Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35mm f/1.4 ZF2: a premium Zeiss wide-angle lens put to the test
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 Lens Review
Announced at PhotoKina 2010, the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 lenses for Canon and Nikon are arriving on the market and have now been tested on DxOMark.
With these new lenses, the German brand extends its already extensive line of fast wide-angle lenses such as the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 28mm f/2 ZE Canon and the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 28mm f/2 ZF2 Nikon.
The technical specifications of the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 are really impressive for a 35 mm lens. Only Rokinon and Samyang can offer similar lenses. The build quality is outstanding and the focus ring is amazingly precise. Unfortunately, this lens doesn’t have auto focus, which may limit its potential market. The price itself will also restrict this lens to very few potential buyers: $1843.
In term of optical performance, we expected a lot from such a lens at such a premium price, and we were a bit disappointed.
On a full-frame (Canon EOS 5D Mark II and Nikon D3x), these lenses achieved a DxOMark score of 26 (Canon) and 27 (Nikon). We noticed very close results for both versions for every measurement.
What we like:
- Distorsion, transmission, and vignetting are well controlled even on a full-frame camera.
What we don’t like:
- The maximum resolution is good but not as good as its best competitors, such as the Nikon 24mm f/1.4 and the Samyang 35mm f/1.4.
On an APS-C, similar to the full-frame tests, all the measurements are quite satisfying, with of course lower distortion and vignetting.
Zeiss 35mm 1.4 versus Samyang 35mm F1.4 on a full-frame camera
In this comparison on a Nikon D3x (full-frame), the Samyang 35mm f/1.4 is better than the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35mm f/1.4 ZF2 in almost all respects, for a price 4 times lower. On a full-frame, the superiority of the Samyang is mainly due to its better homogeneity across the field.
Zeiss 35mm 1.4 versus Samyang 35mm F1.4 on an APS-C
In comparing these lenses on an APS-C, it’s interesting to note that with the smaller pixels of the APS-C sensor, the 2 lenses are much closer in term of performance. It will be interesting to see how these lenses behave on the new generation of 24-MPix APS-C sensors.
You can find all the Carl Zeiss lenses on DxOMark here, along with the previous reviews of Zeiss lenses here.
Comments
|
Added by photojoe658 |
April 14, 2012
Samyang 35mm/1.4 vs Zeiss 35/1.4 vs Zeiss 35/2
As tested on the Nikon D3X the Samyang has a much higher score than the other two according to DXO mainly due to higher resolution and uniformity over the whole image field. Yet, looking at the use case scores - the star ratings - the Zeiss 35mm/1.4 has a higher rating for landscape than the other two lenses. It doesn't make sense to me.
Reply |
|
|
Added by bozianul |
March 22, 2012
ZF.2 f1.4 vs f2: which one should I buy/use/trust?
The Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f2 (ZF.2) has 29 DxO marks and the f1.4 only 26-27?
using aspherical? this should improve lens characteristics... Reply |
Further readings for the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35mm f/1.4 ZF2: a premium Zeiss wide-angle lens put to the test
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
Carl Zeiss |