Apart from a smaller screen, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL share the same specs, including the same Tensor G4 processor. We tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro display, and as expected, the results were the same as those for Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. Overall, these two products had a very similar performance despite a different screen-to-body ratio and some slight differences in color rendering. The Google Pixel 9 Pro display also earned DXOMARK’s Eye Comfort Label.
For more detailed information about the Google Pixel 9 Pro’s display performance, please see the test results of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.3 inches OLED LTPO
- Dimensions: 152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches)
- Resolution: 1280 x 2856 pixels, (~495 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
158
display
156
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
164
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
156
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
154
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Eye Comfort Label & Attributes
<20%
Flicker perception probability
% of population
1.48
Minimum Brightness
in nits
0.6
Circadian Action Factor
99%
Color
Consistency
vs Display-P3 color space
Position in Global Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
9. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
11. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
11. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
18. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
20. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
25. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
25. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
39. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
42. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
44. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
50. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
50. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
55. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
61. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
67. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
78. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
78. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
83. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
86. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
86. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
86. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
91. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
96. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
96. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
100. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
100. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
100. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
111. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
115. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
119. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
136. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
140. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
140. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
144. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
150. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
152. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
155. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
156. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
160. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
163. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
7. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
8. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
13. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
15. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
19. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
19. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
31. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
35. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
37. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
40. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
40. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
46. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
53. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
55. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
57. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
57. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
64. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
64. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
68. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
68. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
76. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
89. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
91. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- Faithful and well-rendered colors in most tested conditions
- Well-adapted for readability in most environments
- HDR10 video is pleasant to watch in low light and indoor conditions
- Accurate and fast touch
Cons
- Slightly low luminance for SDR video
- Loss of luminance and a visible color shift when viewed on an angle
- Holding device in landscape orientation could result in unwanted touches with the palm of the hand