Smartphones  >  Asus Zenfone 8  >  Audio Test Results
premium ?

Asus Zenfone 8 Audio test: Good at softer volumes

This device has been retested in the latest version of our protocol. Overall, sub-scores and attributes are up to date. For detailed information, check the What’s New article
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

Launched in May 2021, the Asus Zenfone 8 is one of the currently most compact flagship-level smartphones. But don’t let the small package fool you: the Asus comes with top-end hardware, including a 5.9-inch Super AMOLED display with 1080 x 2400-pixel resolution and 120 Hz refresh rate, as well as Qualcomm’s top-of-the-line 888 chipset.

In the audio department, Asus claims its Zenfone 8 is nothing short of a “treat for your ears” with higher volume, wider dynamic range, deeper bass and super tonal balance (but we won’t know higher, wider and deeper than what). On the recording side of things, videos benefit from a wind filter and an audio zoom algorithm (called Acoustic Focus Mode by Asus). And last but not least, despite its compact design, the latest Zenfone brings the 3.5 mm audio jack back from the dead!

Key audio specifications include:

  • Two speakers (bottom right and top center)
  • Audio zoom
  • Wind filter
  • Hi-Res Audio

About DXOMARK Audio tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone audio reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate both Playback and Recording using only the device’s built-in hardware and default apps.
(For more details about our Playback protocol,

click here; for more details about our Recording protocol, click here.)

Test summary

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Asus Zenfone 8
117
audio
115
Playback
121

158

121

149

123

162

120

162

79

157

121
Recording
107

147

123

146

118

159

104

170

93

145

109

166

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.

Playback

Pros

Cons

  • Loss of control in bass distortion as content reaches too low
  • Impaired bass precision
  • Lack of clarity and brightness.
  • Compression at high volume.

Recording

Pros

  • Good tonal balance overall in life videos
  • Good spatial performance in life videos

Cons

  • Muffled Tonal Balance is Selfie Video and and in Meeting use case
  • Strong compression that affects intelligibility of voices in In/Out scenario
  • Volume changes not so subtly in reaction to loud noises. For a constant loud noise in the background, loudness decreases progressively

With a global Audio score of 66, the Zenfone 8 secures a midpack position among all the phones we’ve tested to date. Playback is characterized by a warm and colorful timbre, a wide stereo scene rendition, and punchy dynamics which makes it suitable for playing games. The speakers are particularly skilled at softer volumes, which allow dynamic contents to remain perfectly intelligible. However, uncontrolled bass, a lack of brightness and too many artifacts take the phone out of the running if what you’re looking for is a device to listen to music with or watch movies on.

As a recording device, while the Zenfone 8 doesn’t excel in any use case, it nonetheless manages to keep its head — and its microphones — above the water in every use case. Its strengths are a balanced frequency response and good spatial attributes in life videos, along with appreciable loudness and dynamics across every use case. That all said, tonal balance is muffled in selfie videos and meeting recordings, spatial results are middling, and artifacts — both spectral and temporal — are poorly managed.

Sub-scores explained

The DXOMARK Audio overall score of 66 for the Asus Zenfone 8 is derived from its Playback and Recording scores and their respective sub-scores. In this section, we’ll take a closer look at these audio quality sub-scores and explain what they mean for the user.

Playback

Timbre

Asus Zenfone 8

68

89

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (89)

Timbre tests measure how well a phone reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency.

The Zenfone 8 delivers a pleasant timbre, warm, colorful, with very good midrange and satisfying bass restitution at nominal level.

Music playback frequency response

The timbre’s main limitations are at both ends of the spectrum. While a deeper extension and a more discreet distortion would have done low-end much good, treble is somewhat dull, and lacks brightness. This darker tonal balance is not too problematic at nominal level, however, it intensifies as volume increases. Upper midrange is also slightly lacking, which can occasionally make for a muddy or blurry rendering.

Dynamics

Asus Zenfone 8

66

81

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (81)

DXOMARK’s dynamics tests measure how well a device reproduces the energy level of a sound source, and how precisely it reproduces bass frequencies.

Dynamic attributes are particularly heterogeneous. Attack is mostly sharp, securing well-defined transients, but can in some cases be somewhat hindered by muddiness in the timbre, or compression at high volume. Punch is very good most of the time, substantiated by well-established power in the low-midrange register. Relatively unmoved by the dynamic compression, it remains strong regardless of the speakers’ volume.

Bass precision, on the other hand, is quite inconsistent. Internal audio processing renders the bass envelope inaccurate most of the time, with either a sustain that sounds unusually exaggerated by distortion, or predominant attack.

Spatial

Asus Zenfone 8

62

88

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (88)

The sub-attributes for perceptual spatial tests include localizability, balance, distance, and wideness.

The Zenfone 8’s speakers turn in an honorable performance overall in terms of spatial reproduction: the stereo field is fairly wide, localizability of the sources within the field is above average, and distance perception, albeit slightly impaired by the lack of upper midrange, is still decent.

