English
We put the Honor Magic V3 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across four criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key display specifications
- 7.92 inches AMOLED
- Dimensions: 156.6 x 145.3 x 4.35 mm (unfolded); 156.6 x 74.0 x 9.2 (folded)
- Resolution: 2156 x 2344 pixels, (~402 ppi density)
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Honor Magic V3
149
display
Position in Global Ranking
19th
19th
1. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
158
2. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
3. Google Pixel 9
156
4. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
5. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
5. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
5. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
9. Google Pixel 8
153
9. Vivo X100 Pro
153
11. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
12. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
12. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
151
12. Honor Magic V2
151
12. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
12. Honor 200 Pro
151
17. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
17. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
19. Honor Magic V3
149
19. Samsung Galaxy S23
149
21. Google Pixel 7 Pro
148
21. Huawei Pocket 2
148
21. Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
148
21. Huawei Mate 60 Pro
148
21. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
26. Honor 200
147
26. Samsung Galaxy S23+
147
26. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
29. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
29. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
146
31. Google Pixel Fold
145
31. Google Pixel 8a
145
31. Vivo X Fold3 Pro
145
34. Oppo Find X7 Ultra
144
34. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
36. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
36. Huawei P60 Pro
143
36. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
39. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
39. Oppo Find N2 Flip
142
39. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
39. Xiaomi 14T
142
43. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
141
44. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
140
44. Apple iPhone 15
140
44. Honor 90
140
44. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
48. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
138
48. Apple iPhone 14
138
48. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
48. Oppo Find X6 Pro
138
52. OnePlus Open
137
52. Oppo Find X5 Pro
137
52. Vivo X Fold
137
52. Xiaomi 14
137
56. Google Pixel 7
136
56. Honor Magic Vs
136
56. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
136
59. Apple iPhone 13
135
59. Google Pixel 7a
135
59. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
59. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
64. Huawei P50 Pro
134
64. Nothing Phone (2)
134
64. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
67. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
133
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
67. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
67. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
67. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
72. Asus ROG Phone 7
132
72. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
72. Vivo X90 Pro
132
72. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
132
72. Xiaomi 13
132
77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
77. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
77. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
77. Xiaomi 13 Pro
131
81. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
81. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
81. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
81. Oppo Find X5
130
81. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
81. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
81. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
81. Vivo X70 Pro+
130
81. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
81. Xiaomi 12T
130
92. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
92. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
92. Xiaomi 13T
129
95. Oppo Find N2
128
96. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
96. Asus ROG Phone 6
127
96. Sony Xperia 5 V
127
96. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
100. Asus Zenfone 10
126
100. Oppo Find X6
126
100. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
100. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
104. Google Pixel 6a
125
104. Google Pixel 6
125
104. Honor 70
125
104. Oppo Find X3 Pro
125
104. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
125
104. Xiaomi Mi 11
125
104. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
111. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
124
111. Motorola Razr 50
124
111. OnePlus 11
124
111. OnePlus 10 Pro
124
111. OnePlus 9 Pro
124
111. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
117. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
117. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
123
117. Oppo Find X3 Neo
123
117. Xiaomi 12 Pro
123
121. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
121. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
121. Nothing Phone(1)
122
124. Apple iPhone 12
121
125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
125. Realme GT 5G
120
127. Fairphone 5
119
127. Xiaomi 12
119
129. Asus Zenfone 8
115
129. Oppo Reno6 5G
115
131. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
114
131. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
133. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
133. Oppo Find X5 Lite
113
135. POCO F4 GT
111
136. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
137. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
138. Sony Xperia 10 V
105
139. Sony Xperia 10 IV
104
140. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
103
141. Black Shark 5 Pro
100
142. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
99
143. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
15th
15th
1. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
158
2. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
3. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
4. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
4. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
7. Vivo X100 Pro
153
8. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
151
9. Honor Magic V2
151
9. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
13. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
13. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
15. Honor Magic V3
149
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
148
16. Huawei Pocket 2
148
16. Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
148
16. Huawei Mate 60 Pro
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
21. Samsung Galaxy S23+
147
22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
146
24. Google Pixel Fold
145
24. Vivo X Fold3 Pro
145
26. Oppo Find X7 Ultra
144
26. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
28. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
28. Huawei P60 Pro
143
30. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
30. Oppo Find N2 Flip
142
30. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
33. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
