We put the Google Pixel 7 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In this results summary, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 4355 mAh
- 30W charger (not included)
- 6.3-inch, 1080 x 2400, 90 Hz OLED display
- Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Google Pixel 7
98
battery
90
Honor X7a
Best: Honor X7a (213)
105
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)
94
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)
102
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (184)
105
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (182)
121
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
92
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
Key performances
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
2h43 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
Position in Global Ranking

115
th
6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
142
13. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
22. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
134
22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
25. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
25. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
25. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
36. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
37. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
37. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
52. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
58. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
60. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
70. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
80. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
86. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
86. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
90. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
109
92. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
96. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
100. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
105. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
105. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
110. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
110. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
110. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
115. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
115. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
119. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
121. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
121. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
121. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
126. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
126. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
129. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
130. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
134. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
135. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
139. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Position in High-End Ranking

22
nd
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
17. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
20. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
24. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
26. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
Pros
- Charger has low residual consumption whether device is plugged in and fully charged or is unplugged
- Decent autonomy when gaming
Cons
- Low autonomy when calling during calibrated and on-the-go tests
- High consumption when streaming music
- Low gain in autonomy with a 5-minute charge
- Very long wireless charging time (3 hours 46 minutes)
Despite a slightly smaller battery capacity and similar behavior, the Google Pixel 7 achieved a higher global score than the Pixel 6, thanks to improved efficiency. However, its overall autonomy is below average when compared with other devices in the High-end ($400-599) segment.
When testing each individual usage separately, the device still showed high consumption whether at home or on the go, but it put in a decent performance when gaming. Even though the device can use a 30W charger (not included), the Pixel 7’s wired charging was poor, as was its wireless charging. Moreover, a five-minute charge provided less than 3 hours of additional autonomy, which is low compared to other phones.
Test Summary
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
|
Battery |
Charger |
Wireless |
Display |
Processor |
Google Pixel 7 |
4355mAh |
30W (not included) |
23W |
OLED 1080 x 2400 |
Google Tensor G2 |
Google Pixel 6 |
4614mAh |
30W (not included) |
21W |
OLED 1080 x 2400 |
Google Tensor |
Xiaomi 12T |
5000mAh |
120W (not included) |
- |
AMOLED 1220 x 2712 |
Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Ultra |
How Autonomy score is composed
Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
68h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
49h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
31h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

99
th
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
17. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
21. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
67h
22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
27. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
29. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
30. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
34. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
38. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
42. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
61h
43. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
61. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
63. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
86. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
51h
87. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
93. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
95. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
100. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
101. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
104. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
106. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
107. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
108. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
110. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
112. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
117. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
120. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
122. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
123. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
125. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
127. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
128. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
130. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
131. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
134. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
136. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
138. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Position in High-End Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

21
st
12. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
20. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
26. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
105
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
94
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
Charging
103
Realme GT Neo 3
Realme GT Neo 3
How Charging score is composed
Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.
102
Black Shark 5 Pro
Black Shark 5 Pro
Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.
Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

105
th
20. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
26. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
27. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
46. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
50. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h37
51. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
52. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
0h37
53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
56. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
57. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
58. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
70. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
73. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
74. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
78. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
80. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
80. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
0h50
82. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
83. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
83. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
88. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
90. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
92. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
94. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
96. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
97. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
98. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
99. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
100. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
101. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
102. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
107. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
110. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
116. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
120. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
123. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
125. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
128. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
129. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
130. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
136. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Position in High-End Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

22
nd
6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
18. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
19. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
20. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
25. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
105
Realme GT Neo 3
Realme GT Neo 3
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.
Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)
Efficiency
101
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
Annual Consumption Google Pixel 7
4.4 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient
121
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.
Overall charge efficiency
92
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Average discharge current
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.