Speakers  >  JBL L75ms Music System  >  Speaker Test Results
premium

JBL L75ms Music System Speaker test

We put the JBL L75ms Music System through our rigorous DXOMARK Audio test suite to measure its performance at playing back audio. In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications include:

  • Wireless protocols: AirPlay, Wi-fi, Bluetooth
  • Wired connectivity: Jack
  • Dimensions: H: 216mm x  W: 790mm x D: 287mm (8.5 in x 31.1 x 11.3 in)
  • Weight: 15.9 kg (35 lbs .)
  • Speakers: 5 Driver design: dual 5.25-inch woofers, dual 1-inch Aluminum tweeters and a central 4-inch midrange driver Selectable sound-field expander and bass contour controlsHDMI ARC, moving magnet phono, and 3.5mm auxiliary inputs


Test conditions:

  • Tested with Apple  iPhone smartphone, iOS
  • Communication protocol used: AirPlay

JBL L75ms Music System
137
speaker
127

152

123

137

111

Best

94

141

103

133

Pros

  • Excellent immersion with top-of-the-class wideness and localizability
  • Excellent bass precision overall, with nice low-end extension
  • Very loud speaker, and great performance at maximum volume
  • Almost no distortion

Cons

  • Extremely muffled tonal balance
  • Inconsistent punch & distance rendition
  • Volume consistency needs fine-tuning
  • Compression and pumping can become an issue at loud volume

The JBL L75ms speaker offered an excellent sound immersion experience, with best-in-class wideness and localizability that will be especially appreciated when watching movies and listening to music in a relaxing scenario. Bass precision was also excellent, with a nice low-end extension, but the lack of treble got in the way, as tonal balance sounded generally muffled.

The speaker was one of the loudest we have ever tested. Its performance at maximum volume was great, with nearly no distortion, making it very suitable for cranking up the music in a party situation, if you don’t mind some occasional compression and pumping artifacts.

Besides its great maximum volume performance, the speaker’s volume consistency could use a little fine-tuning, as it was sometimes difficult to adjust the volume precisely.

Overall, the JBL performed best in our Relaxing and Party use cases, but it even managed to sound good in the Bathroom use case, proving capable of overcoming unforgiving acoustics to some extent.

We compared the JBL L75ms, which falls into our Premium speaker category ($600+), with the Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin and the Sonos Five.

Listen to the tested speaker’s playback performance in this comparison with its competitors:

JBL L75ms
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin
Sonos Five

Test summary

About DXOMARK Wireless Speaker tests: For scoring and analysis in our wireless speaker reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate playback using only the device’s built-in hardware. (For more details about our Speaker protocol, click here.) The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

The DXOMARK Speaker overall score is derived from a range of sub-scores. In this section, we will take a closer look at timbre, dynamics, spatial, volume, and artifacts, and explain what they mean for the user.

Timbre

127

JBL L75ms Music System

152

Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge

DXOMARK timbre tests measure how well a speaker reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency.

Playback timbre comparison

The L75ms delivered a strikingly dark tonal balance in its default settings, which negatively affected the listening experience. Treble seems to be almost completely missing in all use cases, giving the speaker a muffled sonority. Midrange would sound fine by itself, but it is lacking clarity because of no treble support. As for bass, it is powerful and has a very appreciable extension in the low end. However, because of the sheer lack of high-end and treble, the slightest boominess is immediately amplified, which is the case in a lot of scenarios such as TV or Relaxing at home. The L75ms delivered a good performance at maximum volume however, although it still lacked treble.

Music playback frequency response

Dynamics

123

JBL L75ms Music System

137

Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge

Our dynamics tests measure how well a device reproduces the energy level of a sound source, taking into account attack, bass precision, and punch.

Playback dynamics comparison

The speaker showed a good dynamics performance overall, although it lacked consistency. Attack was generally a bit dull, and this could have been because of the lack of timbral information. As a result, transients were less audible, and sharpness was impaired. Punch was generally quite good regardless of volume, but it could be overshadowed by boominess depending on the use case and the track. Bass precision was very good overall, as bass envelope was well under control in most scenarios. This was not the case, however, at high SPL, where bass precision performance plummeted. Sustain of the low-end felt exaggerated, and attacks of bass notes were not distinct enough.

Spatial

111

JBL L75ms Music System

Best

Our spatial tests measure a speaker’s ability to reproduce stereo sound in all directions, taking into account localizability, balance, wideness, distance, and directivity. Please note that wideness is 0 on mono speakers and on speakers that cannot deliver a significant stereo effect.

Playback spatial comparison

Spatial performance was excellent. The L75ms outperformed all speakers previously evaluated in terms of wideness and localizability. Immersion was thus excellent and very precise. As for distance perception, performance was average. Voices were generally perceived at the correct distance, although lacking presence due to an underwhelming treble, but depending on voice type and content, results could vary greatly.

Playback directivity

Volume

94

JBL L75ms Music System

141

Bluesound Pulse Mini 2i

Our volume tests measure both the maximum loudness a speaker is able to produce and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Playback volume comparison
Playback volume consistency comparison

The L75ms was the second loudest speaker we have tested to date, missing the first spot by only a couple of decibels. However, volume step distribution was exceptionally inconsistent, with the first steps being notably too spaced out.

Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) we measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

Correlated Pink Noise Uncorrelated Pink Noise Hip-Hop Classical Latin Asian Pop
JBL L75ms Music System 91 dBA 94.1 dBA 93.3 dBA 91.5 dBA 91.3 dBA 91.5 dBA
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin 89.6 dBA 87.2 dBA 87.8 dBA 81.3 dBA 89.6 dBA 82 dBA
Sonos Five 91.7 dBA 88.9 dBA 90.1 dBA 81.6 dBA 91.4 dBA 84.6 dBA

Artifacts

103

JBL L75ms Music System

133

Sonos Five

Our artifacts tests measure how much source audio is distorted when played back, along with such other sound artifacts as noise, pumping effects, and clipping. Distortion and other artifacts can occur both because of sound processing and because of the quality of the speakers.

Playback artifacts comparison

The speaker’s artifacts performance was quite good, with very little distortion, both objectively and perceptually, even at maximum volume. Global compression and pumping were quite noticeable at high volume, however, especially in the presence of loud bass.

Playback total harmonic distortion

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.