141
34. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
140
35. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
138
35. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
35. Oppo Find X6 Pro
138
38. OnePlus Open
137
38. Oppo Find X5 Pro
137
38. Vivo X Fold
137
41. Honor Magic Vs
136
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
42. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
44. Huawei P50 Pro
134
44. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
46. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
133
46. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
46. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
46. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
50. Asus ROG Phone 7
132
50. Vivo X90 Pro
132
50. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
132
53. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
53. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
53. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
53. Xiaomi 13 Pro
131
57. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
57. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
57. Oppo Find X5
130
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
57. Vivo X70 Pro+
130
57. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
64. Oppo Find N2
128
65. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
65. Asus ROG Phone 6
127
65. Sony Xperia 5 V
127
68. Oppo Find X6
126
68. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
70. Oppo Find X3 Pro
125
70. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
125
70. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
73. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
124
73. Motorola Razr 50
124
73. OnePlus 10 Pro
124
73. OnePlus 9 Pro
124
77. Xiaomi 12 Pro
123
78. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
78. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
80. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
81. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
82. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
103
Pros
- Good HDR10 video brightness and details in indoor and low-light conditions
- Good brightness in indoor and low-light conditions
- Good smoothness when scrolling on the web or on the gallery app
Cons
- Lacks brightness when viewing the device under sunlight
- Lacks brightness when watching SDR videos in low light
The Honor Magic V3’s overall display performance was strong within our foldables category but was slightly behind its predecessor, the Magic V2, due to lower results in readability and color.
The flicker-free screen’s strongest attribute was readability, with results that were on par with its closest competitors in indoor conditions. But the V3’s readability diminished considerably in outdoor use cases, particularly in sunlight. Luminance levels didn’t quite match those of the V2 in bright sunlight, and in high brightness mode, the device reached a peak luminance of 720 cd/m², compared to the V2’s 950 cd/m².
While the unfolded screen’s readability benefited from the anti-reflective film, the Magic V3’s reflection was also slightly higher than its predecessor’s.
In color, outdoor lighting reduced the display’s color gamut, which resulted in less faithful color rendering.
In the video-watching use case, the Magic V3 exhibited good HDR10 brightness and details in indoor and low light, matching the experience of its predecessor and providing an overall satisfying experience.
The Magic V3 touch interactions showed a marked improvement over the previous generation, with screen responsiveness that was fast and accurate.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis, a device undergoes a series of objective and perceptual tests in controlled lab and real-life conditions. The DXOMARK Display score takes into account the overall user experience the screen provides, considering the hardware capacity and the software tuning. In testing, only factory-installed video and photo apps are used. More in-depth details about how DXOMARK tests displays are available in the article “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section focuses on the key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Full reports with detailed performance evaluations are available upon request. To order a copy, please contact us.
Readability
153
Honor Magic V3
164
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates the user’s ease and comfort of viewing still content, such as photos or a web page, on the display under different lighting conditions. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing and analysis.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen luminance in environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Contrast under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen’s contrast levels in lighting environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Luminance vs Viewing Angle
This graph presents how the luminance drops as viewing angles increase.
Skin-tone rendering in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic V3, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, Vivo X Fold 3 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Skin-tone rendering in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic V3, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, Vivo X Fold 3 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Average Reflectance (SCI) Honor Magic V3
1.9 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Honor Magic V3
Honor Magic V2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Average reflectance is computed based on the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum range (see graph below) and human spectral sensitivity.
Average reflectance is computed based on the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum range (see graph below) and human spectral sensitivity.
Reflectance (SCI)
Wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color, but also our capacity to see it; for example, UV is a very low wavelength that the human eye cannot see; Infrared is a high wavelength that the human eye also cannot see). White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, i.e. the range the human eye can see. Measurements above show the reflection of the devices within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm).
Uniformity
This graph shows the distribution of luminance throughout the entire display panel. Uniformity is measured with a 20% gray pattern, with bright green indicating ideal luminance. An evenly spread-out bright green color on the screen indicates that the display’s brightness is uniform. Other colors indicate a loss of uniformity.
PWM Frequency Honor Magic V3
No flicker
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Honor Magic V3
Honor Magic V2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the most important modulation. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue.
Color
140
Honor Magic V3
165
Google Pixel 8
How Display Color score is composed
Color evaluations are performed in different lighting conditions to see how well the device manages color with the surrounding environment. Devices are tested with sRGB and Display-P3 image patterns. Both faithful mode and default mode are used for our evaluation. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing & analysis.
White point color under D65 illuminant at 830 lux