Speakers > Bose SoundLink Revolve II > Speaker Test Results
essential ?

Bose SoundLink Revolve II Speaker test: Built for mobility

The Bose SoundLink Revolve II doesn’t look different than its predecessor, and indeed it seems the main differences are improvements meant to make this 360-degree wireless speaker more versatile and practical. The brand improved the dust- and waterproofing of the device, achieving an IP55 rating, and Bose says that “water-resistant design means you can use it more places without worrying about an accidental showering of water, like by the pool or by the kitchen sink.” Bose also added an optional charging dock, another extra element of practicality.

The brand promises 13-hour battery life and a fulfilling musical experience: “A highly efficient transducer. Dual-passive radiators. An omnidirectional acoustic deflector. All of which simply means you’ll get lifelike sound… and real-life goosebumps.”

We put the Bose SoundLink Revolve II through our rigorous DXOMARK Wireless Speaker test suite. In this review, we will break down how it fared at audio playback in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Key specifications include:

  • Bluetooth, 3.5 mm jack input, Micro-B USB port
  • 8.2 cm x 15.2 x 18.4 (width x height x depth)
  • 0.66 kg (1.45 pounds)
  • One full-range downward firing speaker, one omnidirectional acoustic deflector, and two passive radiators, left and right.

Test conditions:

  • Tested with Motorola G8 for music / Xiaomi Mi TV Box S for movies
  • Communication protocol used: Bluetooth for music / 3.5 mm jack input for movies
  • Firmware version: 3.0.4

About DXOMARK Wireless Speaker tests: For scoring and analysis in our wireless speaker reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate playback using only the device’s built-in hardware. (For more details about our Speaker protocol, click here.) The Bose SoundLink Revolve II falls into the Essential category of devices in the DXOMARK Speaker rankings.

Test summary

Bose SoundLink Revolve II










From a global performance standpoint, the Bose SoundLink Revolve II’s score of 107 puts it in fairly good company, alongside the Amazon Echo 4th Gen, which had a score of 109, and between two other top competitors in our Essential Speakers category: the Google Nest Audio (112) and the Apple HomePod Mini (98).

The 360-degree approach of the Bose SoundLink Revolve II is designed to be optimal in the middle of a room or group.

The Bose SoundLink Revolve II performed well overall, with consistent timbre and dynamics performance no matter the orientation of the device. Upper spectrum timbre is good, with decent extension at nominal volume. Localizability is also good, assisted by the performance of the high frequencies. The balance is great — centered content is well rendered, and directivity is also great because the speaker fires in 360 degrees. In most use cases, voice distance rendering is good. The Revolve II has no artifacts at nominal and soft volumes. Another plus: when you use the jack to connect to video content, the audio-video latency is acceptable.

In the bathroom and bedroom use cases, the Bose SoundLink Revolve II’s 360-firing impinges on distance rendering.

The drawbacks of the SoundLink Revolve II include midrange rendering that is slightly inconsistent, with a small lack of upper mids. At soft volume, tonal balance lacks some high-frequency content. At loud volume, on the other hand, tonal balance becomes very midrange-focused. In the bedtime and bathroom use cases, the 360-degree approach hinders distance rendering, with voices perceived as diffuse or as coming from the back of the device. Because of the setup, the device has no wideness (though Bose notes that it can be synched with a second device). Attack is not precise on high-pitched instruments, while the lack of a lower spectrum impairs both bass precision and punch.

Maximum volume is not loud enough, and the volume steps aren’t consistent overall. At loud volume, strong compression induces noticeable pumping. And the Bluetooth connectivity comes with an audio-video latency that makes it less than ideal for watching video content.

Sub-scores explained

The DXOMARK Speaker overall score of 107 for the Bose SoundLink Revolve II is derived from a range of sub-scores. In this section, we will take a closer look at these audio quality sub-scores and explain what they mean for the user, and we will show some comparison data from two of the SoundLink’s principal competitors, the LG  XBoom Go PL 7 and the Sony SRS-XB43.

Playback attribute comparisons


Bose SoundLink Revolve II



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (152)

DXOMARK timbre tests measure how well a speaker reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency.

Playback timbre comparison

The SoundLink Revolve II performed fairly well in the timbre attribute, with good trebles and high-end extension. The midrange is slightly inconsistent, however, with a slight lack of upper mids, along with low-mid resonances, especially when listening to podcast content. A lack of low-end extension slightly impairs tonal balance. On the plus side, the 360-degree firing design allows a consistent tonal balance whatever the orientation of the device. In quiet environments, our engineers observed a slight lack of upper spectrum content and clarity.

