Back to Speakers
Home > Speakers > Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level

Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level Speaker review: Good for listening to music while relaxing

Reading Time: 5 min read

Earlier this year, Bang & Olufsen unveiled its latest luxurious multi-room speaker, launched at a starting price of $1549 — although some of the Danish brand’s devices reach far loftier prices. The Beosound Level is a modular WiFi and Bluetooth portable speaker, IP54-certified and battery-operated, and despite its rather domestic appearance, it is also suitable for outdoor us.

The 3.3 kg portable speaker is equipped with five Class D-amplified speakers — two 0.8-inch tweeters, a 2-inch full-range speaker and a pair of 4-inch woofers — and offers WiFi connectivity with multi-room capabilities, Spotify Connect, Apple AirPlay2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, and an optical as well as a 3.5 mm jack input. With all that, the Beosound Level claims to deliver a “flawless listening experience in beautiful, portable form” that adapts to the speaker’s orientation: “dynamic bass” when laid flat, “unmatched clarity” when upright or “an enveloping soundstage” when placed on a wall. Additionally, the speaker features an active room compensation to also adapt to the space’s acoustics for a “clear, detailed listening experience at all times.”

We put the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level through our rigorous DXOMARK  Speaker test suite to measure its performance at playing audio back through its speakers. In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Key specifications include:

  • Speakers: two 2 cm (0.8″) tweeters, one 5 cm (2”) full-range speaker, and two 10 cm (4“) woofers
  • Weight 3.3 kg (7.3 lbs)
  • Connectivity: Bluetooth, WiFi, Chromecast, AirPlay2, optical and 3.5 mm jack
  • Google Assistant
  • IP54 (dust and splash resistant)
  • 16 hours of battery life
  • Stereo pair capable

Test conditions:

  • Tested with iPhone
  • Communication protocol used: AirPlay2

About DXOMARK Wireless Speaker tests: For scoring and analysis in our wireless speaker reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate playback using only the device’s built-in hardware. (For more details about our Speaker protocol, click here.) The Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level falls into the Premium category of devices in the DXOMARK Speaker rankings.

Test summary

Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level


  • Pleasant and colorful timbre at nominal volume
  • Good distance performance; localizability is correct despite strange stereo


  • Inconsistent tonal balance at high volume
  • Inconsistent dynamic processing and strange stereo rendering
  • Bass and lower treble resonances
  • Underwhelming volume and artifacts performances

Its overall score of 124 puts the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level at the bottom of our premium speaker rankings, right between two advanced speakers: the Sony SRS-XB43 and the Huawei Sound X.

The speaker is fairly suited for listening to music while relaxing at home thanks to a colorful and lively timbre restitution with enhanced bass, clear midrange, and rich lower treble. Bedtime music or podcasts are also possible because timbre at softer listening levels doesn’t differ too much from nominal volume, despite a more obvious lack of low midrange.

On the other hand, playback as a whole is too dependent on internal processing, and becomes unreliable at higher volumes: the frequency response becomes even more unbalanced with inconsistent bass, hollow midrange, and occasionally aggressive treble. Dynamics are rather underwhelming, and spatial attributes are strongly hamstrung by a cross-talk issue or a phase processing. Volume characteristics aren’t on target either due to inconsistently distributed volume steps before maximum volume; it isn’t as loud as its other premium competitors, and the speaker exhibits very noticeable temporal artifacts such as classic compression and pumping.

Sub-scores explained

The DXOMARK Speaker overall score of 124 for the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level is derived from a range of sub-scores. In this section, we will take a closer look at these audio quality sub-scores and explain what they mean for the user, and we will show some comparison data from two of the device’s competitors, the Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge and the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Balance.


Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (152)

DXOMARK timbre tests measure how well a speaker reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency.

Playback timbre comparison

The Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level turns a good timbre restitution overall: the tonal balance is characterized by enhanced bass, clear midrange, and rich lower treble. While the frequency response is certainly not flat, it is nevertheless pleasing, colorful and musical.

