Lenss  > Canon EF 17 40mm F4L USM  >  Lens Test Results

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens review: Popular high-performance option



Introduced in 2003 the EF 17-40 f/4L USM was one of the first of the lightweight pro-level L-series zooms from the firm adopting a constant f4 aperture. Not only does that make the lens relatively small and more portable compared with the f2.8 varients, but it also helps keep it moderately priced. This full-frame lens is also popular with users when mounted on APS-C cameras where it’s the equivalent to a 27-64mm. Like other L-series lenses from the company, the EF 17-40mm f/4L has a high grade optical construction consisting of three aspherical lens elements and even adopts a Super-UD glass element, an expensive glass type usually resevered for more esoteric lenses in the range. The 12-element 9-group construction allows a closer than usual minimum focusing distance of 11.02” (0.28m). It weighes 1.05 lb (475g) and measures 3.81” (96.8mm) in length, and is available now for $839 


Tokina AT-X 16-28 F2.8 PRO FX Canon 849 22 17
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM 1399 22 14
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM 780 21 15
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM 1674 20 14
Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon 350 20 11
Canon EF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 USM 299 19 14
Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM Canon 700 19 11
Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM II Canon 1400 15 12
Sigma 12-24mm f4.5-5.6 EX DG Canon 840 14 8
Best performing wide angle zooms on the Canon EOS 5D Mark III (prices quoted are prices at launch)

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens performance: Very good sharpness, particularly at the wider-end

The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM achieves a high ranking for an ultra-wide angle lens with DxOMark score of 21 points. Peak sharpness at 15P-Mpix is perhaps a little behind the latest designs but it’s still very good. Like so many zooms, it’s better at the wider end where it has good uniformity, even wide-open.  

At 35mm and above, sharpness drops somewhat at the maximum aperture, particularly in the outer field but that improves steadily when stopped down, with peak performance at f/8-11. Chromatic aberration is well reasonably controlled, particularly from 24-40mm but it’s evident in the extreme corners at 17mm. However on an APS-C camera with its smaller sensor CA isn’t an issue, and that’s pretty much the same for vignetting

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM versus Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM both mounted on Canon EOS 5D Mark III: Competitive performence


When compared against the $1,699 Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM, the smaller, lighter f/4 model holds its own.

In fact the two perform at a similar level. The faster lens is a better performer at 35mm but the 17-40mm has more uniform sharpness across the field and marginally higher peak sharpness (albeit at different settings between them, and a difference of 1P-Mpix is trivial in real world terms).

The 16-35mm f/2.8L even has slightly higher levels of lateral chromatic aberration covering a larger area at its widest focal length, though levels are very low by 20mm. That’s quite an achievement although it’s worth remembering that the 16-35mm lens is both slightly wider and a stop faster (or just less when comparing Transmission).

Due to its more glamorous sibling this modest lens is often overlooked though it’s well known for its high-performance by Canon users. As a small, light, highly portable zoom it would make a great choice for travel, landscapes and general-purpose photography.  Although not exactly cheap at $839, if portability is a concern it’s a great alternative to the faster model.

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.