paragraphs describing this lens it says "very compact and light-weight design - only 22mm long and weighing only 71g" Later on you say "Unfortunately for those who would like to use an ultra-compact, light-weight pancake lens, there really aren’t any other choices yet — even from Panasonic" But on your page for the Panasonic 14mm it gives: Length (mm) 20.5 Weight (gr) 55 ...making that lens more-compact and lighter than the Olympus 17mm. Arguably better optically too, but we'll have to wait for your test of course :) Reply |