Smartphones  >  Sony Xperia 10 V  >  Battery Test Results
Sony Xperia 10 V
High-End ?

Sony Xperia 10 V Battery test

OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

We put the Sony Xperia 10 V through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 21W charger (not included)
  • 6.1-inch, 1080 x 2520, 60 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Sony Xperia 10 V
Sony Xperia 10 V
140
battery
171
Autonomy
181

221

146

195

167

198

102
Charging
85

224

123

212

94

205

174

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days 3h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h22
80% Charging time
Charging Time
2h16
Full charging time
Quick Boost
4h02 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent autonomy of more than 3 days when use moderately
  • Excellent autonomy across all usages
  • Very good autonomy on-the-go
  • Very low discharge currents overall
  • Very low consumption of the charger itself

Cons

  • Long charging time
  • Poor charge efficiency

The Sony Xperia 10 V battery experience earned the device an excellent global score, placing it among the top devices we have tested so far.
The Sony Xperia 10 V showed excellent autonomy across all our tests, lasting more than 3 days when used moderately. On-the-go performance was also very good, especially when using the camera. When testing individual usages, the Sony Xperia 10 V’s autonomy was excellent for all use cases.

With a slightly more powerful charger than its predecessor, the Sony Xperia 10 V was able to fully recharge its battery in 2 hours and 16 minutes, which is slightly faster than its predecessor, but still longer than the average in our database. Moreover, a quick 5-minute boost provided 4 hours of autonomy on average, which is slightly our below average.

The charger efficiency was poor, but the residual consumption of the charger itself was low, whether the fully charged phone was still plugged in or not. The Sony Xperia 10 V’s discharge efficiency was well optimized, with very low discharge currents across all our use cases.

Compared with devices from the same price range ($400 – $599), the Sony Xperia 10 V’s global score places it among the best devices of the segment. Its autonomy and efficiency scores were excellent and among the best for this price range, but its low charging score held it back from reaching the top of this segment.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Sony Xperia 10 V 5000mAh 21W
(not included)
30W OLED Triluminos
1080 x 2520
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Sony Xperia 10 IV 5000mAh 21W
(not included)
18W OLED
1080 x 2520
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Google Pixel 7a 4385mAh 18W
(not included)
- OLED
1080 x 2400
Google Tensor G2
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000mAh 25W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Exynos 1380

Autonomy

171

Sony Xperia 10 V

195

Honor X7b
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
109h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
75h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
47h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

181

Sony Xperia 10 V

221

Honor X7b

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

146

Sony Xperia 10 V

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

167

Sony Xperia 10 V

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

102

Sony Xperia 10 V

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
32%
in 30 min
1h22
0 - 80%
2h16
Full charge

Full charge

85

Sony Xperia 10 V

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

123

Sony Xperia 10 V

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

142

Sony Xperia 10 V

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Sony Xperia 10 V
3.5 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

94

Sony Xperia 10 V

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

174

Sony Xperia 10 V

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.