Toolbox

Advanced

Keep me posted Forum Twitter Facebook
Keep me posted
RSS

 

Talks and comments


Added by fishnose |  May 21
D4 lens tests
Added by derway |  May 20
Please test EXR modes on all fuji cameras that support it
Added by eireann |  May 19
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II will be tested when
Added by eireann |  May 19
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED bad Chr aberration results
Added by koleh77 |  May 18
Re: A37
Added by koleh77 |  May 18
Re: Sony A57
Added by Bobo_SAN |  May 18
Re: A37

Contrary to conventional wisdom, higher resolution actually compensates for noise

Introduction | Modeling small pixels | Comparing the SNR of cameras with different resolutions | Real-life comparisons | Conclusion

Noise measurements in RAW format are indicative of pixel performance, but the viewing conditions of the image must also be taken into account. To compare prints on a given format of cameras with different resolutions, it is more suitable to compute the equivalent SNR of a camera with a given reference resolution. For equal, normalized SNR, a high-resolution camera is still better than a low-resolution camera. While it is always possible to simulate a low-resolution camera using a higher resolution camera (since downsampling is easy), it is not possible to simulate a high-resolution camera using a lower-resolution camera other than by interpolating or inventing data.