Smartphones  >  Xiaomi 13T Pro  >  Audio Test Results
Xiaomi 13T Pro
premium ?

Xiaomi 13T Pro Audio test

OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

We put the Xiaomi 13T Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Audio test suite to measure its performance both at recording sound using its built-in microphones, and at playing audio back through its speakers.
In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview


Key audio specifications include:

  • Two speakers (Top front, side firing)
  • No Jack audio output
  • Dolby Atmos technology

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 13T Pro
122
audio
119
Playback
118

158

129

149

124

162

95

162

113

157

130
Recording
102

147

116

146

133

159

141

170

113

145

134

166

Playback

Pros

Cons

Recording

Pros

  • Natural background rendition
  • Excellent recording loudness
  • Good spatial performance overall

Cons

  • Slightly muddy and unclear timbre
  • Slightly hissing treble can result in occasional harshness
  • Recording artifacts

In the DXOMARK Audio tests, the Xiaomi 13T Pro provided a fairly average performance and ranked behind its predecessor the 12T Pro. Overall, the 13T Pro did better in recording than in playback, which was mainly due to inconsistencies in the stereo rendition with the built-in speakers, which also sounded slightly harsh. But on the plus side, the audio was almost free of unwanted artifacts. Playback performance was best when listening to music and playing games but slightly less so when watching movies.

Audio recordings featured excellent loudness and were overall best in office environments. In terms of audio recordings in video, results were better with the selfie camera in portrait orientation than with the main camera in landscape.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Audio tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone audio reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions.
(For more details about our Playback protocol, click here; for more details about our Recording protocol, click here.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Playback

119

Xiaomi 13T Pro

163

Black Shark 5 Pro
How Audio Playback score is composed

DXOMARK engineers test playback through the smartphone speakers, whose performance is evaluated in our labs and in real-life conditions, using default apps and settings.

The 13T Pro’s playback had average timbre, with a tonal balance that had a noticeable emphasis on upper midrange and treble. Treble had some brightness that did not sound natural, but more sibilant and harsh. Midrange lacked warmth,  and while bass presence made up somewhat for the lack of low midrange, upper bass was quite blurry, and low-end extension was not deep enough. Dynamics performance was good, though, with decently sharp attack, correct bass precision and pretty good punch.

The results of the spatial tests were poor, with average wideness of the stereo scene and a weak left channel, as well as a hole in the middle of the stereo image. Consequently, individual sound sources could not be accurately pinpointed, and distance rendition was not particularly accurate either, with voices often sounding slightly distant. Volume step distribution could have been more consistent, and the minimum volume setting was too quiet, making it hard to listen to low volume passages in highly dynamic content, such as classical music. Maximum volume was loud enough. In normal use, audio artifacts were very well under control, with only some light distortion and subtle pumping at maximum volume. Our experts also noted that the bottom speaker could be easily occluded when gaming, but besides muting the right channel, this was not detrimental to the audio experience.

Listen to the tested smartphone’s playback performance in this comparison with some of its competitors:

Xiaomi 13T Pro
Apple iPhone 15
Google Pixel 8
Recordings of the smartphones playing some of our music tracks at 60 LAeq in an anechoic environment by 2 microphones in A-B configuration, at 30 cm
Here is how the Xiaomi 13T Pro performs in playback use cases compared to its competitors:
Playback use-cases scores

Timbre

118

Xiaomi 13T Pro

158

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Timbre score represents how well a phone reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency. It is the most important attribute for playback.

Music playback frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency emitted by the smartphone when playing a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.

Dynamics

129

Xiaomi 13T Pro

149

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Dynamics score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, for example how precisely a bass note is reproduced or the impact sound from drums.


Spatial

124

Xiaomi 13T Pro

162

Black Shark 5 Pro

The sub-attributes for spatial tests include pinpointing a specific sound's location, its positional balance, distance, and wideness.


Volume

95

Xiaomi 13T Pro

162

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Volume score represents the overall loudness of a smartphone and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:
Hip-Hop Classical
Xiaomi 13T Pro 68.1 dBA 60.2 dBA
Apple iPhone 15 74.6 dBA 72 dBA
Google Pixel 8 74.8 dBA 70.1 dBA
The following graph shows the gradual changes in volume going from minimum to maximum. We expect these changes to be consistent across the range, so that all volume steps correspond to users’ expectations:
Music volume consistency
This line graph shows the relative loudness of playback relative to the user selected volume step, measured at different volume steps with a correlated pink noise in an anechoic box recorded in axis at 0.20 meter.

