|
Mobile Scores
|
- 90
- 89
- 88
- 87
- 86
- 85
- 84
- 83
- 82
- 81
- 80
- 79
- 78777675747372706968676661595750
Pixel smartphone camera review: At the top
By David Cardinal - Tuesday October 04 2016 Mobile ReviewOverview
With an overall DxOMark Mobile score of 89, pixel, the latest Google smartphone, is the highest-rated smartphone camera we have ever tested. Its image quality scores are impressive across the board, but it is particularly strong in providing a very high level of detail from its 12.3MP camera, with relatively low levels of noise for every tested lighting condition. It also provides accurate exposures with very good contrast and white balance, as well as fast autofocus.
The Pixel’s strong scores under a wide range of conditions make it an excellent choice for almost any kind of photography. As with any small-sensor device, results are excellent in conditions with good and uniform lighting. But in addition, images captured indoors and in low light are very good and provide a level of detail unexpected from a smartphone camera. With flash, its auto white balance and detail preservation are excellent, making it suitable for indoor portraits — and even for photographing indoor events as long as there is some additional ambient light to help even out the flash.
The Pixel has very few weaknesses when it comes to image quality, but It does suffer from some inconsistency in repeated autofocus, and artifacts can appear in low-light shots. The Pixel racked up excellent results in our Video testing, consistent with other top-scoring smartphones.
The Pixel’s 12.3MP main camera is paired with a fast f/2.0 lens. Autofocus is provided by a combination of laser detection (LDAF) and phase detection (PDAF). The Pixel can also record 4K video at 30fps, and 1080p video at up to 120fps.
Outdoor photos
The Pixel produced some of the most natural-looking outdoor images we have ever seen in our tests. With rich colors, life-like white balance, and excellent rendering of both highlights and shadow details, images of landscapes and urban scenes alike are pleasing to the eye. Detail preservation is excellent, and exposures are consistently good.
Low-light and indoor scenes
The Pixel is one of the best devices (maybe the best) we’ve ever tested for its ability to render poorly-lit scenes with low noise, while retaining good detail – even in 10 Lux and below. Its hybrid autofocus, using both laser- and phase-detect pixels, is also accurate in low-light conditions.
Flash photos
The Pixel’s flash capability is also one of the best we have tested. It is stable from frame to frame and allows for excellent rendering of details in flash images.
Video
The Pixel produced overall excellent video results, with one of the best stabilization systems we’ve tested. Motion artifacts are visible only in low light, due to the longer shutter speeds needed.
Pixel’s power enhances Google’s HDR+ feature
Pixel’s biggest innovation is an enhanced version of Google’s HDR+ multi-image capability. First introduced in some of its Nexus phones (see our Nexus 6P review), the upgraded version in the Pixel combines several RAW images in near-real time to create one enhanced JPEG image with lower noise and extended dynamic range as the final result.
The Pixel activates the Google Camera app’s Auto HDR+ feature as its default camera mode. The Pixel determines whether it needs to use multiple images to get lower noise and better dynamic range, then switches HDR+ on as needed. It also does a good job of detecting rapid motion in the scene, avoiding the ugly artifacts often found in images from other HDR systems.
Google certainly isn’t unique in providing clever software for assembling multiple images, as Apple, Motorola, and Sony have all done something similar – but the Pixel pushes the capability further than we’ve seen before.
HDR+ was introduced with the Nexus 6P last year, and has been included in Nexus models since then, but the Pixel’s increased computing power extends the feature’s functionality and performance.
To assess the Pixel’s HDR+ capabilities, we did a comparison of the Pixel and the Nexus 6P using a very simple test:
We took a shot every second for more than 10 seconds and compared the level of image quality provided for each shot. If image quality went down significantly, it meant that the smartphone didn’t have enough processing power to provide an HDR+ picture and instead provided a traditional single-frame image. The Nexus 6P was unable to keep up, but the Pixel could capture as many as 9 HDR+ frames before falling back to a single-frame image.
If we slowed down to one image every 3 seconds, the Pixel was able to provide HDR+ pictures indefinitely, while the Nexus 6P failed to use HDR+ after 4 images, meaning that the Pixel has more consistent image quality when shooting multiple images.
Details: Explaining the score
Exposure and Contrast (90)
The Pixel is an all-around great performer here, in conditions ranging from bright outdoor scenes to our darkest lab conditions.
Overall, the Pixel did extremely well in capturing our natural test images, typically performing as well or better than other current flagship models. However, on our greenery test scene below, it didn’t perform as well as some of the other flagship phones, as it lost details in the shadows.
Even in low-light conditions (tested down to 5 lux) the Pixel’s camera provided accurate exposures and evenly-lit images with little light falloff near the edges.
