We put the Oppo Find X5 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance. Here’s a look at how it did.
Overview
Key display specifications:
-
- 6.55 inches OLED
- Dimensions: 160.3 × 72.6 × 8.7 mm
- Resolution: 2400 x 1080 pixels, 402ppi
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Oppo Find X5
130
display
149
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
138
Google Pixel 10
Best: Google Pixel 10 (167)
103
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
145
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking

111
th
1. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
161
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
4. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
10. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
156
12. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
155
12. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
155
12. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
16. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
16. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
16. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
23. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
25. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
151
25. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
33. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
33. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
150
33. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
43. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
49. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
52. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
54. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
61. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
61. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
66. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
66. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
72. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
77. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
78. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
89. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
89. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
94. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
97. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
97. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
97. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
97. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
102. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
107. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
111. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
122. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
126. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
130. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
147. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
151. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
151. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
155. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
161. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
163. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
166. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
167. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
171. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
174. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

78
th
1. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
161
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
4. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
9. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
156
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
155
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
155
10. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
13. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
13. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
18. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
20. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
151
20. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
26. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
26. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
150
26. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
40. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
44. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
47. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
50. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
50. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
56. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
63. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
65. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
67. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
67. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
74. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
74. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
78. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
78. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
99. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
101. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
102. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
Pros
- Readable in most tested conditions with a brightness adaptation according to the time of the day
- Device smoothness when playing video games and in the gallery app
- Good color and brightness uniformity
Cons
- Very saturated colors in HDR10 videos, with dark tones hardly visible
- Strong color shift when viewed in angle
- Visible aliasing
The Oppo Find X5 display is well suited for overall indoor and low-light use, thanks to good color fidelity and good readability. But when it comes to watching videos, oversaturated colors and hard-to-see dark tones make viewing of HDR10 content quite difficult and uncomfortable on the eyes. On the other hand, for gaming, the device’s display offered a comfortable and smooth experience, with no visible frame drops, despite some aliasing.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
Readability
149
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read the display under different real-life conditions on still content (photos & web). DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests,perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions

Indoor at 1000 lux, from left to right: Oppo Find X5, 0nePlus 9, Apple iPhone 13, GooglePixel 6 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)

In direct sunlight (>90,000 lux), from left to right: Oppo Find X5, 0nePlus 9, Apple iPhone 13, Google Pixel 6 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Color
138
Google Pixel 10
Google Pixel 10
How Display Color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point color temperature under indoor lighting conditions (1000 lux)
In the graphs below, each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the greater the color difference is visible. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will only be visible to trained eyes. In the case of the Oppo Find X5, the color spaces could have been better managed.
Oppo Find X5, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Oppo Find X5, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
White point on angle, Oppo Find X5
White point on angle, Oppo Find X5
From left to right, on-axis: Oppo Find X5, 0nePlus 9, Apple iPhone 13, Google Pixel 6 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
From left to right, on angle: Oppo Find X5, 0nePlus 9, Apple iPhone 13, Google Pixel 6 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Video
103
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
How Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the mastering color space of each video.
HDR10 content viewed in low light. Clockwise from top left: Oppo Find X5, 0nePlus 9, Google Pixel 6 Pro, Apple iPhone 13.
(Photos for illustration only)
How Display Motion score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.
Oppo Find X5 frame drops at 30 fps
Oppo Find X5 frame drops at 60 fps
This long exposure photo presents the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).
Touch
145
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
How Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.
Average Touch Response Time Oppo Find X5
This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between the robot touching the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.
How Display Artifacts score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker as well as evaluates the residual aliasing when playing videogames, among others.
Average Reflectance (SCI) Oppo Find X5
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Measurements above that show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection
PWM Frequency Oppo Find X5
360 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.