Note that, as in many other devices, the stereo field doesn’t follow the device’s orientation in inverted landscape when using the music app. Finally, balance is marginally skewed to the right, but nothing too problematic.

Volume

Asus Zenfone 8

63

91

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (91)

Volume tests measure both the overall loudness a device is able to reproduce and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Minimum volume is very well tuned, allowing dynamic content (such as movies or classical music) to remain fully intelligible, and the distribution of volume steps from softest to loudest level is rather consistent. That said, the speakers’ maximum volume if a bit below average, besides being affected by compression.

Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

Hip-Hop Classical
Asus Zenfone 8 68.1 dBA 66.7 dBA
OnePlus 9 75.9 dBA 72.4 dBA
Google Pixel 5 75.2 dBA 72.4 dBA

Artifacts

Asus Zenfone 8

80

113

Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
Best: Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming (113)

Artifacts tests measure how much source audio is distorted when played back through a device’s speakers.

Distortion can occur both because of sound processing in the device and because of the quality of the speakers.

With an artifacts sub-score of 80 in playback, the Zenfone 8 is one of the least skilled devices we’ve tested to date when it comes to keeping undesirable sounds to a minimum.

While playback is mostly clean at nominal level, higher volumes trigger not only distortion, but also compression, and even pumping. Bass distortion remain fairly discreet on average but get significantly stronger when low-end content is prominent, resulting in severe resonance-like artifacts in the lower register.

Recording

Timbre

Asus Zenfone 8

67

91

Honor Magic3 Pro+
Best: Honor Magic3 Pro+ (91)

Life videos benefit from a fairly balanced frequency response with sufficient treble strength and clean midrange. Bass can be a bit too prominent though, which can make the overall result sound slightly boomy.

Life video frequency response

In selfie videos, memos and meeting configurations, in addition to the prominent bass, a lack of high-end extension generates a fairly muffled sound, whereas when recording in loud environments, both high- and low-end are recessed.

Dynamics

Asus Zenfone 8

68

81

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (81)

In terms of dynamics preservation in recorded audio, meeting recordings fare best, closely followed by selfie, then life videos.

While the signal-to-noise ratio is on target in life and selfie videos, it is at its best in memos. As for the sound envelope, it is particularly precise in videos, and in meetings. 

Spatial

Asus Zenfone 8

58

78

Black Shark 4S Pro
Best: Black Shark 4S Pro (78)

The Zenfone 8 turns in an average performance in this category. The phone’s timbre performance in recording is mirrored in the spatial domain: while localizability is precise in life videos, it is rendered blurry in selfie videos by the lack of brilliance. Wideness, which is good in the former use case, is also limited in the latter. Since the human ear uses higher frequencies to track movements and assess a space, it is only logical that these two attributes would be impacted by a lack of treble. Further, in meetings, voices seem distant.

Volume

Asus Zenfone 8

68

99

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (99)

The phone’s volume performance is fairly good, with an average maximum level reachable without perceivable distortion, but good loudness across all use cases. Here are our test results, measured in LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); as a reference, we expect loudness levels to be above -24 LUFS for recorded content:

Meeting Life Video Selfie Video Memo
Asus Zenfone 8 -20.4 LUFS -20.1 LUFS -18.1 LUFS -18.5 LUFS
OnePlus 9 -29.5 LUFS -20.6 LUFS -19.4 LUFS -19.4 LUFS
Google Pixel 5 -28.8 LUFS -20 LUFS -19 LUFS -22.8 LUFS

Artifacts

Asus Zenfone 8

56

97

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (97)

Asus’s latest compact phone does a below-average job of controlling sonic artifacts in recorded audio. In urban and home scenarios, shouting voices can trigger slight clipping. In selfie videos, unintended changes in volume occur. In loud environments, such as concerts, harsh clipping is noticeable on sibilants. In both indoor and outdoor real-life scenarios, our engineers observed a gradual volume decrease, which makes voices become less intelligible and more distorted. Finally, the noise-canceling algorithm can induce severe alterations in timbre. You can check for artifacts yourself in the following sample recording, made in a controlled environment:

Background

Asus Zenfone 8

39

60

Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (60)

Considering the microphones’ timbre, spatial and artifacts results, background recordings are not of the highest quality. In life and selfie videos, the excess of bass makes the background sound boomy, and unnatural. In real-life scenarios, heavy compression springs into action.

Conclusion

Asus’s “big on performance, compact in size” phone isn’t that big on audio performance: If you’re looking for a masterful audio phone in the same price range, other models, such as the Black Shark 4 Pro, would make a far better choice.  If its non-audio features are your priority, know that the Zenfone 8’s speakers deliver decent in-game audio and good playback at softer volumes, along with fairly good sound attributes in videos filmed with the rear cameras.

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.