Music playback frequency response

That said, the bass sounds processed, which induces occasional resonances. This doesn’t get better as the listening level increases; at higher volumes, the speaker struggles to keep bass consistent and reliable. What’s more, it falls short when it comes to low-end extension.

Midrange frequencies are clear, natural, and pleasant but can sound somewhat hollow, due to a lack of low midrange. The midrange also proves to be quite inconsistent; at softer volumes, the lack of low midrange is exacerbated, and at louder volumes, its “hollowness” extends to higher frequencies thus becoming more obvious.

Finally, treble could be brighter if less emphasis was put on lower treble — which can often sound a bit resonant and tinny, and even slightly aggressive at loud volumes — and more emphasis was cast on the upper treble and high-end extension.

Bang & Olufsen Beosound Balance
Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level
Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge


Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (137)

Our dynamics tests measure how well a device reproduces the energy level of a sound source, taking into account attack, bass precision, and punch.

Playback dynamics comparison

While attack isn’t as sharp as expected, and punch is rather weak, bass precision is the most impaired attribute due to multiple resonances, especially at loud volumes, and an exaggerated bass sustain. As a whole, the sound envelope appears to be affected by the Beosound Level’s dynamic processing (compression).


Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level



Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge
Best: Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge (111)

Our spatial tests measure a speaker’s ability to reproduce stereo sound in all directions, taking into account localizability, balance, wideness, distance, and directivity. Please note that wideness is 0 on mono speakers and on speakers that cannot deliver a significant stereo effect.

Playback spatial comparison

The spatial sub-score is heavily impaired by what appears to be a crosstalk issue (audio leaking from one channel to the other), or an ill-adapted phase processing. This results in an unrealistic stereo scene, highly dependent on both the audio content, and the listener’s position.

Playback directivity

The speaker’s spatial performance is otherwise rather good. The localizability of the elements within the mix is fairly precise in spite of these shortcomings, and distance rendering is adequate.


Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level



Yandex Station
Best: Yandex Station (136)

Our volume tests measure both the maximum loudness a speaker is able to produce and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Playback volume comparison

The maximum level delivered by the Beosound Level is a bit subpar compared to other speakers sharing the same dimensions. Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) we measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

Correlated Pink Noise Uncorrelated Pink Noise Hip-Hop Classical Latin Asian Pop
Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level 84.8 dBA 83 dBA 79.6 dBA 81.4 dBA 79.4 dBA 75.7 dBA
Bang & Olufsen Beosound Balance 93.4 dBA 91.8 dBA 90.8 dBA 93.5 dBA 91.1 dBA 85.6 dBA
Bowers & Wilkins Formation Wedge 90.4 dBA 87.4 dBA 89.1 dBA 81 dBA 90.2 dBA 83 dBA

But what really hinders the speaker’s sub-score in this category is its very peculiar volume steps distribution, as seen in the graph below, where the maximum volume is reached well before the last volume step!

Playback volume consistency comparison


Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level



Sonos Five
Best: Sonos Five (133)

Our artifacts tests measure how much source audio is distorted when played back, along with such other sound artifacts as noise, pumping effects, and clipping. Distortion and other artifacts can occur both because of sound processing and because of the quality of the speakers.

Playback artifacts comparison

While compression remains fairly discreet at nominal volume, it becomes really obvious at louder volumes. Overwhelming compression and pumping appear, which utterly crush the dynamic range, and it even takes a toll on the speaker’s timbre.

Playback total harmonic distortion

Bass distortion, not systematically problematic when it is adequately handled, is less tolerated when it is inconsistent, which is the case with the Beosound Level. And in addition to overwhelming compression and pumping, some distortion is also noticeable at high volumes.


While the Bang & Olufsen Beosound Level certainly has numerous aesthetic and design arguments, its audio performance is not up to par compared to its premium competitors. The Beosound Level is relatively well suited for listening to music when relaxing at home (and probably in the garden, too, by means of its 16-hour battery and IP54 certification) thanks to a rich and colorful timbre restitution, but its performance in the other categories (dynamics, spatial, volume, and artifacts) and especially at louder volumes is strongly impaired by an ill-adapted compression algorithm and a strange stereo field rendition, leaving much to be desired.

DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.