
We have just tested the Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO on both Canon and Nikon mounts, giving us the opportunity to review the performance of all the lenses in this category (though we’re waiting for the results of the latest Sigma 105mm f 2.8 EX DG OS, which should come our way soon!).
Before launching into our comparisons, let’s take a little closer look at how the two versions of the Tamron lens perform:
With a DxOMark overall score of 23 for the Canon mount and 22 for the Nikon, the two 90mm Macros are for all intents and purposes identical.
And the winners are ...
Of note for those with a limited budget, Sigma and Tamron offer very satisfactory alternatives in terms of image quality... and which are nearly 2 times less expensive than the L series.
Also note that the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM is a bit dated: there is a 10-year gap between the first and fourth versions.
Note: The difference between the Zeiss and the other cameras is very small, and in fact all the lenses have excellent sharpness.
Note: The difference of 1.25 EV can be important under low-light conditions.
Note: Vignetting equal to or greater than -1.5EV is significant and noticeable.
Note: A LCA score of 3µm means that the aberrations are so insignificant that no post-production editing is required. But at 11µm, LCA is starting to get serious, which means a significant increase in post-processing time.
And the winners are ….
The rankings here are a bit less close, with both Nikon and Carl Zeiss providing an exceptional lens for Nikon mounts.
| Strong points | Weak points |
| Excellent resolution | Noticeable chromatic aberrations |
| Zero distorsion | Transmission not as good as the Zeiss |
| Price | |
| Weight |
| Strong points | Weak points |
| Excellent resolution | Transmission not as good as the Zeiss |
| Correction of distortion | Heavier than the Tamron |
| Correction of chromatic aberrations | More expensive than the Tamron |
| Strong points | Weak points |
| Excellent resolution | Significant, visible vignetting |
| Zero distorsion | Price |
| Very bright | Weight |
| Excellent correction of chromatic aberrations |
All this said, if you want to own the best macro lens for your Nikon, you will want the Nikkor AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED (DxOMark score of 34).
|
|
Added by Nacho_Tyr |
January 26, 2012
tamron 90mm f2.8 DI macro
please, test the version for Pentax
Reply |
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
|
We have just tested both the Canon and Nikon versions of the Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM lens, announced on February 8, 2011. |