| Introduction | Measurement | Comparison | Conclusion |
Before we take a look at the lens, we should just recap on the Sony RX1’s sensor performance, which by all accounts was a stunning result. The RX1 has the best performing sensor of any high-end compact or mirrorless camera in our database and indeed comes just behind the Nikon D800/D800E and D600 DSLRs.
The individual scores speak for themselves. The high Portrait score of 25.1 bits is ahead of the Nikon D3x and equal to the new D600, while the huge Dynamic Range of 14.3 Ev is only bettered by the Nikon D800. The Sports (Low-light ISO) use case score is also impressive but it can’t quite reach the same lofty positions of the Nikons. It places the RX1 6th overall in that category, just in front of the inspiring full-frame Canon EOS 6D.
With a high overall DxOMark score of 33, the Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* is a superb performer optically. That score puts it comfortably ahead of the $1,850 manual focus Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 1.4/35 (35mm f/1.4) on a Nikon D3X, which achieved a DxOMark score of 30.
That wasn’t the only 35mm f/1.4 lens that achieved that score, though. The manual focus Samyang AS UMC and the new autofocus Sigma DG HSM model also attained an overall DxOMark score of 30 when measured on a D3x and Canon EOS 5D Mk II, respectively.
Individual metrics show the fixed Sonnar of the RX1 to have excellent sharpness, measured at high 18P-Mpix in our labs. The Zeiss Distagon T 35mm f/2 ZE Canon, a retro-focus design incorporating nine elements (with one lens made of low-dispersion glass) achieved a moderate 15P-Mpix score when measured on a Canon EOS 5D Mk II. However, at maximum aperture the sharpness could be improved across the field, it’s sharp in the centre but acutance falls away to the edges and corners.
Also bear in mind because the Sonnar is fixed, non-interchangeable lens we’re unable to measure Transmission. As a result, the overall DxOMark score doesn’t take that into account. A poor result could lower the score, but the opposite is also true.
Measured at 0.7%, the lens has some slight but still noticeable barrel distortion. It’s not complex, or ‘moustache’ type distortion and so it would be easy to correct in software.
Chromatic aberration is slightly higher than we might expect. Although it’s much lower than some high-grade zooms, for a modern prime it’s a slightly surprising result.
|
|
Added by maxb |
June 05
RX1 Sonnar lens mid zone dip
Hi there,
I was wondering if you noticed a mild mid zone dip with the RX1 lens? I just got the cam and the lens seems to dip slightly about 1/3 out from the centre. I also find that the corners are sharper than this area....? Cheers, Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
June 05
Re: RX1 Sonnar lens mid zone dip
Hello!
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. You can check the sharpness measurement for the RX1 lens here: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Camera-Lens-Database/Sony/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX1-Lens/%28camera%29/833/%28cameraname%29/SONY-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX1 You are right, sharpness is lower at 1/3 of the field. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by martigorn |
March 06
Sharpness at f2.0 vs f3.2
Hello,
I like the RX1 a lot, but center sharpness gets A LOT better when stopping down from f2.0 to f2.8 or f3.2. At 100% view, this is fully field relevant: Details and sharpness at 2.0 are okay, from 3.2 they are brilliant. I must admit to be somewhat disappointed by that. Does this practical view fit to Your lab results (which are somewhat abstract to me), i.e. is that "perfectly normal" or did I get a bad copy ? Yours sincerely Martin Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
March 08
Re: Sharpness at f2.0 vs f3.2
Hello Martin,
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. You are right but we would not say "a lot", as we measured a slight loss of sharpness at f/2.0 and we did not measure any significant difference between f/2.8 and f/4. To be convinced you should have a look to the acutance field map. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by birdred |
March 03
nice review
Thank you for the review. Looks to be a remarkable camera!
Though not really cross comparable, the Pentax K5 apsc dslr's measure an equally very healthy 14.3 EVS... until one can afford the sony the K5 is still pretty remarkable, especially for those like me on a budget. We live in a remarkable age to have so many great cameras and reviews at such an easy reach. Thanks again! Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
March 04
Re: nice review
Hello!
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark and your kind comment! Best regards, Reply |
|
|
Added by masuraotic |
February 23
DXO: What is selected for RX1's Transmission to decide it's SNR Score?
