Smartphones  >  Apple iPhone Air  >  Camera Test Results
Ultra-Premium ?

Apple iPhone Air Camera test

141
camera
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

We put the Apple iPhone Air through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 48MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 26mm equivalent f/1.6-aperture lens, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Apple iPhone Air
141
camera
134
Photo
166

184

165

175

14

169

106

169

155
Video
178

186

14

148

116

140

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 169

Portrait

Portrait photos of either one person or a group of people

BEST 185

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 180

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 147

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 159

Zoom

Photos and videos captured using zoom (more than 1x)

Pros

  • Accurate target exposure and wide dynamic range
  • Nice color in most conditions
  • Good balance between texture and noise, especially in bright conditions
  • Good detail and exposure in night shots
  • Very effective image stabilization in video mode results in smooth footage

Cons

  • No tele or ultra-wide camera modules
  • Some underexposure when capturing photos of high-contrast scenes
  • Narrow depth of field can result in out-of-focus background subjects
  • Lack of detail, inaccurate exposure in bokeh mode, slight segmentation errors in difficult scenes
  • Slightly slow focus in photo mode, occasional loss of focus in video mode
  • Exposure instabilities, slight color casts and white balance adaptation issues in video

The Apple iPhone Air did well in the DXOMARK Camera tests, but the lack of dedicated tele and ultra-wide camera modules means it cannot claim a spot among the best in our ranking. In camera terms the iPhone Air is essentially a simplified version of the iPhone 17 Pro, with only one camera module instead of the Pro’s three. Performance is very close to the 17 Pro’s primary camera module, producing bright pictures with very good image quality. However, the lack of tele and ultra-wide modules impacts the Air’s photography experience, especially when compared to some direct competitors, such as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, which include an ultra-wide module for added shooting flexibility.

That being said, the Air’s single camera module captures nice photos in most shooting conditions, with usually pleasant colors and warm white balance. Detail is good and noise levels are low, especially when shooting in daylight. Minor differences to the 17 Pro are noticeable in low light, where the Pro is slightly ahead in terms of detail retention and noise reduction. Like on the Pro, depth of field is slightly limited. As a result background subjects in group shots can be out of focus.

In video mode, the iPhone Air offers a wide range of resolutions and frame rates, up to 60fps at 4K and 240fps at 1080p Full HD. Our testing was performed at 4K/60fps where the device produced the overall best results, with the HDR format delivering a wide dynamic range and vivid colors. The texture/noise trade-off is good in most shooting conditions and the effective image stabilization ensures stable footage. However, our testers noticed occasional exposure instabilities and white balance adaptation issues, as well as some slight refocusing during recording.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s camera evaluations take place in laboratories and real-world situations using a wide variety of use-cases. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly using measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Apple iPhone Air Camera Scores
This graph compares DXOMARK photo and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

134

Apple iPhone Air

180

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 3,800 test images in controlled lab environments as well as outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, landscape and zoom photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 0.1 to 10,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our tests, image quality and camera performance of the iPhone Air were very close to the iPhone 17 Pro’s primary camera module, with similar strengths and weaknesses. Overall image quality is very good, with pleasant image output in most shooting conditions. Skin tones are rendered very well and nicely exposed, especially when images are viewed on an HDR display, but some occasional underexposure can be noticeable in difficult high-contrast scenes.

Images captured with the iPhone Air camera offer very good detail and a good trade-off between detail and noise, especially when shooting in bright light. In low light scenes noise can become more intrusive and detail levels lag slightly behind the flagship iPhone 17 Pro. The autofocus system does mostly a good job. Pictures are sharp and well focused in most situations, but the focus could be slightly faster to lock on. Depth of field is a little narrow as well, resulting in some out-of-focus background subjects in group shots.

When shooting in portrait mode, the camera produces nice pictures with a natural simulated bokeh effect. However, there can be a lack of detail on subjects and our testers also noticed some imprecise subject segmentation, especially in difficult scenes. The iPhone Air does not come with a dedicated tele zoom camera, so unsurprisingly detail in tele images could be better, especially at medium and long range tele settings. This is also where the difference to the iPhone 17 Pro is most noticeable. At close range tele, the camera produces decent detail which is pretty much on par with the flagship iPhone model.

