|
Toolbox
|
More lenses
|
Mount type |
Brand |
Talks and comments
|
Added by fishnose |
May 21
D4 lens tests
|
|
|
Added by derway |
May 20
Please test EXR modes on all fuji cameras that support it
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II will be tested when
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED bad Chr aberration results
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: A37
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: Sony A57
|
|
|
Added by Bobo_SAN |
May 18
Re: A37
|
Tests and reviews for the lens Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
Measurements and specifications
| Announced | 1995-03-01 |
| Indicative price (USD) | 1300 |
| Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Focal range (mm) | 70 - 200 |
| Filter diameter (mm) | 77 |
| Max diameter (mm) | 84.6 |
| Mount type | Canon EF |
| Stabilization | No |
| AF Motor | USM |
| Zoom type | Ring |
| Rotating front element | No |
| Tripod mount | Yes |
| Color | White |
| Full-Time manual focus | Yes |
| Number of lenses | 18 |
| Number of groups | 15 |
| Diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Circular aperture | No |
| Length (mm) | 193.6 |
| Weight (gr) | 1310 |
Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
in lp/mm
in EV
in EV
in micrometer
Further readings for the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
 |
Today we are publishing the test results of the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM II (mounted on Canon and Nikon bodies), as well as comparing its performance relative to equivalent lenses on the market. |
 |
A couple of days ago, we released the measurements for the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. With its wide aperture, its image stabilizer and its fast auto-focus, this telephoto zoom lens is definitely one of the favorite equipments of sport photographers. It is also ready to face difficult weather conditions with its solid and watertight build. Let’s see how it behaves in term of image quality compared to its predecessor. |
Comments
| Copyright © 2008-2012 DxO Labs. All rights reserved. | Contact us | DxOMark Conditions of Use |
|