Hi!
I would like to know what is selected for RX1's Transmission Score to decide it's SNR. T = 2.1 or 2.0? And if the above selection is not correct, RX1's SNR Score may be changed? (E.g. If the selected value is 2.0 and the real value is 2.1, the total amount of the light, which reaches to Sensor in real value, is about 10% lower than the selected value) Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
February 25
Re: DXO: What is selected for RX1's Transmission to decide it's SNR Score?
Hello!
Thanks for your comment. You’re right regarding the potential bias. In the example you note, it could be close to 14% meaning less than ¼ of Stop. As we cannot measure the TStop on compact camera we decide to use the aperture, so in this case 2.0. Best regards, Emilie Reply |
|
|
Added by jorgemsoto |
February 12
DXO: How about the Lens on the RX1? Is it fully sharp on f2.0?
Hello!
I would like to know about the Lens on the RX1. The sharpness in F2.0??? Thanks! :) Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
February 15
Re: DXO: How about the Lens on the RX1? Is it fully sharp on f2.0?
Hi,
The RX1 lens will be reviewed very soon on dxomark.com, so stay tuned ! :) Regards, Emilie Reply |
|
|
Added by msatlas |
January 09
High ISO way better than Sony A99
What's up with the RX1 doing so much better than the A99 on the high ISO score? I thought they're supposed to have similar sensors but the RX1 seems to perform significantly better. Is that all chalked up to the A99's pellicle mirror?
Reply |
|
|
Added by Calistoga Tony |
January 09
Another mistake?
First it's saying that Sony uses BSI type image sensors in their dSLRs, (they don't, those are Exmor "R") and now the RX100 has an APS-C sensor? It doesn't. The RX100 uses a 1 inch sensor, like the Nikon 1 series.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by randybenter |
January 09
Re: Another mistake?
This is the RX1; it as an APS-C sensor.
The RX100 has a 1" sensor. Reply |
|
|
Added by darrask |
January 09
Re: Another mistake?
sorry lad, the RX1 is full-frame, not APS-C
Reply |
|
|
Added by darrask |
January 09
Re: Another mistake?
Sorry but... people are getting really confused here!!!
The RX1 has a full frame sensor, and the RX100 has a 1'' (one inch) sensor! Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
January 08
another fullframe camera review
Where is XTrans sensor camera? why not testing them? all the major review sites has pubslished their reviews ages ago.
and you call yourself "Camera Sensor" Only Analysts/ Experts? The first camera you should review is xpro1 last year! Don't know what's wrong with you guys!! Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by FredB |
January 10
Re: another fullframe camera reviewQuote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Sony/Cyber-shot-DSC-RX1">this page on the website</a></div>Where is XTrans sensor camera? why not testing them? all the major review sites has pubslished their reviews ages ago. and you call yourself "Camera Sensor" Only Analysts/ Experts? The first camera you should review is xpro1 last year! Don't know what's wrong with you guys!! Hi, The DxO mark team has answered to this question of their facebook page. Here it is : Quote: The Fuji X-Pro 1 and X-E1 sensor does not use a Bayer matrix, but rather a very different matrix whose pixels are arranged in rows of three colors — a technology called “X-Trans”, inspired by the naturally irregular distribution of silver halide crystals on film. As for the Fuji X10, XF1 and X-S1, they use a CMOS EXR sensor with yet another different arrangement.
The demosaicing algorithms of DxOMark lab that allow it to analyse digital camera RAW photo files were designed to process the output of sensors using the Bayer matrix. Testing these five Fuji cameras would necessitate completely rewriting our demosaicing algorithms to enable them to process the data received from this different matrix. Although DxO Labs tries to respond to photographers’ requests to provide test for specific camera models, there are no plans for testing these five Fuji cameras in the short term. Reply |
|
|
Added by bluevaping |
January 11
Re: another fullframe camera review
Time to start rewriting now. X Pro-1 and its successors are not going away.
Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Test results for the two 100mm Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM and EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM are now available on DxOMark.com. We’ve also compared the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM vs. the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED vs. the Sony 100mm F2.8 Macro (see results here). |