Main

166

Apple iPhone Air

184

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Apple iPhone Air Photo scores
The photo Main tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses at 1x.
Exposure
125

Apple iPhone Air

134

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Color
129

Apple iPhone Air

133

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good pictures. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness level of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the global contrast and the ability to render the dynamic range of the scene (ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas). When the camera provides Photo HDR format, the images are analyzed with a visualization on an HDR reference monitor, under reference conditions specified in the ISO-22028-5 standard. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors according to results gathered in various studies and consumer insights while respecting the manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Apple iPhone Air – Accurate target exposure, warm white balance, pleasant color rendering
Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Accurate target exposure, warm white balance, pleasant color rendering
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Slight overexposure, neutral white balance, slight skin tone inaccuracies
Autofocus
116

Apple iPhone Air

135

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken in one light condition and indicated illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
Texture
124

Apple iPhone Air

132

Vivo X200 Ultra

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 0.1 to 10,000+ lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC), and the Dead Leaves chart. We also have an AI based metric for the level of details on our realistic mannequins Eugene and Diana.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Noise
121

Apple iPhone Air

129

Oppo Find X8 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 0.1 to 10000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
77

Apple iPhone Air

81

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

The artifacts evaluation looks at flare, lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Bokeh

165

Apple iPhone Air

175

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Apple iPhone Air - Bokeh mode
Apple iPhone Air - Slight loss of detail, nice subject segmentation
Apple iPhone 17 Pro - Bokeh mode
Apple iPhone 17 Pro - Slight loss of detail, nice subject segmentation
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge - Bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge - Loss of detail, nice subject segmentation

Tele

106

Apple iPhone Air

169

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

Apple iPhone Air Telephoto Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
Apple iPhone Air - Tele zoom
Apple iPhone Air - Loss of detail
Apple iPhone 17 Pro - Tele zoom
Apple iPhone 17 Pro - Slight loss of detail
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge - Tele zoom
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge - Loss of detail

Video

155

Apple iPhone Air

172

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate almost 3 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 0.1 to 10000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Not only the iPhone Air’s photo quality very close to the 17 Pro’s primary camera. The same is true for the video output. Video clips are bright, with a wide dynamic range, thanks to Apple’s HDR processing and format. Color rendering is generally accurate in most recording conditions, but our testers noticed some slight white balance casts and adaptation issues, as well as some exposure instabilities.

Video footage offers decent trade-off between texture and noise in bright light. Video noise is well under control and detail is good when recording in daylight or under typical indoor lighting. Video autofocus is fast and mostly accurate, but we did notice occasional loss of focus when tracking faces. Video stabilization is very effective, making for stable video, even when running during recording. In addition, motion is very smooth, thanks to a 60fps frame rate. The lack of tele and ultra-wide camera modules also has a negative impact on the video experience, especially when zooming. While at close range tele settings video detail is decent and on a similar level as on the iPhone 17 Pro, there is a noticeable reduction in detail at medium and long range tele.

Main

178

Apple iPhone Air

186

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone Air Video scores
Video Main tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.
Exposure
123

Apple iPhone Air

127

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Color
121

Apple iPhone Air

131

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness level of the main subject, the global contrast and the ability to render the dynamic range of the scene (ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas). When the camera provides Video HDR format, the videos are analyzed with visualization on an HDR reference monitor, under reference conditions specified in the metadata. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Apple iPhone Air – Accurate target exposure, warm white balance, nice colors

Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Accurate target exposure, warm white balance, nice colors

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Accurate target exposure, neutral white balance, slightly red skin tones on fair skin
Texture
113

Apple iPhone Air

118

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 0.1 to 10000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Noise
124

Apple iPhone Air

129

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 0.1 to 10000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.
Stabilization
122

Apple iPhone Air

124

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Apple iPhone Air – Very effective stabilization

Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Very effective stabilization

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Effective stabilization
Artifacts
86

Apple iPhone Air

89

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

Tele

116

Apple iPhone Air

140

Vivo X200 Ultra
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 12 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and smoothness of the zooming effect. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life video recordings.

Apple iPhone Air – Accurate target exposure, slight loss of detail

Apple iPhone 17 Pro – Accurate target exposure, slight loss of detail

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – Slightly underexposed subject, slight loss of detail

Leave a Reply