Smartphones  >  Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G  >  Battery Test Results
Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Advanced ?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Battery test

OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

We put the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 67W charger (included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1080 x 2400, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
battery
137
Autonomy
149

221

118

195

126

198

138
Charging
127

224

149

212

142

205

125

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 14h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h33
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h57
Full charging time
Quick Boost
6h29 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Decent autonomy when gaming
  • Very good charging time at 57 minutes to a full charge
  • Good autonomy recovered after a 5-minute charging boost, with a gain of 6 hours and 29 minutes on average
  • Low battery consumption during idle phase, with only 1% drop per night on average
  • Great charge efficiency

Cons

  • High discharge currents when calling and using the camera on the go

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G’s global score was among the best of our database. It had a very similar performance to its predecessor the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, showing a slight improvement in the charging experience but a little decline in autonomy when testing individual use cases and on the go.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G’s charge lasted a good 2.5 days when the device was used moderately, with only 1% drop per night on average. When testing individual use cases, the autonomy was slightly above average with good performances when gaming but a poor experience when calling. The autonomy on the go was a bit balanced with decent results when using social apps, but low when using the camera or calling.

The 67W charger filled up the battery in only 57 minutes, faster than the average of our database. The device also recovered a very good 6 hours and 29 minutes of autonomy after a quick 5-minute charge.

Charge efficiency was very good thanks to the adapter’s excellent efficiency and a very low residual power drain whether the fully charged device was plugged in or not. For a large 5000 mAh battery, the device’s discharge currents were average in almost all use cases, except when using the camera or calling, where consumption was high. But discharge currents during idle phases were really good, meaning that the device is quite well but not perfectly optimized.

When compared with other devices from the Advanced price range ($200 – $399), the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G ranked in the upper part of our database thanks to an excellent charging experience and a decent efficiency. However its autonomy score was slightly below average for this segment.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000mAh 67W
(included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 5000mAh 67W
(included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 5000mAh 25W
(not included)
- OLED
1080 x 2340
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G 5100mAh 40W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Autonomy

137

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

195

Honor X7b
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
91h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
62h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
38h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

149

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

221

Honor X7b

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

118

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

126

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

138

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
75%
in 30 min
0h33
0 - 80%
0h57
Full charge

Full charge

127

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

149

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

130

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
3.8 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

142

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

125

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.