Apart from a smaller screen, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL share the same specs, including the same Tensor G4 processor. We tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro display, and as expected, the results were the same as those for Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. Overall, these two products had a very similar performance despite a different screen-to-body ratio and some slight differences in color rendering. The Google Pixel 9 Pro display also earned DXOMARK’s Eye Comfort Label.
For more detailed information about the Google Pixel 9 Pro’s display performance, please see the test results of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.3 inches OLED LTPO
- Dimensions: 152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches)
- Resolution: 1280 x 2856 pixels, (~495 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
158
display
156
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
164
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
156
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
154
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Eye Comfort Label & Attributes
<20%
Flicker perception probability
% of population
1.48
Minimum Brightness
in nits
0.6
Circadian Action Factor
99%
Color
Consistency
vs Display-P3 color space
Position in Global Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
8. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
10. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
10. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
17. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
18. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
23. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
23. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
30. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
36. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
39. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
41. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
45. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
47. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
47. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
52. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
52. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
58. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
63. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
64. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
75. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
75. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
80. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
83. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
83. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
83. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
83. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
88. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
93. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
93. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
97. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
97. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
97. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
108. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
112. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
116. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
133. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
137. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
137. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
141. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
147. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
149. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
152. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
153. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
157. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
160. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
6. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
7. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
12. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
13. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
17. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
17. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
22. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
29. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
33. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
35. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
38. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
44. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
53. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
55. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
55. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
62. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
62. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
66. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
66. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
74. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
87. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
89. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- Faithful and well-rendered colors in most tested conditions
- Well-adapted for readability in most environments
- HDR10 video is pleasant to watch in low light and indoor conditions
- Accurate and fast touch
Cons
- Slightly low luminance for SDR video
- Loss of luminance and a visible color shift when viewed on an angle
- Holding device in landscape orientation could result in unwanted touches with the palm of the hand