The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Pro share the same rear camera specs, as well the same A16 Bionic processor, so as expected, the results of the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max camera are exactly the same as those of the iPhone14 Pro.
We’ve included a few examples from our testing to show the similarities between these two models. But for a more in-depth look at the iPhone 14 Pro Max’s rear camera photo and video performance, we direct you to the full test results of the iPhone 14 Pro.
Overview
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 48MP sensor, 24 mm equivalent f/1.78 -aperture lens, second generation sensor-shift OIS, Dual Pixel AF
- Ultra-wide: 12MP sensor, 13mm equivalent f/2.2-aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF
- Tele: 12MP sensor, 77 mm equivalent f/2.8-aperture lens, OIS
- HDR video recording with Dolby Vision
- A16 Bionic chipset
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
camera
111
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
119
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (128)
112
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
111
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
87
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
72
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
80
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
91
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
103
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
100
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
115
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
117
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (119)
117
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
113
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
117
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Best: Oppo Find X7 Ultra (119)
74
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
117
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (118)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Position in Global Ranking
20
th
7. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
18. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
20. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
20. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
27. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
27. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
31. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
37. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
44. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
44. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
59. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
59. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
72. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
72. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
77. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
81. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
81. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
89. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
95. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
95. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
102. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
108. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
111. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
111. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
121. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
121. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
125. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
127. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
127. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
127. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
132. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
132. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
137. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
140. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
141. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
142. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
144. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
146. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
153. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
153. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
157. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
159. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
159. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
162. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
162. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
162. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
165. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
167. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
169. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
170. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
172. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
175. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
177. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
179. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
180. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
183. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
183. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
185. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
186. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
188. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
192. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
194. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
201. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
203. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
18
th
7. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
16. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
18. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
18. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
22. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
24. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
28. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
42. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
48. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
57. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
62. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
62. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
65. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
67. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
75. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
77. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
83. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
84. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
84. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Pleasant and vivid color in photo and video, accurate skin tones
- Wide dynamic range in photo and video, excellent contrast
- High level of detail in photo and video
- Excellent autofocus for photo and video
- Pleasant simulated bokeh effect with very good details on faces
- High-quality continuous photo and video zoom at close and medium range
- Excellent video stabilization
Photo
143
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Zoom
139
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
Video
149
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.