We will compare the EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM with its Nikon equivalent: the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED
- Both lenses manage to keep the distortion low
- The Nikon lens is a little sharper and has a more homogenous resolution than the Canon
- But the 10-22mm has a small advantage in term of Chromatic Aberration, especially in the corners at 10mm
- The Nikon controls its vignetting better at F/3.5
If we look at their landscape Use Case scores, for which they are made, the EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM wins with an excellent 4.5 stars where the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED only gets 3.5 stars.
In conclusion, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a good lens for landscape, thanks to its low chromatic aberrations and its minimum distortion.
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.