Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 : Tests and Reviews
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 side by side comparisons
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 versus predecessor
| 67 |
| 71 |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 versus Canon model
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 versus Sony model
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 versus Olympus model
| 67 |
| 73 |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 versus rival model with similar score
| 67 |
| 66 |
Try our side-by-side camera comparison tool
Further readings for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
 |
The Nikon 1 J5 is the latest iteration of the 1-series mirrorless J-range models aimed at what the maker calls “everyday” users. Read on to find out how well the sensor in this new model performs. |
 |
Panasonic’s latest iteration of the LX series premium compact eschews the usual 1/1.7-inch sensor for the larger Micro-Four-Thirds type found the firm’s mirrorless models. It also has a Leica 24-75mm f1.7-2.8 zoom, a traditional rangefinder style top plate with EVF, a hot shoe, and manual mechanical controls. Read on to see how well this intriguing new model performs. |
 To website |
Some of the most beloved premium compact cameras in the last decade are Panasonic's LX-series. They always offered larger-than-average sensors but, from the LX3 onwards, the big draw of those cameras has been their fast lenses. The last LX model was the Lumix DMC-LX7, introduced back in fall of 2012. Since then, LX-series enthusiasts have been chomping at the bit for something new. Read the article |
Comments
|
Added by dgeugene |
January 23 , 2015
sensor ratings
Does anyone have an idea as to how DXO sensor scores could be compared WITHOUT the low light ratings? I am impressed by how similar many cameras of different sensor sizes are at lowest ISO. Obviously a larger sensor means less noise at high ISO's but I am less interested in that.
Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
December 17 , 2014
67 score for both sony rx-iii and lx100
It has better ISO result, better DR and just 0.1 less color depth.
Come on Dxo .. considering these values it should have couple of points more? Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
December 17 , 2014
Lower ISO was expected
As its the same sensor as GX7 or GM1/5 sensor characterstics were supposed to be similar. The odd of lower ISO was expected as its taking the 12MP out of 16MP sensor thus losing quarter of sensor size. When you downsize it to 8MP as Dxo like to do you will get it lower number compare to GX7 where the whole sensor is used.
Reply |
|
|
Added by mike-san |
December 09 , 2014
Lens?
If the lens in not interchangeable then a review that doesn't include information on the lens is just self-serving blather.
"Oooh, look at us. We can rate the sensor. Too bad for you that the lens is garbage (or not) so you have no idea if the camera as a whole is worth buying...Ha ha, made you look! Buy our software. We are experts, you know." Consider this a formal protest to your *expletive* policy or whatever it is, Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
First replies for this comment
|
|
Added by Nam Aciel |
December 11 , 2014
Re: Lens?
Some consideration of the lens on a fixed lens compact is necessary but isn't this normally the realm of sites like DPreview that use DxO's data?
The base ISO SNR is more interesting than the point at which it drops below 30dB for a fixed lens camera. For two compacts where one has a low light ISO of 600 and one of 400, if the lower performing camera has a one stop faster lens then it will make a better low-light camera (600 vs 400x2). Reply |
|
|
Added by Hakeem |
December 17 , 2014
Re: Lens?
Don't worry buddy .. as Pany/Leica traditions are, you wont get wrong with this lens.
P.s. Dxo will probably rate the lens, bit later .. they normally don't do it with camera bodies Reply |