More cameras

Brand


















 

Tests and reviews for the camera Samsung NX 200

Measurements and specifications

Samsung NX 200
To compare this camera:   

DxOMark Sensor Scores

[?]
Overall Score[?]
69
Portrait
(Color Depth)[?]
22.6 bits
Landscape
(Dynamic Range)[?]
12.6 Evs
Sports
(Low-Light ISO)[?]
618 ISO

View how the Samsung NX 200 camera rates at the DxOMark Score

Type Hybrid 
Announced 2011-09-01 
Indicative price (USD) 899  
Sensor type CMOS 
Resolution 5528 x 3662  
Sensor photo detectors (Mpix) 20.24  
Sensor size (mm) 15.7 x 23.5 
Color filter array RGB 
Pixel pitch (µm) 4.25  
Bits per pixel 12.0 
Focal length multiplier 1.50 
Aspect Ratio 3:2 
ISO latitude  100 - 12800 
Shutter type Mechanical 
Fastest - Slowest speed (s) 1/4000 - 30.0  
Frame rate (fps) 7.0  
Live view  Yes 
Stabilization  No 
Firmware  
Dust cleaningYes 
Mount typeSamsung NX  
Weight (gr) 0  
Battery type Li-ion, BP1030, 1030mAh 
Battery weight (gr) 0 
Tropicalization No 
Camera material Metal and plastic 
Mount material Metal and plastic 
View finder type No viewfinder 
View finder magnification 0 
View finder coverage 0 
Mirror lockup  
View finder diopter  
Monitor type Oled 
Monitor size 3 
Monitor pixel 614000 
Articulated screen No 
Touch screen No 
Contrast screen 0 
Low-pass filter  
Focus mode Yes 
Autofocus modes Single AF, Continuous AF 
Number of autofocus points 35 
Exposure bracketing 3 frames up to +/- 3.0 EV 
Exposure compensation + or - 3 EV (1/3EV step) 
Drive modes Single, Continuous High (7fps), Continuous Low (3fps), Burst (10/15 or 30fps, up to 30 shots per shutter press, 1.4 MP), Self-timer (2-30 seconds in 1 sec increments), Exposure Bracket, WB Bracket, Picture Wizard Bracket 
Buffer size 11 (JPG), 8(RAW) 
Recording medium SD, SDHC, SDXC 
Image format JPEG, RAW (SRW) 
White balance bracketing Yes 
Connectivity USB 2.0 (High Speed), Video Out (NTSC / PAL), HDMI (1080i, 720P, 576P/480P) 
Bluetooth No 
3G No 
Sound recording Yes 
External micro  
Histogram Yes 
GPS  
Video Yes 
Maximum format image video 1920 x 1080 / 30 fps 
Full HD Yes 
Live autofocus  
Video file format MP4 
Video codec H.264 
Video stabilisation  

Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
Color response
Sensitivity metamerism index
ISO 17321 		82
 
White balance scales R raw 2.7
G raw 1
B raw 1.91
 
    R sRGB G sRGB B sRGB
Color matrix as defined in ISO standard 17321 R raw 1.72 -0.64 -0.07
G raw -0.11 1.33 -0.22
B raw 0.06 -0.51 1.45

Full Color Sensitivity: Noise covariance ellipses in CIE 1931 Lab color space
Select ISO : 100
(ISO are manufacturer ISO)
 
Select luminance : 30








Currently no lens has been tested mounted on this camera

Further readings for the Samsung NX 200

To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.

Camera Review  |  February 27
Samsung NX20 review - A great performance among stiff competition

The Samsung NX20 is a good ‘Hybrid’ APS-C camera, it is a pretty good APS-C camera, and actually it’s not a bad camera by any standards! Unfortunately for the Samsung it is surrounded by other good cameras and needs something special to make it not just a good camera but a successful camera.
Camera Review  |  February 26
Samsung NX200 review – A hybrid with purpose

Launched in September 2011, the Samsung NX200 marks a significant point in the NX line because it features an all-new APS-C CMOS sensor with 20.3megapixels. Among the hybrid cameras, this is about as big as sensors currently get, so Samsung are aiming at the high ground, a fact confirmed by the premium feel all-metal body – a first in the NX-series.

Comments
Added by ContaxRTS3 |  March 02

Incomplete comparison

It is become a sad joke... What about Fuji ? There are out for a long time, and the only ones not to be tested. What's wrong ? Where is your credibility with such a miss ?

Reply  | Read all replies for this comment

First replies for this comment
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |  March 04

Re: Incomplete comparison

Hi,

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark.

If you are referring to the Fuji X cameras, you probably know that they do not use a Bayer matrix but a “X-Trans” matrix. We will try to test this sensor, but although we try to respond to your requests to provide tests for specific camera models, there are no plans for doing it in the short term.

Best regards,

The DxOMark Team

Reply
Added by ContaxRTS3 |  March 05

Re: Incomplete comparison

Hi,

Thanks for answering. I don't know the details of your protocol, but I don't understand why the X-trans matrix prevents you to test it in usual way.
Still, this fact means than no APS-C format product from Fuji can be tested, which is sad.

But, again, thanks for the reply.

Reply
Added by iamsam |  February 27

11 lenses including 3 pancakes

To set the record straight - there are 11 current NX lenses including 3 pancakes. One wonders when this article was actually written...

Reply  | Read all replies for this comment

First replies for this comment
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |  March 05

Re: 11 lenses including 3 pancakes

Hello,

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark.

The NX lenses are now planned so the first results should be available in few week.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team

Reply
Added by lastras |  February 27

Ouch

Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse

Reply  | Read all replies for this comment

First replies for this comment
Added by Toshik |  February 27

Re: Ouch

Quote:

<div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Samsung/NX-200">this page on the website</a></div>Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse
maybe high iso is noisy but color depth and dynamic range are not bad among the cameras in this segment.

Reply
Added by iamsam |  February 27

Re: Ouch

Quote:

<div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Samsung/NX-200">this page on the website</a></div>Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse

The score seems to say otherwise ... compared to other mirrorless cameras announced in the same period of time (many months ago, by the way) only the NEX sensor was better.

Reply