Artifacts

113

Xiaomi 13T Pro

157

Asus ROG Phone 5

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which the sound is affected by various types of distortion. The higher the score, the less the disturbances in the sound are noticeable. Distortion can occur because of sound processing in the device and because of the quality of the speakers.

Playback Total Harmonic Distortion (Maximum Volume)
This graph shows the Total Harmonic Distortion and Noise over the hearable frequency range.
It represents the distortion and noise of the device playing our test signal (0 dB Fs, Sweep Sine in an anechoic box at 40 cm) at the device's maximum volume.

Recording

130

Xiaomi 13T Pro

160

Honor Magic6 Pro
How Audio Recording score is composed

DXOMARK engineers test recording by evaluating the recorded files on reference audio equipment. Those recordings are done in our labs and in real-life conditions, using default apps and settings.

The Xiaomi did comparatively better in recording than in playback. Recording timbre was good, with satisfying treble, good midrange and decent bass rendition. Dynamics performance was fairly good as well, despite slightly inconsistent envelope rendition across use cases. With the main camera in landscape orientation, the envelope accuracy was heavily impaired by compression and pumping, particularly when recording concerts. Attack sharpness was noticeably better with the selfie camera and the memo app. Signal-to-noise ratio was decent when recording in urban environments but even better in quiet surroundings, for example in a home or office.

Wideness of the recorded stereo scene was great with the memo app but less so with the main or selfie cameras. Despite some occasional blurriness, localizability was very good across all use cases. Distance rendition was quite realistic, and overall loudness was excellent despite some slight volume noticeable variations when stepping out from an indoors environment while recording. Results were also poor at high sound pressure levels, for example, concerts. In such conditions, our testers also observed heavy pumping and distortion. In addition, there was heavy hissing across all recording apps, except the memo app. The tonal balance of the background was natural, with good intelligibility of the main signal.

Here is how the Xiaomi 13T Pro performs in recording use cases compared to its competitors:

Recording use-cases scores

Timbre

102

Xiaomi 13T Pro

147

Honor Magic3 Pro+

The Timbre score represents how well a phone captures sounds across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, and tonal balance. It is the most important attribute for recording.

Life video frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency captured by the smartphone when recording a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.

Dynamics

116

Xiaomi 13T Pro

146

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Dynamics score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, for example how precisely a voice's plosives (the p's, t's and k's, for example) are reproduced. The score also considers the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), for example how loud the main voice is compared to the background noise.


Spatial

133

Xiaomi 13T Pro

159

Vivo X Fold

The sub-attributes for spatial tests include pinpointing a specific sound's location, its positional balance, distance, and wideness on the recorded audio files.

Recording directivity
Directivity graph of the smartphone when recording test signals using the camera app, with the main camera. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) over the angle of incidence of the sound source. (Normalized to the angle 0°, in front of the device.)

Volume

141

Xiaomi 13T Pro

170

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Volume score represents how loud audio is normalized on the recorded files and the how the device handles loud environments, such as electronic concerts, when recording.

Here are the sound levels recorded in the audio and video files, measured in LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); as a reference, we expect loudness levels to be above -24 LUFS for recorded content:
Meeting Life Video Selfie Video Memo
Xiaomi 13T Pro -21.4 LUFS -17.5 LUFS -16.7 LUFS -17 LUFS
Apple iPhone 15 -24.6 LUFS -22.4 LUFS -20.3 LUFS -19.2 LUFS
Google Pixel 8 -26.1 LUFS -20.8 LUFS -18.9 LUFS -19.9 LUFS

Artifacts

113

Xiaomi 13T Pro

145

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which the recorded sounds are affected by various types of distortions. The higher the score, the less the disturbances in the sound are noticeable. Distortions can occur because of sound processing in the device and the quality of the microphones, as well as user handling, such as how the phone is held.

In this audio comparison, you can listen to the way this smartphone handles wind noise relative to its competitors:

Recordings of a voice sample with light background noise, facing a turbulent wind of 5 m/s

Background

134

Xiaomi 13T Pro

166

Black Shark 5 Pro

Background evaluates how natural the various sounds around a voice blend into the video recording file. For example, when recording a speech at an event, the background should not interfere with the main voice, yet it should provide some context of the surroundings.

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.

Leave a Reply