Laptops  >  Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)  >  Laptop Test Results
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

Apple MacBook Pro 14″ (2023) Laptop test

147
laptop

We put the Apple MacBook Pro 14″ (2023) through our rigorous DXOMARK Laptop test suite to measure its performance both at sound, camera and display.

In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications include (as given by the manufacturer):

  • Physical specs : 31.26×22.12×1.55 cm, 1.6 kg
  • Display : 14.2” Liquid Retina XDR, 3024×1964, 1000 nits XDR (1600nits peak), 500nits SDR, Pro motion 120Hz dynamic, True Tone.
  • Audio : 6 high-fidelity speakers with force canceling woofers, Dolby Atmos, 3-microphone array with beamforming
  • Webcam : FaceTime HD 1080p

Scoring

Use-case and feature subscores included in the calculations of the global score

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023) Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)
147
laptop
135
Camera
147
Display
148
Audio
Top score Best

Video Call

135

Best

127

142

144

Best

BEST 154

Music & Video

147

156

152

Best

Pros

  • In video call, camera provides a great level of detail in most conditions and a very good control of visual noise in well-exposed scenes
  • In video call, audio capture features a good tonal balance
  • Excellent playback of voices with warm, realistic and intelligible voices
  • Best-in-class HDR video rendering with wide gamut, accurate EOTF and very high peak brightness
  • Reflectance is well handled overall
  • Faithful and very pleasant tonal balance for music & video
  • Excellent dynamics with sharp, precise impacts and strong punch in music & video audio
  • Good audio spatial rendering with wide stereo and good distance rendition

Cons

  • Occasional unnatural color rendering in some challenging scenarios
  • In video calls, mono-only audio capture impairs intelligibility in stereo-capable voice call situations
  • Duplex handling issues; voices impaired by gating

The Apple MacBook Pro 14” established itself as the current reference for audiovisual performance, achieving the top scores for all tested use cases and features. It was simply excellent in all tested conditions.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Laptop tests: For scoring and analysis in our laptop reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluations under controlled lab conditions and real-life scenarios.
(For more details about the  Laptop protocol, click here.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023) overall & use-cases scores

Video Call

144

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

Best

About DXOMARK Laptop tests

DXOMARK's Video call use case is a score that evaluates how a device handles video calls and videoconferencing in multiple conditions. This score focuses on the camera performance and the capture and playback rendering of voices. Read more about how we test the use cases of Video call score here.

The MacBook Pro’s camera provided great detail in most tested conditions, as well as very good control of visual noise on well-exposed scenes. Exposure was accurate and stable in all situations.

Skins tones were accurate, but overall color rendering sometimes looked unnatural. Some artifacts such as ringing, quantization, and fringing were visible in most tested conditions. Audio capture of voices featured good, if slightly boomy, tonal balance. Envelopes were sharp and well preserved. Noise reduction is disabled by default, so noise levels were quite high. (The device relies more on videoconferencing apps to handle noise reduction.) Capture is mono only, which can impair intelligibility in stereo-capable voice call situations. Voice playback was excellent overall, with warm and realistic voices that were easily localizable and intelligible. Duplex situations induced some gating that may impair voice intelligibility in the most challenging situations.

Camera

135

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

Best

The following chart presents the camera subscores for the video call use case:

Camera scores comparison
Camera texture acutance on Deadleaves with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of texture acutance with the level of lux measured on a Deadleaves chart.

The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our camera labs:

Camera visual noise evolution with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.

Audio

144

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

Best

The following chart presents the capture subscores for the video call use case:

Audio capture scores comparison

The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in capture, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:

Audio capture frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency captured by the laptop when recording an objective test signal at 1 meter in an anechoic environment.
Audio capture Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise
This graph shows the Total Harmonic Distortion and Noise over the hearable frequency range. It represents the distortion and noise of the device capturing our test signal.
Audio capture directivity
Directivity graph of the laptop microphone(s) when capturing test signals using the camera app. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) over the angle of incidence of the sound source (normalized to the angle 0°, in front of the device).

Music & Video

149

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

154

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
About DXOMARK Laptop tests

DXOMARK's Video and Music use case score evaluates the capability of a device to reproduce multimedia usages such as videos, movies and music playback in indoor conditions. This score focuses on the display performance and audio-playback rendering. Read more about how we test this use case here.

The MacBook Pro’s top-flight HDR rendering had a wide gamut, accurate EOTF, and very high peak measured brightness compared to other laptops.  Its SDR rendering was not perfect though, with tones warm overall; and EOTF, while contrasted, looked unnatural. The display handled reflectance well. Audio rendering of multimedia content was excellent, with faithful and very pleasant tonal balance. Basses were deep (though sometimes slightly resonant), with more power than those of any other tested laptop. Dynamics were also excellent, with sharp and precise impacts and strong punch.

Display

147

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

156

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)

The following chart presents the display subscores for the multimedia use case:

Display scores comparison

The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our display lab:

Display gamut coverage for video contents
Laptop
Video gamut SDR
Laptop
Video gamut HDR
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
Display reflectance measurement (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Display reflectance profile
Display brightness uniformity
0.054
cd/m²
0.055
cd/m²
0.056
cd/m²
0.058
cd/m²
0.058
cd/m²
0.057
cd/m²
0.053
cd/m²
0.055
cd/m²
0.055
cd/m²
Laptop Distribution of brightness (min)
366.6
cd/m²
366.9
cd/m²
356.7
cd/m²
370.4
cd/m²
370.7
cd/m²
357.2
cd/m²
350.8
cd/m²
346.9
cd/m²
336.8
cd/m²
Laptop Distribution of brightness (max)
This illustration shows the brightness measured on nine zones of the display for minimum brightness (left) and maximum brightness (right) for SDR content.
Display SDR EOTF measurement
This graph represents the rendering of contrast (gray levels) for SDR video content, measured in the dark. We expect to be close to the 2.2 or 2.4 gamma references.
Display peak brightness for video contents

Display white point
Laptop
This graph represents the color temperature of white content, compared with the reference (Daylight illuminant D65) measured in the dark on video at minimum and maximum brightness.

Audio

152

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (2023)

Best

The following chart presents the playback for the multimedia use case:

Audio playback scores comparison

The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in multimedia playback, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:

Audio playback frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency emitted by the laptop when playing a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.
Audio playback Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.