We put the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) display through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.6inches AMOLED (90.0% screen-to-body ratio)
- Dimensions: 157.4 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm
- Resolution: 1080 x 2340 pixels, (~393 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
display
143
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
118
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
143
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
120
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking

87
th
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
155
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
155
9. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
13. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
13. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
13. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
20. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
22. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
27. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
27. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
150
27. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
36. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
42. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
45. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
47. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
51. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
54. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
54. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
59. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
59. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
65. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
70. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
71. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
82. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
82. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
87. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
90. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
90. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
90. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
90. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
95. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
100. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
100. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
104. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
104. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
104. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
104. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
115. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
119. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
123. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
140. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
144. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
144. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
148. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
154. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
156. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
159. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
160. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
164. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

59
th
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
155
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
155
7. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
10. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
15. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
17. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
21. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
21. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
150
21. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
27. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
34. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
41. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
44. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
44. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
50. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
57. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
59. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
61. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
61. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
61. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
68. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
68. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
72. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
80. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
93. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
95. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- High maximum brightness level under sunlight
- Adapted brightness and good tone curve on HDR10 videos
- Smooth interactions for web browsing or looking at pictures the gallery app
Cons
- Strong image alteration under sunlight
- Frame mismatches when gaming or watching videos
- Lack of smoothness on light transition
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) display’s performance proved to be just as good as the Ultra model, with both models attaining the same overall score.
It showed itself to be very versatile and well suited for most of the real-life situations used in the display tests. The movie-watching use case, in particular, stood out because of its well-managed brightness, contrast and dark tones.
Outdoors and in the sunlight, the brightness and readability performance of the S22+ (Exynos) was similar to the top-end S22 Ultra (Exynos).
When web browsing on the S22+ (Exynos), the display was also readable in indoor ambient lighting, and scrolling was smooth. But in our night reading use case, a low light condition, we found the brightness level to be a bit too high. In addition, the low flicker at 240 Hz could be a strain on some eyes.
Under sunlight, the display’s high brightness mode had a strange effect on some photos: While the screen was quite readable, all content details were lost and the photos’ color patterns appeared flat.
In ambient light conditions, viewing photos was affected by a yellow cast, but this did not affect skin tones. The slight yellow cast was also noticeable during movie watching.
The S22+’s versatility does not extend to gaming because the display sometimes suffers from aliasing and frame stutters.
Still, despite minor differences in readability, color, and video, the S22+ (Exynos) screen provided a well-rounded performance for a device that matched the series’ flagship ultra device – just in a slightly smaller package.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
Readability
143
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
164
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read the display under different real-life conditions on still content (photos & web). DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions
Indoor at 1000 lux, from left to right: Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) and Samsung S22 Ultra (Exynos)
(Photos for illustration only)
Color
118
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
165
Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8
How Display Color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point color temperature under indoor lighting conditions (1000 lux)
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the greater the color difference is visible. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will only be visible to trained eyes.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos), color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos), color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
White point on angle, Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
White point on angle, Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
Video
143
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
167
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
How Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the mastering color space of each video.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos), Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
(Photos for illustration only)
Motion
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
How Display Motion score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.
Video frame drops
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) at 30 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) at 60 fps
This long exposure photo presents the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).
Touch
120
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
164
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
How Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.
Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between the robot touching the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.
Artifacts
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
How Display Artifacts score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker as well as evaluates the residual aliasing when playing videogames, among others.
Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Measurements above that show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection
PWM Frequency Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
240 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users.
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.