Apart from a smaller screen, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL share the same specs, including the same Tensor G4 processor. We tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro display, and as expected, the results were the same as those for Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. Overall, these two products had a very similar performance despite a different screen-to-body ratio and some slight differences in color rendering. The Google Pixel 9 Pro display also earned DXOMARK’s Eye Comfort Label.
For more detailed information about the Google Pixel 9 Pro’s display performance, please see the test results of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.3 inches OLED LTPO
- Dimensions: 152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches)
- Resolution: 1280 x 2856 pixels, (~495 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
158
display
156
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
164
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
156
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
154
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Eye Comfort Label & Attributes
<20%
Flicker perception probability
% of population
1.48
Minimum Brightness
in nits
0.6
Circadian Action Factor
99%
Color
Consistency
vs Display-P3 color space
Position in Global Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
8. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
10. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
10. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
17. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
19. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
24. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
24. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
32. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
38. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
41. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
43. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
49. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
49. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
54. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
60. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
66. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
77. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
77. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
82. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
85. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
85. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
90. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
95. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
95. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
99. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
99. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
99. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
110. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
114. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
118. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
135. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
139. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
139. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
143. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
149. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
151. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
154. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
155. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
159. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
162. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
6. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
7. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
12. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
14. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
18. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
18. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
30. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
34. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
36. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
39. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
39. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
45. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
52. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
54. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
56. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
56. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
56. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
63. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
63. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
67. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
75. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
88. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
90. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- Faithful and well-rendered colors in most tested conditions
- Well-adapted for readability in most environments
- HDR10 video is pleasant to watch in low light and indoor conditions
- Accurate and fast touch
Cons
- Slightly low luminance for SDR video
- Loss of luminance and a visible color shift when viewed on an angle
- Holding device in landscape orientation could result in unwanted touches with the palm of the hand