| Introduction | Measurement | Comparisons | Conclusion |
The Samsung NX 200 is in many ways a very capable camera. If you are not worried about shooting in low light, then the color depth and dynamic range will see it produce very high quality images whether you’re shooting portraits or landscapes. It’s only when the light levels fall that you’ll start to see the problems of ISO performance appear.
As is often the case in this market segment, it’s not always about the fine detail of camera image performance. So the inclusion of full HD video at 30p and the ability to shoot stills at 7 frames per second may well move the NX 200 to the top of the list. Samsung are also taking strides to provide a range of lenses to suit too. With 5 lenses in the current range, including two pancake models, there are several options available to you.
Equally, for many the look of the camera can be just as important. Here, the NX 200 scores well – the metal body looks handsome and purposeful and provides a premium feel.
Overall, it may not be the best hybrid camera available, but if you can look past its poor ISO performance, you’ll find a willing photographic companion.
|
|
Added by ContaxRTS3 |
March 02
Incomplete comparison
It is become a sad joke... What about Fuji ? There are out for a long time, and the only ones not to be tested. What's wrong ? Where is your credibility with such a miss ?
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
March 04
Re: Incomplete comparison
Hi,
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. If you are referring to the Fuji X cameras, you probably know that they do not use a Bayer matrix but a “X-Trans” matrix. We will try to test this sensor, but although we try to respond to your requests to provide tests for specific camera models, there are no plans for doing it in the short term. Best regards, The DxOMark Team Reply |
|
|
Added by ContaxRTS3 |
March 05
Re: Incomplete comparison
Hi,
Thanks for answering. I don't know the details of your protocol, but I don't understand why the X-trans matrix prevents you to test it in usual way. Still, this fact means than no APS-C format product from Fuji can be tested, which is sad. But, again, thanks for the reply. Reply |
|
|
Added by iamsam |
February 27
11 lenses including 3 pancakes
To set the record straight - there are 11 current NX lenses including 3 pancakes. One wonders when this article was actually written...
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Emilie_DxOMark |
March 05
Re: 11 lenses including 3 pancakes
Hello,
Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. The NX lenses are now planned so the first results should be available in few week. Best regards, The DxOMark team Reply |
|
|
Added by lastras |
February 27
Ouch
Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Toshik |
February 27
Re: OuchQuote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Samsung/NX-200">this page on the website</a></div>Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse Reply |
|
|
Added by iamsam |
February 27
Re: OuchQuote: <div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Samsung/NX-200">this page on the website</a></div>Awful sensor and cooked files to make it even worse The score seems to say otherwise ... compared to other mirrorless cameras announced in the same period of time (many months ago, by the way) only the NEX sensor was better. Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.