Smartphones  >  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G  >  Battery Test Results

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Battery test

111
battery

We put the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 120W charger (included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1220 x 2712, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
111
battery
97

221

103

195

97

198

153
Charging
139

224

169

212

148

205

64

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 1h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h26
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h34
Full charging time
Quick Boost
8h58 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Fast charging time
  • Good autonomy recovered after a quick boost charge

Cons

  • Higher-than-average discharge currents
  • Poor autonomy overall, especially when streaming music
  • High residual consumption of the charger when the device is fully charged

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G’s overall battery performance came in slightly below average in our database.

Equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery as its predecessor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G offered a moderate usage autonomy of 48 hours and 47 minutes, 6 hours less than the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G, ranking it below average in our database. Moreover, it faced challenges when testing individual usages outdoors and indoors, especially when streaming music and browsing social apps outdoors. Also, the battery gauge was inaccurate, displaying 20% and 100% when the true battery capacity was closer to 17% and 93%, respectively.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G comes with a 120W charger, which helped the device to reach a full charge in only 33 minutes. Additionally, a 5-minute quick charge provided 8 hours and 58 minutes of additional autonomy on average, positioning the device in the upper part of our database.

Finally, the charge efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G was good, but the residual power drained by the charger when the device was fully charged was a bit higher than average. However, the discharge currents in most of the use cases were higher than average, which dragged the efficiency score down.

Compared to the other devices in the High-end segment, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G’s ranked in the bottom part of our database because of the below-average performances in efficiency and autonomy. Its charging experience, however,  was good when compared with other devices from this segment.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G 5000mAh 120W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G 5000mAh 120W
(included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 5G
Honor 90 5000mAh 66W
(not included)
- OLED
1200 x 2664
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

Autonomy

98

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

195

Honor X7b
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
69h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
49h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
31h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

97

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

221

Honor X7b

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

103

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

97

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

153

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
94%
in 30 min
0h26
0 - 80%
0h34
Full charge

Full charge

139

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

169

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

85

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5.6 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

148

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

64

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.

Leave a Reply