Color (85)
Good color starts with accurate white balance – otherwise the entire scene will have a color cast. The Pixel excels here, with remarkably good automatic white balance in almost all conditions.
While white balance was excellent overall, the Pixel created a slight yellow, but acceptable, color cast in one outdoor scene. We’ve added HTC 10 and Samsung Galaxy S7 shots for reference.
Image colors in outdoor scenes are vivid and pleasant. Sometimes there was a small amount of color shading, but it was barely visible. In low light the color shading is visible, with a slight tendency towards pink in the center and green in the corners.
Autofocus (93)
Overall, the Pixel’s autofocus is both very fast and very accurate. Its only failing is that it was inconsistent in our repeated autofocus tests, with some frames relatively far out of focus.
Details (93) and Noise (84)
The Pixel does better in outdoor scenes at preserving detail than any smartphone we’ve ever tested. Thanks to its HDR+ technology, detail preservation is also remarkably good in low light.
The Pixel does produce slight luminance noise in outdoor scenes, along with chromatic noise in lower light conditions. Overall, though, the image noise is some of the lowest we’ve tested.
Artifacts (84)
One big drawback of rendering all image details is that doing so often adds a lot of annoying artifacts to the photo. With the Pixel, Google has clearly opted for maximum detail preservation, but also succeeds in limiting artifacts. For example, moiré patterns can be quite visible in heavily-patterned subjects such as the one in our outdoor image below. Similarly, ringing is sometimes visible on high-contrast edges.
Flaring was sometimes an issue when shooting in full sun, as was some aliasing of narrow elements such as the metal grid in this sample image:
Flash (88)
The Pixel’s high-quality (CRI of 90) dual LED flash provides generally even illumination that is nicely centered in front of the camera lens. When lighting portraits, some light falloff around the edges is quite visible, but this is typical of even high-end smartphones. While balance was accurate not only when using just flash, but also in mixed-light scenes with an added Tungsten light source — an impressive achievement.
Video (88)
Strong video scores in: Autofocus, low noise, stabilization, and overall image quality
With very impressive stabilization, accurate autofocus, and generally good quality, the Pixel produces excellent video under most conditions. Its Video score of 88 is tied with the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Sony Xperia X for the highest ever achieved.
Weaknesses in video
We found some relatively minor issues when recording video with the Pixel. There is slight motion blur in low light while walking, as the show shutter speed overwhelms the stabilization. There can also be some jello effects from the rolling shutter, which is very common for smartphones. Finally, there is some chromatic noise and color shading under low light, but not enough to seriously affect the Pixel’s score.
Summary: The best smartphone camera we’ve tested to date
Simply put, the Pixel raises the bar for what is possible with a smartphone camera. Image quality continues to improve, and the increased use of HDR+ to render scenes that have previously been difficult for small sensors such as those in smartphones broadens what is possible with these ubiquitous devices. While we have reviewed other smartphone cameras that matched the Pixel’s numbers in a few categories, the Pixel is uniquely capable of capturing outstanding images under a wide variety of conditions, and is also among the best we have tested for video capture.
Photo
| DxOMark Mobile Photo | ||
| Exposure and contrast | |
| Color | |
| Autofocus | |
| Texture | |
| Noise | |
| Artifacts | |
| Flash |
Pros
- Very good target exposure and dynamic range in all conditions
- Very good detail preservation in all tested lighting conditions
- Good white balance, in all conditions
- Colors are vivid and pleasant
- Fast and generally accurate autofocus
- With flash: accurate white balance, good exposure, very good details and pleasant colors
Cons
- Slight autofocus irregularities
- Slight color shading visible in low light conditions
- Flash: slight exposure and white balance irregularities are noticeable
Video
| DxOMark Mobile Video | ||
| Exposure and contrast | |
| Color | |
| Autofocus | |
| Texture | |
| Noise | |
| Artifacts | |
| Stabilization |
Pros
- Good stabilization in all conditions
- Very fast and accurate autofocus
- Good noise reduction
- Good exposure
- White balance is generally good and stable
- Good colors rendering
Cons
- Slight motion blur is visible on walking scenes in low light conditions
- Slight judder and jello effect are sometimes noticeable
- Slight chromatic noise and color shading are noticeable in low light conditions
Comments
|
|
Added by dansan92 |
April 25
XZ Premium or Galaxy S8
I think XZ Premium can beat Google Pixel on the top score, maybe Galaxy S8 can be reach on the top score? the Huawei P10 with Leica camera can't reach on the top, why? whats wrong with Leica Camera?
