Smartphones  >  Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G  >  Display Test Results
High-End ?

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G Display test

June 10, 2021
Go to product review
114
display
This device has been retested in the latest version of our protocol. Overall, sub-scores and attributes are up to date. For detailed information, check the What’s New article
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is located just below the Reno5 Pro+ 5G in the Oppo smartphone lineup and comes with a similar feature set. Main hardware differences are the Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity chipset instead of the Snapdragon 865 in the Plus model and the lack of a tele module in the main camera. But both models use the same 6.55-inch AMOLED display with 1080- x 2400-pixel resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate.

Key display specifications:

  • AMOLED screen
  • Size: 6.55 inches (89% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9, 402 ppi
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz

With the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G and Pro+ 5G sharing the same display specs, one would expect the Display test results to be very close. We have confirmed this by putting the Oppo Reno5 5G through the complete DXOMARK Display test protocol.

The Reno5 Pro 5G achieves a DXOMARK Display overall score of 81 versus the Plus models 83. Results across almost all attributes are very similar (within a one or two-point margin). The only noticeable difference we encountered was for motion, where the Reno5 Pro 5G shows slightly more frame drops in video and less reactive video playback, resulting in a motion score that is five points lower.

Given the almost identical results, we are posting only this short article for the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G. For the full set of measurements as well as a complete analysis, please click on the link below and read the full review of the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G.

Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G Display review

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
display
Readability
118

163

Color
130

164

Video
92

162

Motion
121

159

Touch
110

170

Artifacts
114

163

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
137th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
16. Vivo X100 Pro
148
19. OnePlus Open
147
20. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
20. Huawei P60 Pro
146
20. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
23. Apple iPhone 15
145
23. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
25. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
25. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
27. Huawei Mate 60 Pro
143
28. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
28. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
141
30. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
30. Google Pixel 7a
140
30. Google Pixel 7
140
30. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
30. Honor 90
140
30. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
30. Vivo X Fold
140
37. Apple iPhone 14
139
37. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
37. Honor Magic Vs
139
37. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
37. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
42. Oppo Find X5
138
43. Apple iPhone 13
136
43. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
43. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
46. Huawei P50 Pro
135
46. Nothing Phone (2)
135
46. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
46. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
46. Xiaomi 13
135
51. Asus Zenfone 10
134
51. Oppo Find X6
134
51. Oppo Find N2
134
51. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
51. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
134
51. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
58. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
58. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
58. Vivo X90 Pro
133
58. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
58. Xiaomi 14
133
64. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
65. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
65. Xiaomi 12T
131
69. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
69. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
69. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
69. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
69. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
69. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
69. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
76. OnePlus 11
129
76. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
76. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
76. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
76. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
76. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
76. Xiaomi 13T
129
76. Xiaomi 11T
129
85. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
85. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
85. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
85. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
85. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
90. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
90. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
90. OnePlus 8T
127
90. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
94. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
94. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
94. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
97. Google Pixel 6a
125
97. Google Pixel 6
125
97. LG Wing
125
97. OnePlus 9
125
97. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
97. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
97. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
97. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
97. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
97. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
107. Honor 70
124
107. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
107. Oppo Find N
124
107. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
107. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
107. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
113. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
113. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
113. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
113. Vivo X51 5G
123
113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
118. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
118. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
118. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
118. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
118. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
118. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
124. Apple iPhone 12
120
124. Huawei P40 Pro
120
124. Nothing Phone(1)
120
124. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
128. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
128. Realme GT 5G
118
128. Xiaomi 12
118
131. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
131. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
131. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
131. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
135. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
135. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
137. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
138. Asus Zenfone 8
113
139. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
140. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
140. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
140. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
140. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
144. Fairphone 5
110
144. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
144. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
147. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
147. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
149. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
150. POCO F4 GT
107
150. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
152. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
153. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
153. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
153. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
156. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
157. Honor 90 Smart
102
158. Google Pixel 5
101
159. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
159. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
161. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
162. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
163. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
164. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
164. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
164. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
167. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
167. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
169. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
170. Fairphone 4
87
171. Crosscall Action-X5
77
172. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
173. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
174. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
175. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
176. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
177. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in High-End Ranking
21st
1. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
141
2. Google Pixel 7a
140
2. Google Pixel 7
140
2. Honor 90
140
5. Nothing Phone (2)
135
6. Xiaomi 12T
131
7. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
7. Xiaomi 11T
129
9. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
10. OnePlus 8T
127
11. Google Pixel 6a
125
11. Google Pixel 6
125
13. Honor 70
124
13. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
16. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
17. Nothing Phone(1)
120
17. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
19. Realme GT 5G
118
20. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
21. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
22. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
23. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
23. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
23. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
26. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
26. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
28. POCO F4 GT
107
28. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
30. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
30. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
32. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
33. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
34. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
35. Fairphone 4
87
36. Crosscall Action-X5
77

Pros

  • Fairly faithful color in indoor and low-light conditions
  • Well-adapted brightness levels provide good readability indoors
  • No frame mismatches when playing video games

Cons

  • Very strong video contrast rendering results in unpleasant HDR10 videos
  • Image rendering is modified in outdoor light to improve readability, resulting in unnatural rendering of both contrast and color
  • Frame mismatches impact the overall video playback experience

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.