Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM
Further readings for the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM
To provide photographers with a broader perspective about mobiles, lenses and cameras, here are links to articles, reviews, and analyses of photographic equipment produced by DxOMark, renown websites, magazines or blogs.
 |
Announced alongside the EF 16-35mm F2.8L III USM and the Canon EOS 5D Mk IV, this lens is the long-awaited update to the much-liked original EF 24-105mm F4 IS USM. Read on to find out how well this new model performs. |
 |
Following its intriguing 24-70mm f2.8 stabilized model, Tamron has added a high-speed ultra-wide 15-30mm f/2.8 version, also with stabilization. Read on to find out how well the Canon-mount model performs. |
 |
Canon has launched the 3rd iteration of its popular EF 16-35mm f/2.8L wide-angle zoom lens, predominantly for full frame press, sport and action photographers. Significant improvements to outer field sharpness on the new $2199 EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III also make it a viable option for landscape or astrophotography on the 50Mp EOS 5DS R, as well as wedding or event photography on the EOS 5D Mark IV. Although headline specifications are basically the same as its predecessor, improvements to the new lens’s durability, including water and dust resistance, equip the new lens better for the hammer of pro shooting in fast-paced, all-weather environments. Despite being specifically intended for use on full frame Canon DSLRs, the new EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III also remains compatible with Canon APS-C sensor cameras, such as the 7D Mark II, where it offers a less wide-angle and less useful 26-52mm equivalent focal range. |
Comments
|
Added by Zeevkirshenboim |
January 11
Score
The score is 24 and not 34.
I am anazed that nobody at DXO noticed and corrected. Reply |
|
|
Added by ph4vn |
January 10
score 24 or 34?
Main page says score as 34 but inside I see 24. On which came body its score is 34? I checked all canon bodies and find that on 5DSR its score is 24 and all other bodies its cores less than 24.
Reply |
|
|
Added by ahsanford |
December 20 , 2016
Identical vignetting for 16-35 f/2.8L III as II version?
Agree with myname. How are these vignetting curves the same?
You disagree with at least four reviewers reporting 4+ stops vignetting at 16mm f/2.8 for the f/2.8L III. Are you testing at infinity focus, where vignetting would be the worst? Your methods page does not state this, please clarify your method. Reply |
|
|
Added by myname |
December 20 , 2016
Vignetting
To be blunt, I don't believe these results.
Check your markIII vs mkII vignetting profiles. No lens is that identical to another. The MkIII is reported in most reviews as having ~4 stops of vignetting at 16mm & f2.8, yet you're saying it's about half that. Reply |