can't wait for both XZ Premium and Galaxy S8 compare with Google Pixel Reply |
|
|
Added by mrtank |
March 31
Pixel and Outdated/Incomplete Testing Methods
<div id="linkdxomark">This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Pixel-smartphone-camera-review-At-the-top">this page on the website</a></div>
If you are only taking photos outdoors in decent light, then this is the phone for you. I love Google. I don't just love them, I really love them. That's why what I am about to say is so saddening. I can't help it. I am so dissatisfied by this device that it's pushed me to write this so that others wouldn't make the same mistake I did. To put it nicely, the camera on this phone sucks. Inside my house (which has regular lighting), I was unable to use the Zoom function and take a single crisp photo. Close-up, in the middle, far away, a little Zoom, a medium Zoom, etc. All of the photos were horrible. With the HDR Off, HDR Auto or HDR On. No difference. Flash On, Flash Off or Auto Flash. Same thing. I then thought I could deal with this phone if I could at least get some crisp up-close shots indoors..... I was wrong. Again, the Zoom function would not work. Not even using the smallest amount of Zoom. HDR functions worked best when Off and with the Auto Flash or Flash On. But still, it was average/low-average at best. Did I mention I could not use the Zoom functions? I then decided to try and take some regular photos of my walls (with photos on them) from about 6 feet. With regular lighting, it was decent, but my $250 Nexus 5x still outperformed the quality. With a spotlight on the wall, it took great photos. Using HDR in any mode really helped with taking photos hanging on my wall at 6 feet with a spotlight. The Autofocus and Manual Focusing of objects more than 6 feet away, sucked. The Autofocus and Manual Focusing of objects close-up, sucked. Macro. I don't want to talk about it. All I'll say about the Pixel's Macro is that it was the biggest disappointment of all. $1000 for a phone without a usable camera. The best camera I've ever had in a smartphone is still the Samsung Note 3's camera. The Nexus 5x's camera is better than this one. If Landscapes in Perfect Weather, VR, Animated GIFs and taking Burst Shots are your thing, then you are perfect for this phone. For anyone else, don't waste your time. I truly hate this phone. I trust that the dxomark Review was done with the best intentions. But I would suggest adding some other tests because I based a little of my buying decision off of this review. I read many others. Some counted even more towards my decision. But just the fact that I didn't spend 3 more months reviewing this device before buying it has made me question everything about reviews no matter where they're from. So what I'm trying to say is: add some more tests to your overall process. Please. Note: this is my 3rd Pixel (the other 2 I thought had bad camera's...) and I've spent over 10 hours with Google Customer Support troubleshooting this device. I am also an Android developer and have been developing for Android devices for 7 years. Reply |
|
|
Added by Leocabello |
March 14
Nice but...
... what about One Plus 3T? Most people say it's one of the best in the market but I don't see it here.
Reply |
|
|
Added by andruhata |
February 10
An interesting finding.
After a brief research I found a few interesting facts.
Firstly: This HDR+ feature Google are applying in their recent phones is like an inferior version of certain aspects of the Nokia's PureView technology, reintroduced by another name years later (just like what Samsung did recently with their Always-On display, an inferior version of the Nokia's Glance screen). I am having every single aspect of the HDR+ (including the touch-focus and one-finger-zoom) on my Nokia Lumia from 2014 - two years and a half old. The only thing that the Lumia phones lack here is the laser autofocus which only advantage is faster autofocus in low/no light. Secondly: DxO have never tested and reviewed any Nokia/Microsoft Lumia model since 2013 - the time of Nokia Lumia 1020 and 1520 (the latter having been tested in category "camera" and not "mobile" and - indeed - scored poorly). Thirdly: DxO have also never tested and reviewed a single Huawei model. Ever. An underdog brand, indeed, but highly praised for their cameras and interestingly innovative technology, including a secondary black-and-white camera which takes the best black-and-white shots as well as helping for the low/no light shots with impressive results. Conclusion: I have no idea what criteria DxO's tests and reviews are based on (I never saw a single night or pitch black shot in their tests and comparisons, nor did I a panorama or zoom-in shot). I also have no idea what criteria their choice of camera to test is based on, but the above mentioned facts - as other facts, mentioned by other people in the comments (like the flash and texture comparison between Pixel, Lumia 1020, and Nokia 808 and the respective scores, as well as the Pixel's test before its release, so that Google can include the results in their advertisement) are pretty odd and disturbing and I, personally, cannot count on any objectivity by DxO. Never trust anything mainstream. Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
First replies for this comment
|
|
Added by nixon |
March 03
Re: An interesting finding.Quote: After a brief research I found a few interesting facts. Thirdly: DxO have also never tested and reviewed a single Huawei model. Ever. An underdog brand, indeed, but highly praised for their cameras and interestingly innovative technology, including a secondary black-and-white camera which takes the best black-and-white shots as well as helping for the low/no light shots with impressive results. Never trust anything I say. They already did review a few Huawei models: [url=https://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Mate-9-camera-review-A-big-step-up-for-Huawei]Mate 9[/url] , [url=https://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Huawei-P9-vs.-P8-Mobile-review-Good-improvement-for-the-latest-device]P9 vs P8[/url] Reply |
|
|
Added by andruhata |
March 05
Re: An interesting finding.
