Smartphones > Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G > Display Test Results
High-End ?

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G Display test

This device has been retested in the latest version of our protocol. Overall, sub-scores and attributes are up to date. For detailed information, check the What’s New article
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is located just below the Reno5 Pro+ 5G in the Oppo smartphone lineup and comes with a similar feature set. Main hardware differences are the Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity chipset instead of the Snapdragon 865 in the Plus model and the lack of a tele module in the main camera. But both models use the same 6.55-inch AMOLED display with 1080- x 2400-pixel resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate.

Key display specifications:

  • AMOLED screen
  • Size: 6.55 inches (89% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9, 402 ppi
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz

With the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G and Pro+ 5G sharing the same display specs, one would expect the Display test results to be very close. We have confirmed this by putting the Oppo Reno5 5G through the complete DXOMARK Display test protocol.

The Reno5 Pro 5G achieves a DXOMARK Display overall score of 81 versus the Plus models 83. Results across almost all attributes are very similar (within a one or two-point margin). The only noticeable difference we encountered was for motion, where the Reno5 Pro 5G shows slightly more frame drops in video and less reactive video playback, resulting in a motion score that is five points lower.

Given the almost identical results, we are posting only this short article for the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G. For the full set of measurements as well as a complete analysis, please click on the link below and read the full review of the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G.

Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G Display review

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
display
118

160

130

159

92

162

121

155

110

165

114

149

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.

Pros

  • Fairly faithful color in indoor and low-light conditions
  • Well-adapted brightness levels provide good readability indoors
  • No frame mismatches when playing video games

Cons

  • Very strong video contrast rendering results in unpleasant HDR10 videos
  • Image rendering is modified in outdoor light to improve readability, resulting in unnatural rendering of both contrast and color
  • Frame mismatches impact the overall video playback experience

DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.