Mobile rating

Partnerships

Partner with DxOMark

DxOMark site content can be reproduced for professional use, limited as defined by the DxOMark Conditions of Use (“Fair Use”).

DxOMark is constantly looking for opportunities to partner with the media, including print publications, specialized websites, and blogs. If your website/publication is relevant to the world of digital photography, mobile devices, or imagery, and you would specifically like to publish DxOMark data, please contact us.

HTC 8X

Friday, December 21, 2012

Mobile Overview
DxOMark Mobile
66

Overview

Looking at the individual tests in more detail, the HTC performs reasonably well in most areas, though its noise performance for still images is below par, with images showing strong chroma noise and a loss of image detail in low-light conditions. There is also a tendency for images to produce a purple haze when using a direct light source (i.e., when a strong light comes into the camera from a wide angle, although these conditions are usually hard to reproduce). The one area for still images at which it does excel is color rendition, showing very good colors under most lighting conditions. The autofocus could also be better, working well in bright light, but more hit-and-miss in low-light situations.

In video, the HTC performs slightly better than in photo tests, scoring 67 compared to 66. Here the exposure and contrast are much better, though the colour rendition is not quite so good. The autofocus is also much improved, reacting quickly and quietly. The textures, noise performance and artefacts are also all better than when using the photo mode. The one area to be aware of with the video mode is that in low light, the frame rate can drop to unacceptably low levels causing some distortion.

Considering these video test results, the fact it only scores 1pt more in the overall video score seems strange. However, a look at the stabilisation score for video is clearly the culprit. Managing a score of only 11, it is ineffective in most situations. 

Coming in at sixth in the overall score is a respectable performance. The Nokia 808 Pureview is in a class of it’s own at the top, with four mobiles competing equally in tier two and the HTC 8X sitting in the third tier with the Nokia Lumia 920.

Photo

DxOMark Mobile Photo
66
Exposure and contrast
70
Color
81
Autofocus
56
Texture
74
Noise
49
Artifacts
70
Flash
60

Pros

  • Rich, pleasing colours in most lighting conditions
  • No colour shading
  • High levels of detail in outdoor images
  •  Autofocus produces sharp images in bright light conditions

Cons

  • White balance is excessively red under tungsten light sources
  • High dynamic range scenes are not recorded accurately
  • Strong low-frequency chroma noise in low light
  • Strong loss of detail in low light
  • Purple haze with direct light sources
  •  Autofocus inaccuracies in low light

Video

DxOMark Mobile Video
67
Exposure and contrast
88
Color
76
Autofocus
69
Texture
83
Noise
78
Artifacts
80
Stabilization
11

Pros

  • Autofocus is responsive and quiet
  • Textures are well produced even in low light conditions
  •  Low image noise level due to good noise reduction

Cons

  • Video image stabiliser is ineffective
  • Frame rate drops too far in low light causing frame distortion