Smartphones  >  Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G  >  Display Test Results
High-End ?

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G Display test

June 10, 2021
Go to product review
114
display
This device has been retested in the latest version of our protocol. Overall, sub-scores and attributes are up to date. For detailed information, check the What’s New article
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is located just below the Reno5 Pro+ 5G in the Oppo smartphone lineup and comes with a similar feature set. Main hardware differences are the Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity chipset instead of the Snapdragon 865 in the Plus model and the lack of a tele module in the main camera. But both models use the same 6.55-inch AMOLED display with 1080- x 2400-pixel resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate.

Key display specifications:

  • AMOLED screen
  • Size: 6.55 inches (89% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9, 402 ppi
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz

With the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G and Pro+ 5G sharing the same display specs, one would expect the Display test results to be very close. We have confirmed this by putting the Oppo Reno5 5G through the complete DXOMARK Display test protocol.

The Reno5 Pro 5G achieves a DXOMARK Display overall score of 81 versus the Plus models 83. Results across almost all attributes are very similar (within a one or two-point margin). The only noticeable difference we encountered was for motion, where the Reno5 Pro 5G shows slightly more frame drops in video and less reactive video playback, resulting in a motion score that is five points lower.

Given the almost identical results, we are posting only this short article for the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G. For the full set of measurements as well as a complete analysis, please click on the link below and read the full review of the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G.

Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G Display review

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
display
Readability
118

160

Color
130

164

Video
92

162

Motion
121

155

Touch
110

168

Artifacts
114

161

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
112th
1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
2. Google Pixel Fold
151
2. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
4. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
8. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
8. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
10. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
10. Huawei P60 Pro
146
10. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
13. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
14. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
15. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
16. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
16. Google Pixel 7a
140
16. Google Pixel 7
140
16. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
16. Honor 90
140
16. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
16. Vivo X Fold
140
23. Apple iPhone 14
139
23. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
23. Honor Magic Vs
139
23. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Oppo Find X5
138
28. Apple iPhone 13
136
28. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
28. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
31. Huawei P50 Pro
135
31. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
31. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
31. Xiaomi 13
135
35. Oppo Find N2
134
35. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
35. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
35. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
39. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
39. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
39. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
39. Vivo X90 Pro
133
39. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
44. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
45. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
45. Xiaomi 12T
131
49. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
49. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
56. OnePlus 11
129
56. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
56. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
56. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
56. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
56. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
56. Xiaomi 11T
129
63. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
63. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
63. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
66. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
66. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
66. OnePlus 8T
127
66. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
70. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
70. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
70. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
73. Google Pixel 6a
125
73. Google Pixel 6
125
73. LG Wing
125
73. OnePlus 9
125
73. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
73. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
73. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
73. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
73. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
73. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
83. Honor 70
124
83. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
83. Oppo Find N
124
83. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
83. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
83. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
89. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
89. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
89. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
89. Vivo X51 5G
123
93. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
93. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
93. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
93. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
93. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
93. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
99. Apple iPhone 12
120
99. Huawei P40 Pro
120
99. Nothing Phone(1)
120
99. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
103. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
103. Realme GT 5G
118
103. Xiaomi 12
118
106. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
106. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
106. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
106. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
110. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
110. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
112. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
113. Asus Zenfone 8
113
114. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
115. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
115. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
115. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
115. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
119. Fairphone 5
110
119. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
119. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
122. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
122. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
124. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
125. POCO F4 GT
107
125. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
127. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
128. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
128. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
128. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
131. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
132. Google Pixel 5
101
133. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
133. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
135. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
136. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
137. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
138. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
138. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
138. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
141. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
141. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
143. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
144. Fairphone 4
87
145. Crosscall Action-X5
77
146. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
147. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
148. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
149. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
150. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
151. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in High-End Ranking
17th
1. Google Pixel 7a
140
1. Google Pixel 7
140
1. Honor 90
140
4. Xiaomi 12T
131
5. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
5. Xiaomi 11T
129
7. OnePlus 8T
127
8. Google Pixel 6a
125
8. Google Pixel 6
125
10. Honor 70
124
10. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
12. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
13. Nothing Phone(1)
120
13. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
15. Realme GT 5G
118
16. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
17. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
18. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
19. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
19. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
19. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
22. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
22. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
24. POCO F4 GT
107
24. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
26. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
26. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
28. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
29. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
30. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
31. Fairphone 4
87
32. Crosscall Action-X5
77

Pros

  • Fairly faithful color in indoor and low-light conditions
  • Well-adapted brightness levels provide good readability indoors
  • No frame mismatches when playing video games

Cons

  • Very strong video contrast rendering results in unpleasant HDR10 videos
  • Image rendering is modified in outdoor light to improve readability, resulting in unnatural rendering of both contrast and color
  • Frame mismatches impact the overall video playback experience

DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.