|
Toolbox
|
|
|
Added by derway |
May 20
Please test EXR modes on all fuji cameras that support it
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II will be tested when
|
|
|
Added by eireann |
May 19
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED bad Chr aberration results
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: A37
|
|
|
Added by koleh77 |
May 18
Re: Sony A57
|
|
|
Added by Bobo_SAN |
May 18
Re: A37
|
|
|
Added by Bobo_SAN |
May 18
Re: Sony A57
|

With 7 different high-end compact camera models launched in 2011, Fujifilm holds the manufacturing record for this segment for 2011. Further, 2012 seems to be starting out just like 2011, with the announcement of the F770 EXR, XS -1, and HS 30 EXR cameras.
With this review of the Fujifilm F550 EXR and F600EXR, DxOMark completes its 2011 Fujifilm “collection.”
At first glance, the two cameras look nearly identical, and in fact the F600EXR was launched only 3 months after the F550 - with the same body, same design, and same sensor specifications.
These two cameras are compacts with a large focal range zoom lens (15x with a 24-360 mm f) and a tiny (half-inch!) sensor with a very high pixel density (a pixel pitch of only 2µm). This sensor is a BSI CMOS sensor, purportedly more sensitive than classic FSI CMOS and destined to become standard for every sensor with a pixel pitch inferior to 1.4 µm.
It is worth noting that at this price there are not a lot of brands that allow shooting in RAW.
The EXR technology is a specific pixel array rotated by 45° compared to a conventional CFA array:
Different modes are available. When the EXR mode is activated, half of the pixels will be underexposed to allow better reproduction of the scene’s dynamic. In this case, a specific demosaising process obtains a fully-resolved 16-Mpix image with a wider dynamic.
Another mode allows the user to shoot with all pixels exposed at the same level; in this case, the sensor provides a “real” 16-Mpix image.
No suspense here, the sensors are identical from the DxOMark point of view.
The scores are very close to the current best compact cameras. The low-light ISO scores (158 for the F550, 153 for the F600) are very close to that of the Canon Powershot S100, for example.
Their DxOMark scores (39 for the F550 and 40 for the F600) are limited by the ISO range (scores for studio conditions, color depth and dynamic range could be better if Fujifilm provided an ISO 50 or ISO 80).
To complete this review, here are 2 interesting comparisons: the Fujifilm F600 vs the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Nikon Coolpix P7100:
and the Fujifilm F550 vs the Samsung EX1 vs the Olympus XZ1:
|
|
Added by ranma |
January 16
EXR Mode tested
I wonder whether dxo test the F600/550 with exr mode on/off.
Is there any differece between EXR mode on and off? Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
January 17
Re: EXR Mode tested
I have no idea why DXOMark is not giving the details of their test.
At least it should state its all done on standard mode (on full resolution). What focal length on the lens was set for the test etc. I would also like to see the rating under all the three fields, colors, ISO and DR when image output is set to Medium RAW and EXR is set to DR priority. This is a different kind of sensor and should be treated differently. Opinion on the Score: Even in that standard mode it is quite a decent score, considering the flexible focal range 15x and starting at 24mm. Reply |