First: You misquoted me.
Second: When I searched for Huawei camera reviews at the time of my post the search results were none. Reply |
|
|
Added by homnil |
March 05
Re: An interesting finding.
I hope that something good will come back to you.
Reply |
|
|
Added by Wiibloke |
January 18
It's all subjective
iPhone 7 plus at 2x zoom is still a 12.3 megapixel photo, the Pixel is not. That doesn't mean the iPhone is better it just means 'which is better' is all just a point of view and what you measure as better. These phone reviews these days are all pointless, they are often based on tech which is not yet available or so new no one has really tested it and they typically conclude the same "depends which you prefer".
Reply |
|
|
Added by Cyberpi |
January 13
Texture and Flash results
The most odd rating system I've ever met.
PIXEL has 1/2.3" sensor, Nokia 808 - 1/1.2″, Nokia 1020 - 1/1.5". Now ratings for Texture: Pixel: 93 808: 84 1020: 88 Is that a kind of a joke??? Flash: Pixel has usual dual led flash and this is a quote from "cons" list: "slight exposure and white balance irregularities are noticeable". 808 has xenon flash! Now let's see the ratings Flash: PIXEL: 88 808: 81 DXO, could you please explain it? Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
First replies for this comment
|
|
Added by andruhata |
February 05
Re: Texture and Flash results
Absolutely right!
Moreover, they still haven't had tested the Lumia 950, nor have they the 930 (which are 1 and nearly 3 years old respectively). A pretty interesting and quite a suspicious fact, I think: to exclude from the camera competition the brand regarded by most for making the best mobile cameras. I'm very curious how would the Pixel's dual LED dual tone flash stand, compared to the Lumia 950's triple natural RGB flash. Additionally, given the fact that the Pixel's HDR+ (as described and explained above) is not much different in function than the Lumia's Rich Capture mode (minus the option for after-the-fact HDR and flash adjustments), combined with the Pixel's lack of OIS, Dynamic Flash (part of Rich Capture), and Zeiss optics - it would be highly unlikely for the Pixel's 12.3 MP camera to match (in terms of details resolved, noise lowered, white balance, and exposure) the 20 MP cameras of the above mentioned Lumia phones, particularly the 950's one. Same goes for video recording. Reply |
|
|
Added by reza |
January 09
xiaomi Mi 5s with sensor IMX378 sony
pleas check xiaomi Mi 5s -with sensor IMX378 -
equal google pixel Please do the test for the xiaomi Mi 5s because it have the Sony IMX378 Exmor sensor compare to the Sony IMX378 in Google Pixel Reply |
|
|
Added by 3dry93 |
November 20 , 2016
OPPO R9S Plus vs Google Pixel
Please do the test for the OPPO R9S because it have the Sony IMX398 Exmor sensor compare to the Sony IMX378 in Google Pixel, so called the dual core auto focus, OIS+, 6 element lens, 5 elements lens for selfie. Aperture of f/1.7.
Reply | Read all replies for this comment |
First replies for this comment
|
|
Added by gtx1080 |
November 27 , 2016
Re: OPPO R9S Plus vs Google Pixel
No need to worry .PDAF means spliting some pixels, half for image and half for autofocus, and Samsung's dual pixel,splits every pixel for the same purpose. oppo's dual core simply splits some pixels and use both parts for autofocus, it's nothing like dual pixel. imx398 is simply a slightly upgraded imx298, and since oppo uses most of its money on advertising,its cameras are poorly programmed, which is why r9s plus is very likely to be beaten by oneplus 3,not to mention googel pixel.
Reply |
|
|
Added by Musby1940 |
May 10
Re: OPPO R9S Plus vs Google Pixel
You can get more information about feature and price of R9S plus from Oppo here: http://www.china-prices.com/phone/7181/oppo-r9s-plus
Reply |
|
|
Added by choirul.anam |
November 07 , 2016
compare with lumia 950
how many score lumia 950, and please compare with google pixel
Reply |
|
|
Added by AmirReza |
November 03 , 2016
Xperia XZ
I think DxOMark is waiting for sony to release Android 7 update for the XZ and then review it.
Xperia XZ will easily get to the top Reply | Read all replies for this comment |


















































