Music playback frequency response

While watching movies, bass can become muddy, and low-mids are too prominent, masking the rest of the mix. And at loud volume, tonal balance becomes very midrange-focused, with metallic trebles. Bass and low-end extension is sorely missed at those higher volumes, which led to a lower score in the party use case.


Bose SoundLink Revolve II



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (137)

Our dynamics tests measure how well a device reproduces the energy level of a sound source, taking into account attack, bass precision, and punch.

Playback dynamics comparison

When it comes to dynamics, the SoundLink Revolve II was below average. The attack was not very precise on high-pitched contents, and a strong lack of low-end impaired bass precision and punch in most use cases. But because the speaker is omnidirectional, at least attack and precision are consistent, whatever its orientation. In addition to the lack of low-end at loud volume, bass precision and punch are strongly affected by heavy compression. In the video-watching use case, overall dynamics performance was brought down by muddy bass.


Bose SoundLink Revolve II



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (111)

Our spatial tests measure a speaker’s ability to reproduce stereo sound in all directions, taking into account localizability, balance, wideness, distance, and directivity. Please note that wideness is 0 on mono speakers and on speakers that cannot deliver a significant stereo effect.

Playback spatial comparison

Spatial is a bright spot for the Bose SoundLink Revolve II, with a good overall performance. Correct trebles and high-end extension — key for allowing the human ear to locate sounds — allows for decent localizability. Balance is great, respecting the position of centered elements. Good distance performance allows for a realistic placement of voices, except in the case of podcast content, where midrange resonances slightly impair voice-distance perception. Directivity is superb because of the 360-degree design of the device.

Playback directivity

Voices seem to be coming from behind the device in the bedtime use case because of its omni-directionality, which also created a sense that voices were diffuse and resonating in the bathroom use case. It is worth noting that there is no wideness, also because of the device’s design.


Bose SoundLink Revolve II



Bluesound Pulse Mini 2i
Best: Bluesound Pulse Mini 2i (141)

Our volume tests measure both the maximum loudness a speaker is able to produce and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Playback volume comparison
Playback volume consistency comparison

Volume was a low point for the Bose device. The maximum volume step is not loud enough when compared with similar-sized devices. And as shown in the graph above, volume steps are irregular. At low volumes, the increase in volume at each step is excessive. The last three volume steps at the high range don’t produce any change in loudness.

The Bose SoundLink Revolve II was not loud compared with similar-sized devices.

Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) we measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

Correlated Pink Noise Uncorrelated Pink Noise Hip-Hop Classical Latin Asian Pop
Bose SoundLink Revolve II 73.4 dBA 73.6 dBA 72.5 dBA 72.6 dBA 73.9 dBA 68.7 dBA
LG XBoom Go PL 7 85.6 dBA 83.5 dBA 81.9 dBA 76 dBA 82.5 dBA 75.4 dBA
Sony SRS-XB43 88.9 dBA 86 dBA 86.2 dBA 78.5 dBA 87.1 dBA 79.7 dBA


Bose SoundLink Revolve II



Sonos Five
Best: Sonos Five (133)

Our artifacts tests measure how much source audio is distorted when played back, along with such other sound artifacts as noise, pumping effects, and clipping. Distortion and other artifacts can occur both because of sound processing and because of the quality of the speakers.

Playback artifacts comparison

The SoundLink Revolve II produced few artifacts overall, earning a solid score in this attribute. At soft to nominal volumes, in fact, it produces no artifacts at all. At louder volumes, however, strong compression induces noticeable pumping. While watching television, audio is quite delayed when the video uses Bluetooth, but latency is acceptable when using the jack to connect to the sound source.

Playback total harmonic distortion
Because of Bluetooth-induced latency, using the 3.5 mm jack input for watching movies is a better choice.


Some of the Bose SoundLink Revolve II’s strengths lie in it design: it’s a small, highly portable, 360-degree-firing speaker that produces decent results in several attributes, especially at low and nominal volumes. Its timbre is pretty good in the upper spectrum, and it produces good localizability, great balance, and few artifacts at low volumes. When connected with its built-in jack to an audio source, latency isn’t a problem for watching video content. But this isn’t a party speaker. Its maximum volume isn’t as loud as other similarly-sized speakers. And at loud volumes, the tonal balance becomes very midrange-focused, with metallic trebles and a strong lack of bass. Bass precision and punch are really affected by the lack of lower spectrum, and those two attributes are also affected by compression that occurs at high volumes.


  • Good upper-spectrum timbre at lower volumes
  • Good localizability and distance performances
  • No artifacts at low and nominal volumes
  • Audio-video latency not a problem when using the jack


  • Inconsistent midrange, with a lack of upper-mids
  • Not loud enough at maximum volume
  • No wideness, as it’s not a stereo device.
  • Bass precision and punch are impaired at higher volumes.

DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.