Smartphones  >  Xiaomi Redmi Note 13  >  Battery Test Results
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
essential ?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Battery test

We put the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 33W charger (included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1080 x 2400, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
battery
121
Autonomy
120

221

123

195

121

198

115
Charging
112

224

119

212

119

205

108

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 8h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h44
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h12
Full charging time
Quick Boost
3h44 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Great autonomy, especially in video streaming and calling
  • Accurate battery gauge; 100% displayed on screen during charging measured 97.7% of real charged capacity
  • Very high adapter efficiency, with low residual power drain from the power grid

Cons

  • Weak autonomy in outdoor while browsing social apps
  • Limited autonomy regained from 5-minute charging boost
  • Relatively high discharging currents during gaming and idling with screen off

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 battery had an overall average performance, but this version showed a much stronger performance in autonomy and efficiency than its 5G counterpart, the Redmi Note 13 5G.

Under moderate usage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 lasted more than 56 hours, compared with the 50 1/2 hours of the 5G version. The device showed great autonomy in most outdoor use cases, except when browsing social apps. In most of the calibrated use cases, the Redmi Note 13’s autonomy was around average, while the autonomy of video streaming and calling was considerably above average.

The Redmi Note 13’s 33W charger, which comes with the device, was able to fully charge the phone in 1 hour and 12 minutes, placing it in the top half of our database. However, the charging boost performance was limited by the charger’s power; a 5-minute charge yielded only 3 hours and 44 minutes of additional autonomy.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 showed a slightly below-average performance in efficiency tests. The reason was linked to the relatively poor full-charge efficiency at 75.7%. However, the adapter of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 was relatively great, with an adapter efficiency at 92% and below-average residual power drain, whether the device was still connected or not. The discharging currents of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 were around average, except for streaming videos, which was much lower. But discharging currents of gaming and idling were relatively higher than average.

Compared to other devices in the Essential segment (<$199), the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ranked in the top half, thanks to its strong autonomy results.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5000mAh 33W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 6080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 5000mAh 33W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2400
Mediatek Dimensity 6080
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G 5000mAh 15W
(not included)
- LCD
1080 x 2408
MediaTek Dimensity 700

Autonomy

121

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

195

Honor X7b
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
81h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
56h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
35h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

120

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

221

Honor X7b

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

123

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

121

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

115

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
56%
in 30 min
0h44
0 - 80%
1h12
Full charge

Full charge

112

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

119

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

112

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

154

Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
4.5 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

119

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

108

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.

Leave a Reply